Leidos Inc. awarded $12.3M for defense review and strategic planning support
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $12,330,763 ($12.3M)
Contractor: Leidos, Inc.
Awarding Agency: General Services Administration
Start Date: 2004-08-13
End Date: 2009-04-30
Contract Duration: 1,721 days
Daily Burn Rate: $7.2K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS
Sector: Defense
Official Description: DEFENSE REVIEW/STRATEGIC PLANNING TECHNICAL AND ANALYTICAL SUPPORT
Place of Performance
Location: WASHINGTON, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA County, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 20330
Plain-Language Summary
General Services Administration obligated $12.3 million to LEIDOS, INC. for work described as: DEFENSE REVIEW/STRATEGIC PLANNING TECHNICAL AND ANALYTICAL SUPPORT Key points: 1. Contract provides critical analytical and technical support for defense strategy. 2. Awarded via full and open competition, suggesting a robust bidding process. 3. Contract duration of over 5 years indicates a long-term need for these services. 4. Time and Materials contract type may pose cost control challenges. 5. Services align with administrative management and general management consulting. 6. Geographic focus on Washington D.C. highlights proximity to key decision-makers.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract value of $12.3 million over approximately five years suggests a moderate annual spend for specialized consulting services. Benchmarking against similar contracts for defense strategic planning and technical support is difficult without more granular data on the specific deliverables and labor categories. The Time and Materials (T&M) pricing structure, while flexible, can lead to cost overruns if not closely managed, potentially impacting overall value for money compared to fixed-price contracts.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. The presence of multiple bidders, though not explicitly stated in the provided data, is implied by this competition type. This approach generally fosters price discovery and allows the government to select the offer that best meets its technical and cost requirements.
Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition is favorable for taxpayers as it typically drives down prices through market forces and encourages a wider range of innovative solutions.
Public Impact
Benefits the Department of Defense by providing essential strategic planning and review capabilities. Services delivered include technical and analytical support for complex defense initiatives. Geographic impact is concentrated in Washington D.C., where key defense policy is formulated. Workforce implications involve specialized consultants contributing to national security planning.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Time and Materials contract type can lead to unpredictable costs if not managed diligently.
- Lack of specific performance metrics makes it challenging to assess the effectiveness of the strategic planning support.
- The broad nature of 'Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services' may obscure the precise value delivered.
Positive Signals
- Awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a competitive pricing environment.
- Long contract duration indicates a sustained need and potential for building deep expertise.
- Contractor (Leidos, Inc.) is a well-established entity in government contracting, implying a degree of reliability.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the professional services sector, specifically management and consulting. The market for defense review and strategic planning support is substantial, driven by the continuous need for adaptation and modernization within military and intelligence agencies. Leidos, Inc. operates in a competitive landscape with numerous firms offering similar capabilities. Spending benchmarks for such services can vary widely based on scope, duration, and the specific expertise required.
Small Business Impact
The provided data indicates that this contract was not set aside for small businesses (sb: false) and does not specify any small business subcontracting goals (ss: false). Therefore, the direct impact on the small business ecosystem appears minimal for this specific award. However, large prime contractors like Leidos, Inc. often engage small businesses for specialized support, though this is not detailed here.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the contracting officer and program managers within the General Services Administration (GSA) and the benefiting defense agency. Accountability measures would be tied to the contract's performance clauses and deliverables. Transparency is generally facilitated through contract databases like FPDS, where basic award information is publicly available. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of fraud, waste, or abuse.
Related Government Programs
- Defense Planning and Analysis Services
- Strategic Consulting for Government Agencies
- Technical Support for Military Operations
- Management Consulting for Federal Programs
Risk Flags
- Potential for cost overruns due to Time and Materials pricing.
- Broad service description may lack specificity for performance evaluation.
- Limited transparency on specific deliverables and outcomes.
Tags
defense, consulting, strategic-planning, technical-support, leidos-inc, general-services-administration, time-and-materials, full-and-open-competition, district-of-columbia, administrative-management, general-management-consulting
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
General Services Administration awarded $12.3 million to LEIDOS, INC.. DEFENSE REVIEW/STRATEGIC PLANNING TECHNICAL AND ANALYTICAL SUPPORT
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is LEIDOS, INC..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Federal Acquisition Service).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $12.3 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2004-08-13. End: 2009-04-30.
What is Leidos, Inc.'s track record with similar defense consulting contracts?
Leidos, Inc. has a significant history of performing complex technical, engineering, and management support services for various U.S. government agencies, including the Department of Defense. Their portfolio often includes strategic planning, systems engineering, cybersecurity, and IT modernization. While this specific contract focuses on 'DEFENSE REVIEW/STRATEGIC PLANNING TECHNICAL AND ANALYTICAL SUPPORT,' Leidos has demonstrated capabilities across a broad spectrum of defense-related needs. Analyzing their past performance on similar large-scale, long-duration contracts would involve reviewing award data, past performance evaluations (if publicly available), and any reported issues or successes to gauge their reliability and effectiveness in delivering strategic insights and technical analysis within the defense sector.
How does the $12.3 million value compare to other defense strategic planning contracts?
The $12.3 million total value over approximately five years translates to an average annual value of roughly $2.46 million. This figure places it in the mid-range for strategic planning and technical support contracts within the defense sector. Larger, more comprehensive strategic initiatives or those involving extensive research and development could easily exceed tens or hundreds of millions of dollars annually. Conversely, smaller, more focused advisory roles might be valued in the hundreds of thousands. Without specific details on the scope of work, deliverables, and the specific defense agencies involved, a precise comparison is challenging. However, this award suggests a significant, ongoing need for specialized analytical support rather than a short-term, high-intensity project.
