Leidos, Inc. contract for drinking water program information flow valued at $42.6M

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $42,550,806 ($42.6M)

Contractor: Leidos, Inc.

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2004-07-09

End Date: 2007-01-31

Contract Duration: 936 days

Daily Burn Rate: $45.5K/day

Number of Offers Received: 5

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: FACILITATE THE FLOW OF INFORMATION THROUGHOUT THE DRINKING WATER PROGRAM SO DECISION MAKERS/ANALYST HAVE THE NEEDED DATA TO ENSURE PUBLIC SAFTY.

Place of Performance

Location: SACRAMENTO, SACRAMENTO County, CALIFORNIA, 95821

State: California Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $42.6 million to LEIDOS, INC. for work described as: FACILITATE THE FLOW OF INFORMATION THROUGHOUT THE DRINKING WATER PROGRAM SO DECISION MAKERS/ANALYST HAVE THE NEEDED DATA TO ENSURE PUBLIC SAFTY. Key points: 1. Contract aims to improve data flow for drinking water program decision-makers, enhancing public safety. 2. The contract duration of 936 days suggests a medium-term project. 3. Fixed-price contract type indicates a defined scope and budget, potentially limiting cost overruns. 4. The award was made by the General Services Administration, a common civilian agency. 5. The contract was awarded in 2004 and completed in 2007, indicating historical relevance. 6. The contract's focus on information flow is critical for effective program management and public health. 7. The value of the contract, approximately $42.6 million, suggests a significant investment in data management for a vital public service.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $42.6 million over approximately 3 years for facilitating information flow within a drinking water program appears reasonable. Benchmarking against similar IT services contracts for government agencies suggests that costs for data management and system integration can vary widely, but this figure does not immediately raise red flags for overpricing given the critical nature of public safety data. The fixed-price nature of the contract provides a degree of cost certainty.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: unknown

The competition level for this contract is not specified in the provided data. Without knowing if it was competed full and open, limited, or sole-source, it's difficult to assess the effectiveness of the procurement process. A full and open competition typically leads to better price discovery and potentially lower costs for the government. If it was a limited or sole-source award, the rationale behind that decision would be crucial for evaluating value for money.

Taxpayer Impact: The level of competition directly impacts taxpayer value. Higher competition generally drives down prices, ensuring that taxpayer funds are used more efficiently. If this contract was not competitively bid, taxpayers may have paid a premium.

Public Impact

Public safety is enhanced through improved decision-making in the drinking water program. Government analysts and decision-makers gain access to necessary data for program oversight. The contract supports the operational efficiency of federal drinking water initiatives. Improved data flow can lead to more effective identification and mitigation of water quality risks. The ultimate beneficiaries are the public, through safer drinking water.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

  • Lack of transparency regarding the competition method makes it difficult to assess value for money.
  • The age of the contract (2004-2007) means current market rates and technologies may differ significantly.
  • Specific performance metrics and outcomes are not detailed, hindering a full assessment of effectiveness.

Positive Signals

  • The contract's objective directly addresses a critical public safety need (drinking water program).
  • The fixed-price contract type offers budget predictability.
  • The award to a known entity like Leidos, Inc. suggests a level of established capability.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Information Technology and Government Services sector, specifically focusing on data management and flow for a regulatory program. The market for IT services supporting government functions is substantial, with agencies investing heavily in systems to manage vast amounts of data for public safety, environmental protection, and operational efficiency. Comparable spending benchmarks would typically be found within IT services procurements for data warehousing, system integration, and business intelligence solutions for federal agencies.

Small Business Impact

Information regarding small business set-asides or subcontracting is not provided. Without this data, it's impossible to assess the impact on the small business ecosystem or whether opportunities were specifically allocated to small businesses for this contract.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight mechanisms and accountability measures are not detailed in the provided data. As a contract awarded by the General Services Administration, it would likely fall under standard federal procurement regulations and oversight. However, specific details on performance monitoring, reporting requirements, and the role of any inspector general are absent.

Related Government Programs

  • Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Drinking Water Programs
  • Federal Information Technology Acquisition Reform Act (FITARA) related initiatives
  • Government Data Management Services
  • Public Health Infrastructure Support

Risk Flags

  • Contract age may limit relevance of performance data to current standards.
  • Lack of competition details hinders value assessment.
  • Specific performance outcomes and metrics are not provided.

Tags

it-services, data-management, drinking-water-program, public-safety, fixed-price, general-services-administration, leidos-inc, california, medium-value, historical-contract

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $42.6 million to LEIDOS, INC.. FACILITATE THE FLOW OF INFORMATION THROUGHOUT THE DRINKING WATER PROGRAM SO DECISION MAKERS/ANALYST HAVE THE NEEDED DATA TO ENSURE PUBLIC SAFTY.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is LEIDOS, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Federal Acquisition Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $42.6 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2004-07-09. End: 2007-01-31.

What specific technologies or platforms were utilized to facilitate the flow of information throughout the drinking water program?

The provided data does not specify the exact technologies or platforms used under this contract. However, given the contract's objective of facilitating information flow for a government program, it likely involved database management systems, data integration tools, potentially custom-built software for data aggregation and reporting, and secure network infrastructure. The focus would have been on ensuring data integrity, accessibility, and timely delivery to decision-makers. Without further details on the contract's statement of work or technical specifications, a precise list of technologies cannot be determined. This information would typically be found in contract award documents or performance reports.

How does the $42.6 million contract value compare to similar IT services contracts for government data management programs?

Comparing the $42.6 million contract value requires context regarding the specific services rendered and the duration. For a 3-year period (July 2004 - January 2007), this equates to roughly $14.2 million per year. This figure is within the range for significant IT services contracts supporting federal agencies, particularly those involving data management, system integration, and program support. However, without knowing the scope (e.g., number of users, complexity of data, specific functionalities), it's challenging to provide a precise benchmark. Contracts for enterprise-wide data warehousing, complex analytics platforms, or large-scale system modernization can easily exceed this amount annually. Conversely, smaller, more focused data management tasks would be significantly less.

What were the key performance indicators (KPIs) used to measure the success of this contract?

The provided data does not include specific Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) for this contract. Typically, for a contract focused on facilitating information flow, KPIs might have included metrics related to data accuracy, data availability (uptime), report generation timeliness, reduction in data processing errors, user satisfaction with data accessibility, and the successful integration of disparate data sources. The ultimate measure of success would be whether decision-makers had the necessary data to ensure public safety effectively. Without access to the contract's statement of work or performance evaluations, these KPIs remain speculative.

What is Leidos, Inc.'s track record with similar government contracts related to environmental or public safety programs?

Leidos, Inc. (and its predecessor companies like SAIC) has a substantial track record with government contracts, including those related to environmental programs, public safety, and critical infrastructure. They have historically been involved in large-scale IT services, systems engineering, and program management for various federal agencies. Their experience often spans areas like environmental monitoring, data analytics for public health, cybersecurity for critical systems, and scientific research support. While this specific contract is from the mid-2000s, Leidos has continued to secure and perform on complex government IT and mission support contracts, indicating a sustained capability in these domains.

Were there any identified risks or challenges during the performance of this contract, and how were they addressed?

The provided data does not detail specific risks or challenges encountered during the performance of this contract. Common risks in such IT and data management contracts can include scope creep, technical integration issues, data security vulnerabilities, delays in government-provided information or access, and contractor performance issues. Addressing these typically involves proactive project management, clear communication protocols, change control processes, robust cybersecurity measures, and regular performance reviews. Without specific documentation from the contract period, it's impossible to identify the actual risks faced and their mitigation strategies.

How has federal spending on drinking water program IT infrastructure evolved since this contract was awarded?

Federal spending on drinking water program IT infrastructure has likely increased significantly since this contract (2004-2007). Advancements in technology, such as cloud computing, big data analytics, IoT sensors for real-time monitoring, and enhanced cybersecurity requirements, have driven greater investment. Agencies like the EPA, which oversees drinking water standards, have increasingly relied on sophisticated IT systems for data collection, analysis, compliance tracking, and public communication. The trend has been towards more integrated, data-driven approaches to environmental protection and public health, necessitating continuous upgrades and investments in IT infrastructure and services.

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Leidos Holdings, Inc. (UEI: 611641312)

Address: 10260 CAMPUS POINT DR, SAN DIEGO, CA, 90

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $42,556,904

Exercised Options: $42,556,904

Current Obligation: $42,550,806

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: GS09K99BHD0010

IDV Type: GWAC

Timeline

Start Date: 2004-07-09

Current End Date: 2007-01-31

Potential End Date: 2007-01-31 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2011-04-14

More Contracts from Leidos, Inc.

View all Leidos, Inc. federal contracts →

Other General Services Administration Contracts

View all General Services Administration contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending