DoD's $28.2M Medical Instructor Support contract awarded to 1Prospect Technologies, LLC, with 8 bidders
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $28,202,753 ($28.2M)
Contractor: 1prospect Technologies, LLC
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2018-11-01
End Date: 2024-05-08
Contract Duration: 2,015 days
Daily Burn Rate: $14.0K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Number of Offers Received: 8
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Other
Official Description: JSOMTC MEDICAL INSTRUCTOR SUPPORT SVCS
Place of Performance
Location: FAYETTEVILLE, CUMBERLAND County, NORTH CAROLINA, 28303
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $28.2 million to 1PROSPECT TECHNOLOGIES, LLC for work described as: JSOMTC MEDICAL INSTRUCTOR SUPPORT SVCS Key points: 1. The contract's value of $28.2 million over its duration suggests a significant investment in specialized training services. 2. With 8 bidders, the competition level indicates a healthy market interest in providing these critical support services. 3. The firm-fixed-price contract type helps mitigate cost overrun risks for the government. 4. The contract's performance period spans over five years, suggesting a need for sustained and reliable support. 5. This contract falls under professional, scientific, and technical services, a broad category with diverse applications. 6. The award to 1Prospect Technologies, LLC, highlights their capability in securing substantial government contracts within this sector.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The total award amount of $28.2 million for medical instructor support services over approximately five years appears reasonable given the specialized nature of the services. Benchmarking against similar contracts for specialized training and technical support within the Department of Defense suggests that the pricing is competitive. The firm-fixed-price structure further enhances value by fixing the government's cost exposure, allowing for predictable budgeting. Without specific per-unit data, a direct cost comparison is challenging, but the overall contract value aligns with the scope of providing sustained instructional support.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
This contract was awarded under full and open competition, with 8 bidders vying for the opportunity. The presence of multiple bidders suggests a robust and competitive market for these specialized medical instructor support services. A higher number of bidders generally leads to better price discovery and potentially more innovative solutions, as contractors strive to differentiate themselves. The competition level indicates that the U.S. Special Operations Command was able to solicit a wide range of qualified vendors, fostering a dynamic bidding environment.
Taxpayer Impact: The extensive competition for this contract is beneficial for taxpayers, as it likely drove down prices and ensured the government received competitive offers. This process helps prevent overpayment and encourages efficiency among contractors seeking to win these valuable awards.
Public Impact
Special Operations Forces personnel benefit from highly skilled and specialized medical instruction, enhancing their readiness and operational effectiveness. The services delivered include crucial training that supports the unique medical needs of special operations missions. The geographic impact is likely focused on locations where U.S. Special Operations Command units are stationed or deployed. Workforce implications include the employment of experienced medical instructors and support staff by the prime contractor and potentially subcontractors.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Potential for scope creep if training requirements are not clearly defined and managed.
- Reliance on a single contractor for critical instructor support could pose a risk if performance issues arise.
- Ensuring the continued relevance and up-to-date nature of medical training content is crucial.
Positive Signals
- The firm-fixed-price contract type provides cost certainty for the government.
- Full and open competition suggests a strong pool of qualified vendors was available.
- The contract's duration indicates a stable, long-term need for these services, allowing for consistent support.
Sector Analysis
The market for professional, scientific, and technical services, particularly those supporting specialized government functions like military training, is substantial. This contract fits within the broader defense training and support sector, which is characterized by a need for highly specialized expertise. Comparable spending benchmarks in this area often involve significant investments in simulation, curriculum development, and subject matter expert instruction. The industry is competitive, with a mix of large defense contractors and specialized small businesses vying for these opportunities.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates that this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). Therefore, the primary impact on the small business ecosystem would be through potential subcontracting opportunities. Prime contractors like 1Prospect Technologies, LLC, may engage small businesses for specialized support services, contributing to their revenue and growth. However, without specific subcontracting plans or goals, the direct benefit to small businesses remains uncertain.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the U.S. Special Operations Command contracting and program management offices. Accountability measures are embedded within the contract terms, including performance standards and reporting requirements. Transparency is facilitated through contract award databases and public reporting mechanisms. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of suspected fraud, waste, or abuse related to the contract's execution.
Related Government Programs
- Special Operations Forces Training Programs
- Medical Readiness Support Services
- Defense Contractor Training Services
- Professional and Technical Services Contracts
- Government Training and Education Contracts
Risk Flags
- Potential for performance issues if contractor fails to maintain qualified instructors.
- Risk of training content becoming outdated if not regularly reviewed and updated.
- Dependence on a single contractor for critical support services.
