MDA awards $12.7M for Program Evaluation Services, extending contract to 2011
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $12,716,347 ($12.7M)
Contractor: Science Applications International Corporation
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2004-05-14
End Date: 2011-03-31
Contract Duration: 2,512 days
Daily Burn Rate: $5.1K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS
Sector: Other
Official Description: 200412!000603!9700!HQ0006!MISSILE DEFENSE AGENCY !GS23F8006H !C!N! !N!HQ000604F0006! !20040514!20050331!054781240!054781240!054781240!N!SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATI!10260 CAMPUS POINT DRIVE !SAN DIEGO !CA!92121!03000!013!51!ARLINGTON !ARLINGTON !VIRGINIA !+000000500000!N!N!000000000000!R407!PROGRAM EVALUATION SERVICES !S1 !SERVICES !CAA !MDA SUPPORT !541611!E! !6! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! ! ! !A! ! ! !000! ! ! ! ! ! ! !Y!C!N!N! ! ! ! ! ! !00 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! !
Place of Performance
Location: ARLINGTON, ARLINGTON County, VIRGINIA, 22201
State: Virginia Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $12.7 million to SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION for work described as: 200412!000603!9700!HQ0006!MISSILE DEFENSE AGENCY !GS23F8006H !C!N! !N!HQ000604F0006! !20040514!20050331!054781240!054781240!054781240!N!SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATI!10260 CAMPUS POINT DRIVE !SAN DIEGO !CA!92121!03000!013!51!ARLINGTON !ARLI… Key points: 1. Contract awarded for critical program evaluation services to support the Missile Defense Agency. 2. Significant contract value of over $12.7 million indicates a substantial need for these services. 3. The contract was awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 4. Services fall under Administrative Management and General Management Consulting, a common government support sector.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract value of $12.7M over its duration appears reasonable for specialized program evaluation services. Benchmarking against similar contracts for management consulting in the defense sector would provide a more precise assessment.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
Awarded under full and open competition, this method likely ensured competitive pricing and access to a broad range of qualified contractors. The specific price discovery mechanisms within the bidding process are not detailed.
Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayer funds are being used for essential program evaluation, which can lead to improved efficiency and effectiveness of defense spending, ultimately benefiting taxpayers.
Public Impact
Supports the critical mission of the Missile Defense Agency by ensuring program effectiveness. The services provided contribute to informed decision-making for complex defense systems. Contracting through full and open competition promotes fairness and potentially better value for taxpayer money.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Contract duration extends over 7 years, potentially locking in costs and limiting flexibility.
- Specific performance metrics and success criteria are not detailed in the provided data.
Positive Signals
- Awarded through full and open competition, indicating a robust selection process.
- Services are crucial for the effective management and oversight of defense programs.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the professional, scientific, and technical services sector, specifically management consulting. Spending in this area is common across government agencies for specialized expertise, with benchmarks varying widely based on service type and duration.
Small Business Impact
The data does not indicate any specific set-asides or participation goals for small businesses in this contract. Further analysis would be needed to determine the extent of small business involvement.
Oversight & Accountability
The award of this contract suggests existing oversight mechanisms are in place. However, details on ongoing performance monitoring and accountability measures are not provided.
Related Government Programs
- Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Missile Defense Agency Programs
Risk Flags
- Long contract duration (over 7 years) may limit flexibility and price competitiveness.
- Lack of detailed performance metrics makes assessing contractor effectiveness challenging.
- No information on small business participation.
- Potential for cost overruns or scope creep over an extended period.
Tags
administrative-management-and-general-ma, department-of-defense, va, delivery-order, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $12.7 million to SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION. 200412!000603!9700!HQ0006!MISSILE DEFENSE AGENCY !GS23F8006H !C!N! !N!HQ000604F0006! !20040514!20050331!054781240!054781240!054781240!N!SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATI!10260 CAMPUS POINT DRIVE !SAN DIEGO !CA!92121!03000!013!51!ARLINGTON !ARLINGTON !VIRGINIA !+000000500000!N!N!000000000000!R407!PROGRAM EVALUATION SERVICES !S1 !SERVICES !CAA !MDA SUPPORT !541611!E! !6! ! ! ! ! !999
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Missile Defense Agency).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $12.7 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2004-05-14. End: 2011-03-31.
What specific program evaluation methodologies were employed, and how did they contribute to measurable improvements in MDA's operations?
The provided data does not detail the specific methodologies used for program evaluation. To assess value, further information would be required on the types of analyses conducted, such as cost-benefit analyses, performance audits, or strategic reviews, and their direct impact on improving the efficiency, effectiveness, or cost-efficiency of the Missile Defense Agency's programs.
What were the key factors considered during the full and open competition that led to the selection of this contractor, and were there any significant price differences among bidders?
While the contract was awarded under full and open competition, the specific evaluation criteria and the range of bids received are not detailed. Key factors typically include technical approach, past performance, and price. Understanding the competitive landscape and any significant price variations would be crucial to assessing whether the government secured the best possible value and if the chosen contractor offered a compelling technical and cost solution.
How effectively did the contractor's services align with the Missile Defense Agency's evolving needs throughout the contract's extended duration, and were there mechanisms for adapting the scope or pr
The contract spanned over seven years, from 2004 to 2011. Assessing effectiveness requires understanding if the program evaluation services remained relevant and impactful as MDA's requirements changed. Information on contract modifications, performance reviews, and the contractor's adaptability to new challenges or technological advancements would be necessary to evaluate the long-term effectiveness and value delivered.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services › Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services
Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › MANAGEMENT SUPPORT SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS (Y)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 1710 SAIC DR, MCLEAN, VA, 22102
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $14,121,452
Exercised Options: $14,121,452
Current Obligation: $12,716,347
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: GS23F8006H
IDV Type: FSS
Timeline
Start Date: 2004-05-14
Current End Date: 2011-03-31
Potential End Date: 2011-03-31 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2016-09-06
More Contracts from Science Applications International Corporation
- Task Order to Provide Project Management Support, Transition Support, Engineering and Design Support, Securing the Infrastructure Support and O&M Support for the Department's IT Consolidation Program — $2.1B (Department of State)
- Software Life Cycle Development — $1.4B (General Services Administration)
- Unified Nasa Information Technology Services (unites) — $1.4B (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- THE Scope of the to IS to Provide Enterprise IT Services for the Usace — $1.1B (General Services Administration)
- This Effort IS for a Follow on Procurement Requirement. the Name of This Procurement IS the Omnibus Multidiscipline Engineering Services (omes) II. the Principal Purpose of This Contract IS to Provide Multidiscipline Engineering Support Services and Related Work to EED, Istd, SED, MSD, Mesa, Jpss, Ssco, and Related Organizations, AS Required, for the Study, Design, Systems Engineering, Development, Fabrication, Integration, Testing, Verification, and Operations of Space Flight, Airborne, and Ground System Hardware and Software, Including Development and Validation of NEW Technologies to Enable Future Space and Science Missions. to This END, the Contractor Shall Provide On/Off-Site Multidiscipline Engineering Services, Pursuant to Task Orders Issued by the Contracting Officer. These Services Shall Include the Personnel, Facilities, and Materials (unless Otherwise Provided by the Government) to Accomplish the Tasks. Travel MAY BE Required by the Contractor to Support Certain Task Orders, These Travel Requirements Will BE Identified on a Task by Task Basis — $1.0B (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
View all Science Applications International Corporation federal contracts →
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)