GSA's $19.1M Pharmacy Re-engineering Contract with Peraton Faces Scrutiny for Value and Competition

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $19,138,489 ($19.1M)

Contractor: Peraton Enterprise Solutions LLC

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2009-10-13

End Date: 2015-02-03

Contract Duration: 1,939 days

Daily Burn Rate: $9.9K/day

Competition Type: COMPETITIVE DELIVERY ORDER

Number of Offers Received: 4

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS

Sector: IT

Official Description: PHARMACY RE-ENGINEERING

Place of Performance

Location: WASHINGTON, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA County, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 20420

State: District of Columbia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $19.1 million to PERATON ENTERPRISE SOLUTIONS LLC for work described as: PHARMACY RE-ENGINEERING Key points: 1. The contract awarded to Peraton Enterprise Solutions LLC for Pharmacy Re-engineering totaled $19.1 million. 2. Competition was competitive, but the Time and Materials pricing model raises questions about cost control. 3. Potential risks include cost overruns due to the T&M structure and lack of clear performance metrics. 4. The sector is IT services, specifically Computing Infrastructure Providers, Data Processing, and Web Hosting.

Value Assessment

Rating: questionable

The $19.1 million total award for Pharmacy Re-engineering is difficult to assess without specific performance data. The Time and Materials pricing structure, common in IT services, can lead to higher costs compared to fixed-price contracts if not managed tightly.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: unknown

This was a competitive delivery order, indicating multiple bids were considered. However, the Time and Materials (T&M) contract type may limit price discovery and incentivize increased effort rather than efficiency.

Taxpayer Impact: The T&M pricing structure could lead to higher taxpayer costs if not rigorously monitored for necessity and efficiency.

Public Impact

Impacts federal pharmacy operations and potentially patient access to medications. The use of IT infrastructure services for pharmacy re-engineering suggests modernization efforts. Questions about cost-effectiveness may affect future IT service procurements in healthcare-related sectors.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the IT services sector, specifically focusing on computing infrastructure and data processing. Benchmarks for similar IT service contracts vary widely based on scope and complexity, but $19.1 million over nearly 2 years suggests a significant undertaking.

Small Business Impact

The data does not indicate if small businesses were involved as subcontractors or prime contractors. Further analysis would be needed to determine the extent of small business participation.

Oversight & Accountability

The General Services Administration (GSA) managed this contract through its Federal Acquisition Service. Oversight would typically involve monitoring contract performance, expenditures, and adherence to terms, especially crucial with T&M contracts.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

computing-infrastructure-providers-data-, general-services-administration, dc, delivery-order, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $19.1 million to PERATON ENTERPRISE SOLUTIONS LLC. PHARMACY RE-ENGINEERING

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is PERATON ENTERPRISE SOLUTIONS LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Federal Acquisition Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $19.1 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2009-10-13. End: 2015-02-03.

What specific pharmacy re-engineering outcomes were achieved with the $19.1 million investment, and how do they compare to pre-contract performance metrics?

The provided data lacks specific performance metrics or outcome details for the Pharmacy Re-engineering project. A thorough review would require access to contract performance reports, deliverables, and any post-award assessments to determine if the $19.1 million investment yielded measurable improvements in efficiency, cost savings, or service quality compared to the baseline.

How effectively did the Time and Materials pricing model control costs and incentivize efficient service delivery for this IT infrastructure contract?

The Time and Materials (T&M) pricing model inherently carries a risk of cost escalation if not managed with stringent oversight. While it allows flexibility, it can incentivize longer task durations rather than efficient completion. Without detailed performance and cost-tracking data, it's difficult to definitively assess the cost control effectiveness and incentive alignment for this specific contract.

What was the competitive landscape for this delivery order, and did the chosen procurement method ensure the best value for taxpayers?

The contract was awarded via a 'Competitive Delivery Order,' suggesting multiple vendors were considered. However, the effectiveness of this competition in securing the 'best value' is contingent on the specific evaluation criteria used and the rigor of the price analysis. The T&M structure itself can sometimes complicate direct value comparisons between bids.

Industry Classification

NAICS: InformationComputing Infrastructure Providers, Data Processing, Web Hosting, and Related ServicesComputing Infrastructure Providers, Data Processing, Web Hosting, and Related Services

Product/Service Code: IT AND TELECOM - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND TELECOMMUNICATIONSADP AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: COMPETITIVE DELIVERY ORDER

Solicitation Procedures: SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION

Solicitation ID: R3094039A

Offers Received: 4

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS (Y)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: HP, Inc. (UEI: 009122532)

Address: 136000 EDS DR MAIL STOP A3S B53, HERNDON, VA, 20171

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $22,783,024

Exercised Options: $19,138,489

Current Obligation: $19,138,489

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: GS35F0323J

IDV Type: FSS

Timeline

Start Date: 2009-10-13

Current End Date: 2015-02-03

Potential End Date: 2015-02-03 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2016-04-29

More Contracts from Peraton Enterprise Solutions LLC

View all Peraton Enterprise Solutions LLC federal contracts →

Other General Services Administration Contracts

View all General Services Administration contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending