Boeing awarded $723.9M for MH-47G Black Hawk helicopter long-lead production, with delivery through 2029
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $723,876,329 ($723.9M)
Contractor: THE Boeing Company
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2022-07-08
End Date: 2029-03-31
Contract Duration: 2,458 days
Daily Burn Rate: $294.5K/day
Competition Type: NOT COMPETED
Number of Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Defense
Official Description: MH-47G BLKII LOT 6 LONG LEAD PRODUCTION
Place of Performance
Location: RIDLEY PARK, DELAWARE County, PENNSYLVANIA, 19078
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $723.9 million to THE BOEING COMPANY for work described as: MH-47G BLKII LOT 6 LONG LEAD PRODUCTION Key points: 1. Contract awarded to a single, established manufacturer, raising questions about price competitiveness. 2. Long lead-time production suggests a critical need for specialized aircraft components. 3. Firm Fixed Price contract type offers cost certainty but may limit flexibility. 4. The contract duration spans over six years, indicating a significant, long-term investment. 5. No small business set-aside or subcontracting requirements were noted, potentially limiting broader economic impact. 6. Performance is managed by the Defense Contract Management Agency, indicating robust oversight.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract value of $723.9 million for long-lead production of MH-47G Black Hawk helicopters is substantial. Without specific per-unit costs or comparable contract data for this specialized variant, a precise value-for-money assessment is challenging. However, given the sole-source nature and the long production timeline, it is crucial to benchmark against historical MH-47G production costs and similar complex military aircraft procurements to ensure fair pricing. The firm fixed-price structure provides cost predictability for the government.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: sole-source
This contract was awarded on a sole-source basis, meaning The Boeing Company was the only bidder. This approach is typically used when a specific manufacturer possesses unique capabilities or intellectual property essential for the product. While it ensures the use of a known entity for a critical defense asset, it bypasses the competitive process, which could potentially lead to higher costs than if multiple bidders were involved. The lack of competition limits the government's ability to leverage market forces for price discovery.
Taxpayer Impact: The absence of competition means taxpayers may not benefit from the cost savings that could arise from a competitive bidding process. The government relies on negotiation and oversight to ensure a fair price, rather than market-driven price reduction.
Public Impact
The primary beneficiaries are the U.S. Special Operations Command (SOCOM) and potentially other special operations forces requiring the MH-47G variant for critical missions. The contract delivers essential components and manufacturing capabilities for specialized heavy-lift helicopters. The geographic impact is concentrated around Boeing's manufacturing facilities, primarily in Pennsylvania, supporting local jobs and the aerospace supply chain. Workforce implications include the retention and potential expansion of skilled labor in aerospace manufacturing, engineering, and logistics at Boeing and its subcontractors.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Sole-source award limits price competition and potential cost savings for taxpayers.
- Long contract duration increases exposure to potential cost overruns or scope creep if not managed tightly.
- Lack of small business participation may limit the broader economic benefits and opportunities for smaller firms in the defense supply chain.
Positive Signals
- Award to a single, experienced manufacturer (Boeing) ensures continuity and leverages established expertise for a critical defense asset.
- Firm Fixed Price contract provides cost certainty and reduces the risk of cost overruns for the government.
- Long lead-time production indicates a strategic investment in maintaining and modernizing specialized rotary-wing aircraft capabilities.
Sector Analysis
The MH-47G Black Hawk is a specialized variant of the CH-47 Chinook, designed for special operations missions. This contract falls within the broader aerospace and defense manufacturing sector, specifically focusing on rotary-wing aircraft production. The market for such specialized military helicopters is highly concentrated, with a few major defense contractors dominating. Spending benchmarks for similar complex aircraft programs often run into hundreds of millions or billions of dollars, reflecting the high cost of development, manufacturing, and integration of advanced military technology.
Small Business Impact
This contract does not appear to include specific small business set-aside provisions, nor were subcontracting goals explicitly mentioned in the provided data. The award to a large prime contractor like Boeing suggests that the primary focus is on leveraging their established manufacturing capabilities. This could limit opportunities for small businesses to directly participate in this specific contract, although they may be involved further down the supply chain. The absence of explicit small business requirements warrants further investigation into Boeing's subcontracting plans to ensure broader economic participation.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract is likely managed by the Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA), which is responsible for ensuring contractor performance and compliance with contract terms. The firm fixed-price nature of the contract provides a degree of accountability by capping costs for the government. Transparency regarding specific performance metrics and detailed spending breakdowns would be crucial for a comprehensive assessment of accountability. Inspector General reviews may be initiated if specific performance or financial irregularities are suspected.
Related Government Programs
- MH-47G Helicopter Program
- Special Operations Aviation
- Rotary-Wing Aircraft Procurement
- Defense Production Act Investments
- Aerospace Manufacturing Contracts
Risk Flags
- Sole-source award
- Long contract duration
- Potential for cost overruns (inherent in long-term complex manufacturing)
- Lack of explicit small business subcontracting goals
Tags
defense, department-of-defense, the-boeing-company, helicopter-manufacturing, special-operations, long-lead-production, firm-fixed-price, sole-source, aircraft-manufacturing, us-special-operations-command, pennsylvania, defense-contract-management-agency
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $723.9 million to THE BOEING COMPANY. MH-47G BLKII LOT 6 LONG LEAD PRODUCTION
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is THE BOEING COMPANY.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Defense Contract Management Agency).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $723.9 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2022-07-08. End: 2029-03-31.
What is the historical spending trend for the MH-47G Black Hawk program, and how does this award compare?
Historical spending data for the MH-47G program indicates a significant and ongoing investment by the Department of Defense, primarily to support special operations aviation requirements. The MH-47G is a specialized variant, meaning its procurement costs per unit are typically higher than standard military helicopters due to unique modifications and mission equipment. This $723.9 million award for long-lead production represents a substantial single investment, likely covering components and manufacturing processes for a future batch of aircraft or upgrades. Comparing this to previous awards requires access to detailed historical contract databases, but it aligns with the typical multi-year, high-value procurements characteristic of advanced military aviation platforms. The long-lead nature suggests a strategic decision to secure production capacity and critical components well in advance of final assembly, a common practice for complex defense systems to manage supply chains and production timelines effectively.
How does the firm fixed-price contract type impact the risk profile for both the government and the contractor?
A Firm Fixed Price (FFP) contract type places the primary risk of cost overruns on the contractor, The Boeing Company. This means Boeing is obligated to complete the work for the agreed-upon price, regardless of their actual costs. For the government, this offers significant cost certainty and predictability, making budgeting easier and reducing the risk of unexpected increases in expenditure. However, if Boeing significantly underestimates costs, they may absorb losses, potentially impacting their financial stability or future bidding behavior. Conversely, if Boeing accurately estimates or benefits from cost efficiencies, they realize a higher profit margin. The FFP structure incentivizes the contractor to control costs and improve efficiency, but it can also lead to less flexibility if changes in scope or requirements arise during the long production period, potentially necessitating contract modifications or new agreements.
What are the implications of this contract being awarded on a sole-source basis for price discovery and potential cost savings?
A sole-source award, by definition, bypasses the competitive bidding process. This means that the government did not solicit proposals from multiple potential suppliers for the MH-47G Black Hawk long-lead production. Consequently, the government cannot leverage the price discovery mechanism inherent in a competitive environment, where multiple bidders vie for the contract, potentially driving down prices through their offers. While sole-source awards are justified when only one entity possesses the necessary capabilities, technology, or production capacity, they inherently carry a higher risk of the government paying a non-competitive price. To mitigate this, the government relies heavily on robust negotiation, cost analysis, and market research to establish a 'fair and reasonable' price. Without competition, the potential for cost savings that could have been realized through a competitive process is forgone.
What is Boeing's track record with the MH-47G program and similar complex military aircraft contracts?
The Boeing Company has a long and established history with the MH-47G program, as it is the prime contractor responsible for its production and sustainment. Boeing has manufactured numerous variants of the Chinook helicopter for decades, demonstrating extensive experience and expertise in this platform. Their track record with the MH-47G specifically involves delivering specialized capabilities tailored for U.S. Special Operations Command (SOCOM). Generally, Boeing is a major defense contractor with a vast portfolio of complex aircraft programs, including fixed-wing and rotary-wing platforms for various military branches. While specific performance metrics for individual contracts are often proprietary, Boeing's continued role as a primary supplier for critical military aircraft suggests a generally satisfactory performance history, though like any large contractor, they may have faced challenges or scrutiny on specific programs over time.
Are there any specific performance risks associated with the long lead-time production of these helicopters?
Long lead-time production for complex assets like the MH-47G helicopters introduces several performance risks. Firstly, supply chain disruptions are a significant concern; the extended timeline increases the probability of component shortages, supplier issues, or geopolitical events impacting material availability. Secondly, technological obsolescence, while less likely for established platforms like the Chinook, can still be a factor if upgrades or new requirements emerge during the production cycle that necessitate design changes. Thirdly, workforce stability and knowledge transfer are critical; retaining skilled personnel over a multi-year period and ensuring effective knowledge transfer to newer employees is essential for consistent quality. Finally, the extended duration increases the potential for unforeseen manufacturing challenges or quality control issues that may only become apparent later in the production process, requiring diligent oversight and proactive risk management.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Manufacturing › Aerospace Product and Parts Manufacturing › Aircraft Manufacturing
Product/Service Code: AEROSPACE CRAFT AND STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED
Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE
Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: ROUTE 291 & STEWART AVE, RIDLEY PARK, PA, 19078
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Manufacturer of Goods, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $785,189,388
Exercised Options: $723,876,329
Current Obligation: $723,876,329
Actual Outlays: $8,477,724
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: W9121516G0001
IDV Type: BOA
Timeline
Start Date: 2022-07-08
Current End Date: 2029-03-31
Potential End Date: 2029-03-31 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2026-04-06
More Contracts from THE Boeing Company
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (Department of Defense)
- International Space Station — $22.4B (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- 200112!000108!9700!ZD60 !ballistic Missile Defense ORG. !HQ000601C0001 !A!N!*!N! !20001222!20080930!848025649!848025649!009256819!n!the Boeing Company !3370 E Miraloma AVE !anaheim !ca!92806!37000!089!01!huntsville !madison !alabama !+000383571022!n!n!000000000000!ad93!rdte/Other Defense-Adv Tech DEV !S1 !services !1caa!ballistic Missile Defense SYS !541710!*!*!3! ! ! !*!*!*!B!*!*!A! !A !U!R!2!001!B! !Z!Y!Z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! — $18.8B (Department of Defense)
- USN P-8A FRP II Long Lead Material — $18.1B (Department of Defense)
- 200512!010860!2100!w56hzv!tacom - Warren !w56hzv05c0724 !A!N! !Y! ! !20050923!20141231!016544780!016544780!009256819!n!the Boeing Company !J S Mcdonnell Blvd !saint Louis !mo!63166!65000!510!29!st. Louis !ST. Louis (city) !missouri !+000219245691!n!n!000000000000!az15!rdte/Other Research&development-Eng/Manuf Devel !S1 !services !301 !FCS !541330!E! !1! ! ! ! ! !20200930!B! ! !A! !d!u!u!1!001!n!1a!z!y!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! ! TAS::21 2040::TAS — $12.7B (Department of Defense)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)