Tags
defense, department-of-defense, u.s.-special-operations-command, professional-scientific-and-technical-services, instructor-support, medical-training, firm-fixed-price, full-and-open-competition, definitive-contract, north-carolina, large-contract
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $28.2 million to 1PROSPECT TECHNOLOGIES, LLC. JSOMTC MEDICAL INSTRUCTOR SUPPORT SVCS
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is 1PROSPECT TECHNOLOGIES, LLC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (U.S. Special Operations Command).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $28.2 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2018-11-01. End: 2024-05-08.
What is the track record of 1Prospect Technologies, LLC in delivering similar medical instructor support services to the Department of Defense?
Assessing the track record of 1Prospect Technologies, LLC requires a review of their past performance on similar contracts. This would involve examining contract histories, past performance evaluations, and any documented successes or challenges in providing specialized medical instruction and support. Information from sources like the Federal Procurement Data System (FPDS) and contractor performance assessment reporting (CPARS) would be crucial. A strong track record would indicate a history of meeting performance requirements, delivering quality services, and managing contracts effectively within the defense sector. Conversely, any documented performance issues or disputes could raise concerns about their ability to meet the demands of this significant contract. Without specific past performance data readily available in this summary, further investigation into their contract history is recommended.
How does the per-contractor value compare to other similar medical instructor support contracts awarded by the DoD?
Directly comparing the per-contractor value requires identifying comparable contracts for medical instructor support services within the Department of Defense. This involves analyzing contracts with similar scopes of work, duration, and service levels. The total award of $28.2 million over approximately five years suggests an average annual value of around $5.6 million. Benchmarking this against other contracts would involve looking at the average value of similar training and support services. Factors such as the complexity of the medical training, the specific skill sets required of instructors, and the geographic locations of service delivery would influence these comparisons. A higher average value for comparable contracts might indicate this award is within market norms, while a significantly lower average could suggest potential overpricing or a less comprehensive scope.
What are the primary risks associated with this contract, and how are they being mitigated?
Primary risks associated with this contract could include the potential for instructor attrition, ensuring the continuous relevance and accuracy of medical training content, and managing the logistical complexities of providing support across potentially dispersed locations. Instructor attrition could lead to gaps in training delivery, while outdated content could compromise the effectiveness of the instruction. Mitigation strategies likely involve robust contractor personnel management plans, regular curriculum review and updates, and clear performance metrics tied to service delivery. The firm-fixed-price nature of the contract helps mitigate financial risks for the government, but performance risks remain. The U.S. Special Operations Command would likely have oversight mechanisms to monitor contractor performance and address any emerging issues proactively.
What is the historical spending pattern for medical instructor support services by the U.S. Special Operations Command?
Analyzing the historical spending pattern for medical instructor support services by the U.S. Special Operations Command (USSOCOM) would involve reviewing contract awards over several fiscal years. This would help determine if the $28.2 million award represents a typical investment level or a significant increase/decrease in spending for these services. Trends in spending could indicate evolving training needs, changes in operational tempo, or shifts in procurement strategies. Understanding this historical context is crucial for assessing the current contract's significance and for future budget planning. Data from FPDS would be essential for this analysis, allowing for the aggregation of spending on similar service categories over time.
How does the competition level of 8 bidders impact the government's ability to secure favorable pricing and terms?
A competition level of 8 bidders for this contract is generally considered robust and is highly beneficial for the government in securing favorable pricing and terms. With a larger pool of qualified vendors, the government has a greater opportunity to receive a wide range of proposals, including competitive pricing. This increased competition drives down costs as contractors vie to win the award by offering their best value. Furthermore, a competitive environment can lead to better terms and conditions, as contractors are motivated to meet the government's requirements effectively to secure the contract. It also reduces the risk of vendor lock-in and provides leverage for the government during negotiations.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Other Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › All Other Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services
Product/Service Code: EDUCATION AND TRAINING › EDUCATION AND TRAINING SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Solicitation ID: H9223918R0011
Offers Received: 8
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: 1prospect Technologies LLC
Address: 3215 W STATE ST STE 309A, MILWAUKEE, WI, 53208
Business Categories: 8(a) Program Participant, Category Business, Corporate Entity Tax Exempt, Limited Liability Corporation, Minority Owned Business, Native American Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, Tribally Owned Firm, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $28,202,927
Exercised Options: $28,202,804
Current Obligation: $28,202,753
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Timeline
Start Date: 2018-11-01
Current End Date: 2024-05-08
Potential End Date: 2024-05-08 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2024-12-18
More Contracts from 1prospect Technologies, LLC
- Fort Detrick, MD Information Technology Services — $18.3M (Department of Defense)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)