What are the primary risks associated with this Time and Materials contract?
The primary risk with a Time and Materials (T&M) contract, like this one, is the potential for cost escalation. Unlike fixed-price contracts, T&M agreements reimburse the contractor for direct labor hours at specified rates and for the actual cost of materials. If project scope creeps, inefficiencies arise, or labor hours are not meticulously tracked and managed, costs can significantly exceed initial estimates. For the government, this necessitates robust oversight to ensure that hours billed are reasonable and necessary, and that the work performed aligns with the contract's objectives. The lack of a predefined ceiling on total cost (though often present in practice) can make budget forecasting more difficult and potentially lead to less favorable value for money if not managed proactively.
How effective is 'Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services' for defense strategy?
The classification 'Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services' (NAICS 541611) is broad and encompasses a wide range of advisory functions. For defense strategy, this classification implies support in areas such as organizational efficiency, process improvement, policy development, and strategic planning implementation. The effectiveness hinges entirely on the specific tasks performed under the contract and the expertise of the contractor's personnel. If the services provided are tailored to address critical defense challenges, leverage deep analytical capabilities, and result in actionable recommendations that enhance strategic decision-making, then the classification is appropriate. However, if the work is more generic administrative support, its strategic impact might be limited. The value is derived from the quality of the analysis and the strategic insights delivered, not solely the NAICS code.
What does the contract's duration of over 5 years imply about historical spending patterns?
A contract duration exceeding five years, including potential option periods, suggests a sustained and consistent requirement for the services being procured. For historical spending patterns, this indicates that the need for defense review and strategic planning technical and analytical support is not a one-off requirement but an ongoing function. Agencies likely have budgeted for and utilized similar services over previous periods, leading to the establishment of this long-term contract vehicle. It implies a pattern of recurring needs for strategic foresight, policy analysis, and technical assessments within the defense establishment, suggesting that funds have been allocated and spent on these types of services consistently over time.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services › Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services
Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › MANAGEMENT SUPPORT SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY
Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS (Y)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 1710 SAIC DRIVE, ROOM #8031, MCLEAN, VA, 90
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $12,330,763
Exercised Options: $12,330,763
Current Obligation: $12,330,763
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: GS23F8006H
IDV Type: FSS
Timeline
Start Date: 2004-08-13
Current End Date: 2009-04-30
Potential End Date: 2009-04-30 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2013-04-01
More Contracts from Leidos, Inc.
- Science Operation and Maintenance Support for the United States Antarctic Program — $3.1B (National Science Foundation)
- Provide Funding for Clin 302 for Pre-Flight and In-Flight Services. Contract Number Dtfawa-05-C-00031, Lockheed Martin. POP 01/16/08-03/31/08 — $1.9B (Department of Transportation)
- THE Facilities Development and Operations Contract(fdoc) Specifies Technical, Managerial, and Adminstrative Work Needed to Ensure the Availablitity, Integrity, and Reliability of Missionoperations Facilites Supporting National Aeronautics and Space Administration (nasa) Human Space Flight (HSF) Programs Requiring Mission Operations Support. the Objective of This Contract IS to Consolidate Efforts Across the Facilities Covered Under Fodoc in Order to Maximize Synergy for Hardware and Software Development, Modification, Sustaining. Maintenance, Reconfiguration, and Operations for the Purpose of Reducing Cost Without Compromising Facility Functionality and Performance. Nasa Will Collaborate With the Contractor on Developing Procedural and Technical Innovations That Improve Quality, Ensure Customer Satisfaction and Reduce Cost. Mission Operations Facilities Currently Support the Space Shuttle Programand the International Space Station Progra, Including International Partner and Commmercial Visiting Vehicles. Mission Operations Facilities Supporting the Cnstellation Program(cxp) ARE Continuously Under Development in Concert With CXP Formulation and Implementation. Fdoc Applies to the Facilities of These Three Programs, and ANY Other HSF Program Requiring Mission Operations Facility Support. in Addition, Future Mission Operations Facilities and Capabilities ARE Within the Technical Scope of This SOW, and Fdoc Worlk Associated With These Facilities Will BE Enabled Through Idiq — $1.3B (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- National Airspace System (NAS) Implementation Support Contract (nisc). Provides Engineering and Technical Support Services to FAA Organizations Responsible for NAS Transformation, Integration and Implementation in the Areas of Implementation and Integration Planning, Transition Planning, Engineering Support, Environmental Support, Automation Support and Other Engineering and Technical Disciplines AS Required. TAS::69 8107::TAS — $1.1B (Department of Transportation)
- Itssc Task Order for Systems — $1.1B (Social Security Administration)
Other General Services Administration Contracts
- Software Life Cycle Development — $1.4B (Science Applications International Corporation)
- Task Order (TO) 47qfca21f0018 IS Hereby Awarded to Booz Allen Hamilton, Inc. (BAH) to Provide Enterprise Level Data to the Ousd(c), and ITS Strategic Partners (I.E., DOD Fourth Estate, DOD Departments, and IC Community) — $1.4B (Booz Allen Hamilton Inc)
- Federal Contract — $1.2B (Booz Allen Hamilton Inc)
- THE Scope of the to IS to Provide Enterprise IT Services for the Usace — $1.1B (Science Applications International Corporation)
- Task Order Award — $1.1B (Booz Allen Hamilton Inc)