GSA Awards $18.36M for Programming Services to Leidos, Inc. Over 3 Years

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $18,359,921 ($18.4M)

Contractor: Leidos, Inc.

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2005-08-01

End Date: 2008-07-31

Contract Duration: 1,095 days

Daily Burn Rate: $16.8K/day

Number of Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS

Sector: IT

Official Description: PROGRAMMING SERVICES

Place of Performance

Location: ATLANTA, FULTON County, GEORGIA, 30301, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

State: Georgia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $18.4 million to LEIDOS, INC. for work described as: PROGRAMMING SERVICES Key points: 1. Leidos, Inc. secured a significant contract for programming services. 2. The contract value is substantial at $18.36 million. 3. The duration of the contract was 3 years. 4. The contract type was Time and Materials, which can pose cost risks. 5. The agency involved is the General Services Administration (GSA).

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The Time and Materials contract type for programming services can lead to cost overruns if not closely managed. Without specific benchmarks for similar programming services contracts, it's difficult to definitively assess pricing, but the total value suggests a significant investment.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: unknown

The competition method is not specified, but Time and Materials contracts can sometimes be less competitive if not structured with clear performance metrics and price ceilings. This could impact price discovery and potentially lead to higher costs.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayer funds are being utilized for these programming services. The effectiveness of the spending depends on the successful delivery of services and the value obtained relative to the cost.

Public Impact

Citizens rely on government IT systems that require programming services for maintenance and development. Efficient use of taxpayer dollars in IT contracts is crucial for public trust. The GSA plays a key role in procuring IT services for various federal agencies.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

Programming services are a critical component of federal IT infrastructure, supporting everything from legacy systems to new digital initiatives. Spending benchmarks vary widely based on complexity and duration, but $18.36M over three years for a single contract is a notable investment.

Small Business Impact

The provided data does not indicate whether small businesses were involved as subcontractors or prime contractors. Further analysis would be needed to determine the extent of small business participation.

Oversight & Accountability

The General Services Administration (GSA) is responsible for overseeing this contract. Accountability would involve tracking project milestones, deliverables, and adherence to the Time and Materials contract terms to ensure value for money.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

general-services-administration, ga, do, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $18.4 million to LEIDOS, INC.. PROGRAMMING SERVICES

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is LEIDOS, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Federal Acquisition Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $18.4 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2005-08-01. End: 2008-07-31.

What specific programming services were procured under this contract, and how do they align with GSA's mission objectives?

The contract was for general 'Programming Services.' Without further details, it's challenging to ascertain the specific alignment with GSA's mission. These services could range from software development and maintenance to system integration or data analysis, all of which are vital for modern government operations but require specific project goals for true mission alignment.

What were the key performance indicators (KPIs) and how was performance measured to ensure value and mitigate risks associated with the Time and Materials contract?

The data does not specify the KPIs or performance measurement methods used for this Time and Materials contract. Effective oversight would typically involve tracking hours, deliverables, and adherence to scope. The absence of this information raises concerns about the ability to ensure value and control costs effectively.

How did the GSA ensure fair and reasonable pricing given the Time and Materials contract type and the unspecified competition method?

The provided data does not detail the process used by GSA to ensure fair and reasonable pricing. For Time and Materials contracts, this often involves establishing labor rates, tracking hours diligently, and potentially setting cost ceilings. The lack of clarity on the competition method also makes it difficult to assess the price discovery process.

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Leidos Holdings, Inc. (UEI: 611641312)

Address: 10260 CAMPUS POINT DR, SAN DIEGO, CA, 92121

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $27,640,428

Exercised Options: $18,463,162

Current Obligation: $18,359,921

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: GS09K99BHD0010

IDV Type: GWAC

Timeline

Start Date: 2005-08-01

Current End Date: 2008-07-31

Potential End Date: 2008-07-31 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2015-08-05

More Contracts from Leidos, Inc.

View all Leidos, Inc. federal contracts →

Other General Services Administration Contracts

View all General Services Administration contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending