DoD Awards $8.7M Microsoft Consulting Contract for Thunder Camp Systems

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $8,717,099 ($8.7M)

Contractor: Microsoft Corporation

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2024-09-20

End Date: 2026-09-19

Contract Duration: 729 days

Daily Burn Rate: $12.0K/day

Competition Type: NOT COMPETED

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: IT

Official Description: MICROSOFT CONSULTING SUPPORT (MCS) FOR THUNDER CAMP

Place of Performance

Location: HILL AFB, DAVIS County, UTAH, 84056

State: Utah Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $8.7 million to MICROSOFT CORPORATION for work described as: MICROSOFT CONSULTING SUPPORT (MCS) FOR THUNDER CAMP Key points: 1. Significant award to a single vendor, Microsoft Corporation. 2. Focus on Computer Systems Design Services within the Defense sector. 3. Contract duration of two years raises questions about long-term needs. 4. Potential for cost savings if future needs are met through competition.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The $8.7 million award for consulting services is substantial. Benchmarking against similar, competitively procured IT consulting contracts is difficult without more detail on the specific services provided. The firm fixed-price structure offers some cost certainty.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: sole-source

This contract was not competed, indicating a sole-source award to Microsoft Corporation. This limits price discovery and may result in higher costs compared to a competitive procurement. The rationale for not competing is not provided.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayer funds are being spent without the benefit of competitive bidding, potentially leading to a less optimal price for the services rendered.

Public Impact

Military readiness and operational efficiency may be impacted by the specific systems supported. The reliance on a single vendor for critical IT support raises concerns about vendor lock-in. Future contract actions could continue this sole-source trend if not actively managed.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

This contract falls under Computer Systems Design Services, a critical component of the IT sector supporting defense operations. Benchmarks for similar services vary widely based on scope and duration, but significant awards often warrant competitive processes.

Small Business Impact

This award does not appear to include any specific provisions or set-asides for small businesses. The sole-source nature of the procurement likely precluded small business participation.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight is needed to ensure the services provided are necessary and effectively delivered. Future procurements should explore competitive options to ensure best value for taxpayers.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

computer-systems-design-services, department-of-defense, ut, delivery-order, 1m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $8.7 million to MICROSOFT CORPORATION. MICROSOFT CONSULTING SUPPORT (MCS) FOR THUNDER CAMP

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is MICROSOFT CORPORATION.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Defense Information Systems Agency).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $8.7 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2024-09-20. End: 2026-09-19.

What is the specific justification for awarding this contract sole-source to Microsoft?

The provided data does not include the justification for the sole-source award. Typically, such justifications would cite reasons like unique capabilities, urgent needs, or lack of available alternatives. Without this information, it's difficult to assess the necessity of bypassing the competitive process and its potential impact on value.

What is the risk associated with relying on Microsoft for these specific consulting services?

The primary risk is vendor lock-in, where the agency becomes dependent on Microsoft's proprietary systems and expertise, making it difficult and costly to switch to other vendors or solutions in the future. This can also lead to inflated costs over time if competition is consistently avoided.

How does this contract contribute to the overall effectiveness of the Defense Information Systems Agency's mission?

The effectiveness hinges on the critical nature of the 'Thunder Camp' systems and the quality of Microsoft's consulting support. If these systems are vital for operations, and MCS provides essential expertise, the contract contributes positively. However, the lack of competition raises questions about whether the most effective and cost-efficient solution was secured.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical ServicesComputer Systems Design and Related ServicesComputer Systems Design Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT)PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED

Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE

Solicitation ID: HC102816R0024

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: ONE MICROSOFT WAY, REDMOND, WA, 98052

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Manufacturer of Goods, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $8,717,099

Exercised Options: $8,717,099

Current Obligation: $8,717,099

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: HC102817D0001

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2024-09-20

Current End Date: 2026-09-19

Potential End Date: 2026-09-19 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2025-12-23

More Contracts from Microsoft Corporation

View all Microsoft Corporation federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending