GSA awards $20.9M for JPAS sustainment support to Peraton Enterprise Solutions LLC

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $20,902,049 ($20.9M)

Contractor: Peraton Enterprise Solutions LLC

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2011-04-01

End Date: 2013-03-31

Contract Duration: 730 days

Daily Burn Rate: $28.6K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: IT

Official Description: JPAS SUSTAINMENT SUPPORT

Place of Performance

Location: SEASIDE, MONTEREY County, CALIFORNIA, 93955

State: California Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $20.9 million to PERATON ENTERPRISE SOLUTIONS LLC for work described as: JPAS SUSTAINMENT SUPPORT Key points: 1. Contract value of $20.9M over two years suggests a significant investment in IT systems. 2. The firm-fixed-price contract type indicates a defined scope and predictable costs. 3. Awarded under full and open competition, this contract likely benefited from competitive pricing. 4. The Computer Systems Design Services NAICS code points to a focus on IT infrastructure and support. 5. A single award for sustainment support may indicate specialized expertise required. 6. The contract duration of 730 days aligns with typical IT sustainment cycles.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $20.9M over two years for JPAS sustainment support appears reasonable given the scope of IT system maintenance. Benchmarking against similar IT sustainment contracts would provide further insight into value for money. The firm-fixed-price structure helps control costs for the government, assuming the scope was well-defined.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, suggesting that multiple vendors had the opportunity to bid. This competitive process is expected to drive better pricing and service quality. The fact that it was competed openly indicates that the government sought the best value from the widest possible pool of qualified contractors.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition generally leads to more favorable pricing for taxpayers by fostering a competitive environment among potential bidders.

Public Impact

The JPAS sustainment support contract benefits the General Services Administration (GSA) by ensuring the continued operation of critical IT systems. This contract delivers essential IT services, likely including maintenance, updates, and technical support for the JPAS system. The geographic impact is primarily federal, supporting agency operations nationwide. Workforce implications include the potential for skilled IT professionals to be engaged in maintaining and supporting this system.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for vendor lock-in if specialized knowledge is developed solely by the contractor.
Reliance on a single vendor for critical sustainment could pose risks if the vendor faces financial or operational challenges.

Positive Signals

Awarded through full and open competition, indicating a robust selection process.
Firm-fixed-price contract type provides cost certainty for the government.
The contract duration of two years allows for stable support and planning.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the IT services sector, specifically focusing on computer systems design and related services. The market for IT sustainment and support is substantial, with government agencies being significant consumers. This contract represents a portion of the broader federal spending on maintaining and operating IT infrastructure, which is crucial for agency functions.

Small Business Impact

The contract was awarded under full and open competition and does not indicate any specific small business set-aside. Therefore, the direct impact on small businesses through this specific award is likely minimal, unless Peraton Enterprise Solutions LLC engages them as subcontractors. Further analysis of subcontracting plans would be needed to assess broader small business ecosystem implications.

Oversight & Accountability

The contract is managed by the General Services Administration (GSA), which has established oversight mechanisms for federal contracts. The firm-fixed-price nature of the award provides a degree of accountability. Transparency is generally maintained through federal procurement databases, and the Inspector General's office would have jurisdiction over any potential fraud or mismanagement.

Related Government Programs

JPAS System
IT Sustainment Services
Computer Systems Design Services
General Services Administration Contracts

Risk Flags

Single vendor reliance
Potential for vendor lock-in

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $20.9 million to PERATON ENTERPRISE SOLUTIONS LLC. JPAS SUSTAINMENT SUPPORT

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is PERATON ENTERPRISE SOLUTIONS LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Federal Acquisition Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $20.9 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2011-04-01. End: 2013-03-31.

What is the historical spending trend for JPAS sustainment support by the GSA?

Historical spending data for JPAS sustainment support by the GSA would provide context for the current $20.9 million award. Analyzing past contract values, durations, and awarded contractors can reveal trends in IT sustainment costs and identify any significant increases or decreases in investment over time. Without specific historical data, it's difficult to definitively state if this award represents a continuation of previous spending levels, an increase, or a decrease. However, the two-year duration and firm-fixed-price nature suggest a planned and budgeted expenditure for a defined period of IT system maintenance and support.

How does the per-unit cost of this JPAS sustainment support compare to similar government contracts?

Benchmarking the per-unit cost of this JPAS sustainment support contract against similar government IT sustainment contracts is crucial for assessing value for money. 'Per-unit cost' could be analyzed in various ways, such as cost per system supported, cost per user, or cost per hour of support, depending on the contract's specific deliverables. If comparable contracts for similar systems (e.g., other personnel security or identity management systems) show significantly lower costs for equivalent services, it might indicate that this contract is priced higher than the market average. Conversely, if the complexity or scope of JPAS is greater than comparable systems, a higher cost might be justified. A detailed analysis would require access to specific performance metrics and pricing structures of other relevant contracts.

What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) used to measure the success of this JPAS sustainment support contract?

The success of the JPAS sustainment support contract is typically measured through Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) outlined in the contract's Performance Work Statement (PWS). These KPIs often include metrics related to system availability (uptime), response times for issue resolution, patch and update deployment timeliness, security compliance adherence, and user satisfaction. For instance, a KPI might be '99.9% system uptime' or 'resolution of critical issues within 4 hours.' The government monitors these KPIs to ensure the contractor is meeting its obligations and providing the required level of service. Failure to meet KPIs can result in penalties or impact future contract awards.

What is Peraton Enterprise Solutions LLC's track record with GSA and similar IT sustainment contracts?

Peraton Enterprise Solutions LLC's track record with the GSA and in providing similar IT sustainment services is a critical factor in assessing contract performance risk. Reviewing their past performance evaluations, contract history, and any reported issues or successes on previous government contracts provides insight into their reliability and capability. A history of successful contract completion, positive performance reviews, and minimal disputes would indicate a lower risk. Conversely, a record of performance deficiencies, contract disputes, or significant cost overruns on similar projects would raise concerns about their ability to effectively deliver on this JPAS sustainment support contract. Information on past performance is often available through government databases like the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS).

What are the potential risks associated with relying on a single vendor for JPAS sustainment support?

Relying on a single vendor, such as Peraton Enterprise Solutions LLC, for JPAS sustainment support introduces several potential risks. These include vendor lock-in, where the government becomes heavily dependent on the contractor's proprietary knowledge and technology, making it difficult and costly to switch providers. There's also the risk of reduced competition in future procurements if the incumbent develops unique expertise. Furthermore, the government's negotiating power may be diminished if there are limited alternative providers. Operational risks include potential disruptions if the vendor experiences financial instability, workforce issues, or strategic shifts. Mitigating these risks often involves robust contract management, clear performance standards, and contingency planning.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Computer Systems Design and Related Services › Computer Systems Design Services

Product/Service Code: IT AND TELECOM - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS › ADP AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: R3114433

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: HP, Inc.

Address: 13600 EDS DR, HERNDON, VA, 20171

Business Categories: Category Business, Limited Liability Corporation, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $20,982,363

Exercised Options: $20,902,049

Current Obligation: $20,902,049

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: GS00Q09BGD0027

IDV Type: GWAC

Timeline