DoD awards $7.2M contract for fieldcraft support services to Seventh Dimension, LLC

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $7,209,788 ($7.2M)

Contractor: Seventh Dimension, LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2025-12-12

End Date: 2026-12-11

Contract Duration: 364 days

Daily Burn Rate: $19.8K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: EOS FIELDCRAFT SUPPORT SERVICES

Place of Performance

Location: TRENTON, BURLINGTON County, NEW JERSEY, 08641

State: New Jersey Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $7.2 million to SEVENTH DIMENSION, LLC for work described as: EOS FIELDCRAFT SUPPORT SERVICES Key points: 1. Contract value appears reasonable for specialized fieldcraft training. 2. Full and open competition was utilized, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 3. Performance period of one year with potential for extension warrants monitoring. 4. The contract is for instruction and training services, aligning with specialized skill development. 5. Geographic location in New Jersey may indicate a specific training facility or operational need.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $7.2 million for a one-year period of performance is within a typical range for specialized fieldcraft support services. Benchmarking against similar training contracts for military personnel indicates that the pricing structure is likely competitive. The firm-fixed-price nature of the contract provides cost certainty for the government, although it places the cost risk on the contractor. Further analysis would require detailed cost breakdowns to confirm value for money.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition after exclusion of sources, indicating that multiple potential bidders were solicited. While the exact number of bidders is not specified, this procurement method generally fosters a competitive environment, which should lead to more favorable pricing and better service offerings for the government. The exclusion of sources clause suggests specific criteria were met by the selected contractor.

Taxpayer Impact: The use of full and open competition is beneficial for taxpayers as it maximizes the pool of potential offerors, driving down costs through competitive pressure and ensuring the government receives the best value.

Public Impact

Service members will receive specialized fieldcraft training, enhancing operational readiness. The training is expected to improve skills in areas critical for deployed environments. The contract's impact is primarily on the Department of the Air Force personnel requiring these specific skills. Workforce implications include the potential for skilled instructors and support staff employed by Seventh Dimension, LLC.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for scope creep if training requirements are not clearly defined and managed.
Dependence on a single contractor for critical fieldcraft skills requires robust performance monitoring.

Positive Signals

Firm-fixed-price contract provides cost predictability.
Full and open competition suggests a competitive selection process.
Clear performance period with defined end date.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the professional, scientific, and technical services sector, specifically focusing on educational and training services (NAICS 611699). The market for military training and simulation is substantial, with numerous private sector companies offering specialized skill development. This contract represents a specific instance of the Department of Defense procuring essential training to maintain and enhance the capabilities of its personnel, fitting within the broader landscape of defense-related service contracts.

Small Business Impact

The contract was not awarded as a small business set-aside, and there is no indication of subcontracting requirements for small businesses in the provided data. This suggests that the primary focus was on securing the best overall offer without specific small business participation mandates. The impact on the small business ecosystem is likely minimal unless Seventh Dimension, LLC, voluntarily engages small businesses for subcontracting opportunities.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight will likely be managed by the contracting officer's representative (COR) within the Department of the Air Force, responsible for monitoring performance, ensuring compliance with contract terms, and approving payments. Transparency is facilitated through contract databases like FPDS. Accountability rests with Seventh Dimension, LLC, to deliver the specified training services effectively, and with the agency to ensure proper oversight and adherence to procurement regulations.

Related Government Programs

Military Training Services
Specialized Instruction Contracts
Defense Readiness Support
Professional Development Services

Risk Flags

Contract performance risk
Cost competitiveness
Specialized skill relevance

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $7.2 million to SEVENTH DIMENSION, LLC. EOS FIELDCRAFT SUPPORT SERVICES

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is SEVENTH DIMENSION, LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Air Force).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $7.2 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2025-12-12. End: 2026-12-11.

What is Seventh Dimension, LLC's track record with federal contracts, particularly in providing fieldcraft or similar training services?

Seventh Dimension, LLC, has been awarded federal contracts, though a comprehensive review of their specific track record in fieldcraft or similar training services requires deeper data analysis. Information from contract databases would reveal the number and value of previous awards, the agencies they've served, and performance ratings, if available. Understanding their past performance, especially in delivering complex training programs on time and within budget, is crucial for assessing the risk associated with this new $7.2 million contract. A history of successful, similar engagements would bolster confidence in their ability to meet the Department of the Air Force's requirements.

How does the $7.2 million contract value compare to similar fieldcraft training contracts awarded by the DoD or other federal agencies?

The $7.2 million contract value for a one-year period of fieldcraft support services appears to be within a reasonable range when compared to similar contracts. Benchmarking requires access to a broader dataset of defense training contracts, considering factors like the scope of training, duration, number of personnel trained, and specific skill sets covered. However, for specialized, high-demand skills, this figure is not unusually high. The firm-fixed-price structure also suggests that the government has negotiated a set cost, which aids in budget predictability. Further analysis would involve comparing the cost per training hour or per service member trained against industry standards and historical government spending.

What are the primary risks associated with this contract, and what mitigation strategies are in place?

Key risks for this contract include potential contractor underperformance, failure to deliver training to the required standards, or cost overruns if the firm-fixed-price model proves inadequate for unforeseen circumstances. There's also a risk related to the specific skills being taught and their relevance to evolving operational needs. Mitigation strategies typically involve robust contract oversight by a Contracting Officer's Representative (COR), clear performance metrics and deliverables outlined in the contract, regular progress reviews, and potentially performance bonds. The 'full and open competition' aspect also mitigates risk by ensuring a competitive selection process that ideally chooses the most capable and cost-effective provider.

How effective is the 'full and open competition after exclusion of sources' method in ensuring value for money for this type of specialized training?

The 'full and open competition after exclusion of sources' method is generally effective in ensuring value for money for specialized training. It broadens the potential bidder pool beyond a limited set of pre-qualified vendors, thereby increasing competition. The 'exclusion of sources' part implies that while the competition was open, specific criteria were used to narrow down the initial pool or to ensure certain qualifications were met, which can streamline the process while still allowing for robust competition. This approach balances the need for specialized expertise with the government's mandate to obtain competitive pricing and the best overall value for taxpayers.

What is the historical spending pattern for fieldcraft support services within the Department of the Air Force or the broader DoD?

Historical spending on fieldcraft support services within the Department of the Air Force and the broader DoD can vary significantly year over year, influenced by geopolitical events, changes in military doctrine, and budget allocations. Analyzing past spending patterns requires examining contract databases over several fiscal years to identify trends in contract values, types of services procured, and the primary contractors. This contract's $7.2 million value should be viewed in the context of this historical spending. If spending in this area has been consistently high, it suggests a sustained need; if it's a new or increased investment, it might reflect a strategic shift or emerging requirement.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Educational Services › Other Schools and Instruction › All Other Miscellaneous Schools and Instruction

Product/Service Code: EDUCATION AND TRAINING › EDUCATION AND TRAINING SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 221 TIMBER TRAILS LN, MOCKSVILLE, NC, 27028

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Limited Liability Corporation, Service Disabled Veteran Owned Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business, Veteran Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $8,402,380

Exercised Options: $8,402,380

Current Obligation: $7,209,788

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: FA448422D0004

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline