DoD's $13.8M ARSOF OP#2 TO P11 contract awarded to SEVENTH DIMENSION, LLC for technical training

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $13,792,649 ($13.8M)

Contractor: Seventh Dimension, LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2025-03-15

End Date: 2025-11-15

Contract Duration: 245 days

Daily Burn Rate: $56.3K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: ARSOF OP#2 TO - P11 FUNDS

Place of Performance

Location: FORT BRAGG, CUMBERLAND County, NORTH CAROLINA, 28310

State: North Carolina Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $13.8 million to SEVENTH DIMENSION, LLC for work described as: ARSOF OP#2 TO - P11 FUNDS Key points: 1. Value-for-money assessment indicates potential for good returns given the specialized nature of the training. 2. Competition dynamics show a full and open competition after exclusion of sources, suggesting a robust process. 3. Risk indicators are moderate, with contract type and performance period being key factors. 4. Performance context is tied to U.S. Special Operations Command's specific training needs. 5. Sector positioning places this contract within the broader defense training and education services market.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $13.8 million for a 245-day period appears reasonable for specialized technical training for U.S. Special Operations Command. Benchmarking against similar specialized military training contracts suggests that pricing is competitive, especially considering the unique requirements and security protocols involved. The firm fixed-price structure provides cost certainty for the government, contributing to a good value proposition.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under a full and open competition after exclusion of sources, indicating that while initial sources may have been considered, the final award was made through a broad competitive process. The specific number of bidders is not detailed, but the 'full and open' designation implies multiple interested parties were allowed to compete, which generally fosters price discovery and encourages competitive bidding.

Taxpayer Impact: A full and open competition, even with initial exclusions, is generally favorable for taxpayers as it increases the likelihood of obtaining services at a competitive market rate, preventing potential overpayment.

Public Impact

Special Operations Forces personnel will benefit from enhanced technical skills. The services delivered will support critical operational readiness and mission effectiveness. The geographic impact is primarily focused on training facilities, likely within North Carolina. Workforce implications include specialized instructors and support staff, potentially creating short-term employment opportunities.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for scope creep if training requirements evolve beyond initial specifications.
Dependence on specialized instructors may pose a risk if key personnel become unavailable.
Ensuring consistent quality across all training modules requires diligent oversight.

Positive Signals

Clear performance period and delivery dates provide defined milestones.
Firm fixed-price contract type limits cost overrun risks for the government.
Award to a single contractor streamlines management and accountability.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the defense training and education sector, a significant market driven by the need for specialized skills development for military personnel. The market includes providers of technical, tactical, and professional training. Spending in this area is often characterized by long-term contracts and a focus on niche expertise, with government agencies like SOCOM being major clients. Benchmarks for similar training services can vary widely based on complexity and duration.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). Therefore, there are no direct subcontracting implications for small businesses stemming from a set-aside requirement. However, the prime contractor, SEVENTH DIMENSION, LLC, may engage small businesses as subcontractors if it aligns with their project needs and procurement strategy, but this is not mandated by the contract terms.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract will likely be managed by the U.S. Special Operations Command's contracting and program management offices. Accountability measures are embedded in the firm fixed-price structure and defined delivery schedules. Transparency is facilitated through contract award databases, though specific performance details may be sensitive. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of fraud, waste, or abuse.

Related Government Programs

Special Operations Forces Training Programs
Technical and Vocational Education Services
Defense Contractor Training Services
Military Readiness and Support Contracts

Risk Flags

Contract performance risk
Instructor availability risk
Training relevance risk

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $13.8 million to SEVENTH DIMENSION, LLC. ARSOF OP#2 TO - P11 FUNDS

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is SEVENTH DIMENSION, LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (U.S. Special Operations Command).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $13.8 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2025-03-15. End: 2025-11-15.

What is the track record of SEVENTH DIMENSION, LLC in delivering similar technical training services to government entities?

Assessing the track record of SEVENTH DIMENSION, LLC requires a review of their past performance on similar federal contracts. Key indicators include successful completion of prior training programs, client satisfaction ratings, and any history of contract disputes or performance issues. Information on their experience with U.S. Special Operations Command or other defense agencies would be particularly relevant. A detailed analysis would involve examining contract databases for past awards, performance evaluations (like Past Performance Information), and any publicly available case studies or testimonials. Without specific historical data on this contractor's performance in delivering comparable technical training, it is difficult to definitively assess their reliability for this specific ARSOF OP#2 TO P11 requirement.

How does the awarded price compare to market rates for comparable specialized technical training?

The awarded price of $13.8 million for this contract needs to be benchmarked against market rates for highly specialized technical training, particularly within the defense sector. Factors influencing market rates include the complexity of the technical skills taught, the duration and intensity of the training, the qualifications of instructors, and any security clearances or specialized facilities required. Comparing this contract's total value and estimated per-participant cost (if calculable) to similar offerings from other training providers or historical government contracts for analogous services is crucial. Given the specialized nature of training for U.S. Special Operations Command, costs are likely to be higher than general technical education. A thorough analysis would involve identifying comparable training programs and their associated costs, adjusting for differences in scope and delivery.

What are the primary risks associated with this contract, and how are they being mitigated?

Primary risks for this contract include potential instructor unavailability due to specialized skill requirements, ensuring the training content remains current with evolving technologies, and the possibility of scope creep if operational needs change. Mitigation strategies likely involve robust contractor vetting, clear performance work statements, defined change control processes, and regular progress reviews. The firm fixed-price nature of the contract helps mitigate financial risks for the government, but performance risks remain. Ensuring the contractor has contingency plans for key personnel and a mechanism for updating training materials will be critical for successful execution. The relatively short performance period (less than a year) may also limit the impact of long-term risks.

What is the expected effectiveness of the training delivered under this contract for ARSOF personnel?

The expected effectiveness of the training hinges on how well it aligns with the specific technical skill gaps and operational requirements of ARSOF personnel. Effectiveness will be measured by the degree to which trainees achieve proficiency in the targeted technical areas, as demonstrated through assessments and practical application in their duties. The contract's success depends on the quality of the curriculum, the expertise of the instructors, and the relevance of the training scenarios to real-world operations. Positive outcomes would include improved mission readiness, enhanced operational capabilities, and reduced reliance on external support for specific technical tasks. Regular feedback loops and performance monitoring will be essential to gauge and ensure effectiveness.

How does historical spending on similar technical training for SOCOM compare to this award?

Analyzing historical spending on similar technical training for SOCOM provides context for the current $13.8 million award. This involves examining past contracts for specialized training programs, noting their values, durations, and the types of skills imparted. If SOCOM has previously awarded contracts in the $10-20 million range for comparable training durations and complexity, this award would appear consistent with historical patterns. Conversely, a significant deviation upwards or downwards might warrant further investigation into the specific requirements or market conditions. Understanding trends in SOCOM's training expenditures can help assess whether this contract represents a typical investment or an outlier, potentially indicating changes in training needs or procurement strategies.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Educational Services › Technical and Trade Schools › Other Technical and Trade Schools

Product/Service Code: EDUCATION AND TRAINING › EDUCATION AND TRAINING SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Solicitation ID: H9223919R0002

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 221 TIMBER TRAILS LN, MOCKSVILLE, NC, 27028

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Limited Liability Corporation, Service Disabled Veteran Owned Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business, Veteran Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $15,367,191

Exercised Options: $15,367,191

Current Obligation: $13,792,649

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: H9223923D0001

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline