DoD's OUSD(P) Security Cooperation Programs Contract with SAIC Exceeds $31.5M for Consulting Services

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $31,569,222 ($31.6M)

Contractor: Science Applications International Corporation

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2017-09-30

End Date: 2023-03-29

Contract Duration: 2,006 days

Daily Burn Rate: $15.7K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: OUSD(P) SECURITY COOPERATION PROGRAMS

Place of Performance

Location: WASHINGTON, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA County, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 20301

State: District of Columbia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $31.6 million to SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION for work described as: OUSD(P) SECURITY COOPERATION PROGRAMS Key points: 1. The contract value is substantial at over $31.5 million. 2. SAIC is a major defense contractor, indicating significant competition in the sector. 3. The contract duration is long (2006-2023), raising questions about sustained need and potential for price creep. 4. Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services (NAICS 541611) is a broad category, requiring clarity on specific deliverables.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract's firm-fixed-price structure is generally good for cost control. However, the extended duration without clear interim reviews could mask inefficiencies. Benchmarking against similar long-term consulting contracts is difficult without more specific service details.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, which is positive for price discovery. The BPA Call award mechanism suggests a pre-competed framework, but the specific pricing for this call needs further scrutiny to ensure it reflects competitive rates.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayer funds are utilized for consulting services. While competition is a positive sign, the long duration and potential for scope creep warrant careful monitoring to ensure value for money.

Public Impact

This contract supports critical security cooperation initiatives within the Department of Defense. The services provided by SAIC likely contribute to strategic planning and program management for international security partnerships. Long-term reliance on a single contractor for these services may limit flexibility and innovation in program execution.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

  • Extended contract duration (2006-2023)
  • Lack of specific performance metrics in provided data
  • Potential for scope creep over a long period

Positive Signals

  • Awarded under full and open competition
  • Firm-fixed-price contract type
  • SAIC is a reputable contractor

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the professional, scientific, and technical services sector, specifically management consulting. Spending in this area by the DoD is significant, often driven by complex program management and strategic planning needs. Benchmarks vary widely based on the specificity of services.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates this contract was not awarded to small businesses (SB: false). This suggests the scope and nature of the services required were likely beyond the capacity or specialization of most small businesses in this domain.

Oversight & Accountability

The long duration of the contract necessitates robust oversight from the Department of Defense to ensure continued relevance, performance, and cost-effectiveness. Regular performance reviews and potential re-competition should be standard practice.

Related Government Programs

  • Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services
  • Department of Defense Contracting
  • Washington Headquarters Services Programs

Risk Flags

  • Long contract duration
  • Lack of specific performance metrics
  • Potential for contractor lock-in
  • Limited visibility into specific services provided
  • No indication of small business participation

Tags

administrative-management-and-general-ma, department-of-defense, dc, bpa-call, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $31.6 million to SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION. OUSD(P) SECURITY COOPERATION PROGRAMS

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Washington Headquarters Services).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $31.6 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2017-09-30. End: 2023-03-29.

What specific deliverables and performance metrics were established for SAIC under this contract, and how were they measured over its 16-year duration?

The provided data lacks specific deliverables and performance metrics. A comprehensive review would require access to the contract's Statement of Work (SOW) and performance reports. Without these, assessing the actual value delivered by SAIC is challenging. The firm-fixed-price nature suggests defined tasks, but the long timeframe implies potential for evolving requirements that may not have been adequately captured or re-negotiated.

Given the 16-year span, what mechanisms were in place to mitigate the risk of contractor lock-in and ensure the government retained flexibility to adapt to changing security cooperation needs?

While the contract was full and open, its extended duration inherently increases the risk of contractor lock-in. Mechanisms like clearly defined contract clauses for termination for convenience, regular performance reviews, and potentially phased re-competitions at key intervals would be crucial. The absence of specific data on these oversight practices raises concerns about adaptability and potential missed opportunities for innovation.

How effectively did the full and open competition process ensure competitive pricing for SAIC's services over the entire contract period, considering potential market shifts?

Full and open competition at the outset is a strong indicator of initial price reasonableness. However, for a contract spanning 16 years, the initial competitive pricing may not remain optimal. Market dynamics, inflation, and changes in service delivery costs can occur. The BPA Call mechanism suggests a pre-negotiated rate structure, but its long-term competitiveness depends on periodic reviews and potential re-competition of the underlying BPA.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical ServicesManagement, Scientific, and Technical Consulting ServicesAdministrative Management and General Management Consulting Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT)PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 12010 SUNSET HILLS RD, RESTON, VA, 20190

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $31,569,222

Exercised Options: $31,569,222

Current Obligation: $31,569,222

Actual Outlays: $1,369,429

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: HQ003415A0019

IDV Type: BPA

Timeline

Start Date: 2017-09-30

Current End Date: 2023-03-29

Potential End Date: 2023-03-29 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2025-09-17

More Contracts from Science Applications International Corporation

View all Science Applications International Corporation federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending