DoD's $5.3M NAVSCIATTS support contract awarded to RMGS INC for 527 days
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $5,321,300 ($5.3M)
Contractor: Rmgs Inc
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2024-09-19
End Date: 2026-02-28
Contract Duration: 527 days
Daily Burn Rate: $10.1K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Number of Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Other
Official Description: MSOFS - NAVSCIATTS SUPPORT
Place of Performance
Location: STENNIS SPACE CENTER, HANCOCK County, MISSISSIPPI, 39529
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $5.3 million to RMGS INC for work described as: MSOFS - NAVSCIATTS SUPPORT Key points: 1. Contract awarded to RMGS INC for essential support services. 2. The contract duration is approximately 1.5 years. 3. This is a firm-fixed-price contract, indicating predictable costs. 4. The contract was awarded under full and open competition. 5. The value of the contract is over $5.3 million. 6. The contract falls under professional, scientific, and technical services. 7. The award is a delivery order, suggesting it's part of a larger framework.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract value of $5.3 million for nearly 1.5 years of support appears reasonable given the nature of specialized services. Benchmarking against similar contracts for technical and scientific support within the Department of Defense would provide a more precise value-for-money assessment. The firm-fixed-price structure helps manage cost predictability for the government.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES,' indicating that while the competition was broad, specific sources may have been excluded based on defined criteria. This suggests a competitive process was intended, but the exact number of bidders and the rationale for exclusions would be needed for a full assessment of price discovery.
Taxpayer Impact: A full and open competition generally benefits taxpayers by encouraging multiple vendors to bid, potentially driving down prices and ensuring the government receives the best value. The specific exclusion of sources warrants further review to ensure no potential cost savings were foregone.
Public Impact
This contract supports the Naval Small Craft Instruction and Technical Training (NAVSCIATTS) program. It provides essential professional, scientific, and technical services to the U.S. Special Operations Command. The services likely contribute to the training and readiness of special operations forces. The geographic impact is centered around the contract's performance location, likely within Mississippi. Workforce implications include employment for personnel at RMGS INC and potentially indirect benefits to the training community.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Potential for limited transparency if 'exclusion of sources' criteria are not clearly defined and justified.
- Dependence on a single contractor (RMGS INC) for critical support services over the contract period.
Positive Signals
- Awarded through a competitive process, suggesting potential for good value.
- Firm-fixed-price contract provides cost certainty for the government.
- Contract supports a critical national security mission (NAVSCIATTS).
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the 'All Other Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services' sector, a broad category encompassing specialized expertise. The market for such services within the defense sector is substantial, driven by the need for niche skills in training, analysis, and technical support. Comparable spending benchmarks would involve looking at other contracts for specialized training and technical assistance provided to SOCOM or similar entities.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). Therefore, there are no direct subcontracting implications or specific impacts on the small business ecosystem stemming from this particular award. Larger prime contractors are expected to manage their own resource needs.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would typically fall under the U.S. Special Operations Command, with potential involvement from the Department of Defense's Inspector General. Accountability measures are embedded in the firm-fixed-price structure and performance requirements. Transparency is facilitated through contract award databases, though detailed performance metrics may not be publicly available.
Related Government Programs
- Special Operations Forces Support
- Technical Training Services
- Professional Services Contracts
- Department of Defense Support Contracts
Risk Flags
- Potential for limited competition due to source exclusions.
- Contract performance risk associated with specialized technical services.
- Need for clear justification of excluded sources.
Tags
department-of-defense, special-operations-command, professional-scientific-technical-services, firm-fixed-price, full-and-open-competition, delivery-order, navsciatts, rmgs-inc, mississippi, training-support
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $5.3 million to RMGS INC. MSOFS - NAVSCIATTS SUPPORT
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is RMGS INC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (U.S. Special Operations Command).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $5.3 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2024-09-19. End: 2026-02-28.
What is the specific nature of the 'All Other Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services' provided under this contract?
The contract, "MSOFS - NAVSCIATTS SUPPORT," awarded to RMGS INC, falls under NAICS code 541990, 'All Other Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services.' While the specific details of the services are not fully elaborated in the provided data, the context of NAVSCIATTS (Naval Small Craft Instruction and Technical Training) suggests these services are likely related to specialized training, technical assistance, curriculum development, or operational support for small craft operations and related technologies. This could encompass areas like maritime security, special operations tactics, equipment maintenance, and instructor support for international partners. The exact scope would be detailed in the contract's statement of work.
How does the contract value of $5.3 million compare to similar support contracts for Special Operations Command?
Benchmarking the $5.3 million contract value requires comparing it to similar firm-fixed-price contracts for specialized training and technical support services awarded to U.S. Special Operations Command (SOCOM) or other branches of the Department of Defense. Without access to a comprehensive database of comparable contracts, a precise comparison is difficult. However, for a duration of approximately 1.5 years (527 days), this value suggests a moderate-sized contract. Factors influencing its value would include the criticality of the mission, the level of expertise required, the number of personnel involved, and the geographic location of performance. Contracts for highly specialized intelligence, cyber, or advanced technical training can range significantly higher.
What are the potential risks associated with a 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES' award?
A 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES' award implies that while the competition was intended to be broad, certain potential offerors were excluded based on specific criteria outlined in the solicitation. The primary risk is that these exclusions, if not well-justified and transparent, could limit the pool of qualified bidders, potentially leading to less competitive pricing or reduced innovation. Taxpayers could be at risk if the excluded sources could have offered superior value or lower costs. Ensuring the exclusion criteria are objective, necessary for the requirement, and properly documented is crucial to mitigate these risks and confirm that the government obtained the best possible outcome.
What is the track record of RMGS INC in performing similar government contracts?
Assessing the track record of RMGS INC requires reviewing their past performance on federal contracts, particularly those involving professional, scientific, and technical services for the Department of Defense or Special Operations Command. Information on past performance, including contract awards, completion history, quality of work, and any past performance issues or disputes, would be available through federal procurement databases like SAM.gov or through agency-specific performance records. A positive track record would indicate reliability and capability, while a history of issues might raise concerns about the successful execution of this current NAVSCIATTS support contract.
How does the duration of 527 days impact the overall value and risk of this contract?
The contract duration of 527 days (approximately 1 year and 5 months) is a significant factor in assessing its overall value and risk. For a firm-fixed-price contract, a longer duration allows for potential economies of scale in resource allocation and management for the contractor, which could translate into better value for the government. However, it also increases the contractor's exposure to market fluctuations (e.g., labor costs, material prices) and introduces a longer period during which performance issues could arise. From the government's perspective, a longer duration provides continuity of essential services but also requires sustained oversight and management. The risk is balanced by the fixed-price nature, which caps the government's financial exposure.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Other Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › All Other Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services
Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY
Solicitation ID: H9224020R0001
Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 4560 S BOULEVARD STE 298, VIRGINIA BEACH, VA, 23452
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Service Disabled Veteran Owned Business, Small Business, Special Designations, Subchapter S Corporation, U.S.-Owned Business, Veteran Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $5,321,300
Exercised Options: $5,321,300
Current Obligation: $5,321,300
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: H9224020D0013
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2024-09-19
Current End Date: 2026-02-28
Potential End Date: 2026-02-28 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2025-12-05
More Contracts from Rmgs Inc
- Asset Management — $8.0M (Department of Defense)
- Msofs - FFP - N2 — $5.5M (Department of Defense)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)