NGA's $23.9M Geospatial Intelligence Training System contract awarded to Leidos, Inc
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $23,922,498 ($23.9M)
Contractor: Leidos, Inc.
Awarding Agency: General Services Administration
Start Date: 2006-05-01
End Date: 2009-10-31
Contract Duration: 1,279 days
Daily Burn Rate: $18.7K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 3
Pricing Type: COST PLUS AWARD FEE
Sector: IT
Official Description: THE NATIONAL GEOSPATIAL-INTELLIGENCE AGENCY (NGA), NATIONAL GEOSPATIAL-INTELLIGENCE COLLEGE (NGC) IS RESPONSIBLE FOR GEOSPATIAL INTELLIGENCE TRAINING FOR DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE AND INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY (IC) EMPLOYEES. THE TRAINING SYSTEM PROVIDES A COMPREHENSIVE CAPABILITY FOR GEOSPATIAL INTELLIGENCE TRADECRAFT AND APPLICATIONS TRAINING, AND AN IN-OFFICE PRODUCTION AND OFFICE AUTOMATION ENVIRONMENT FOR INSTRUCTORS AND COURSEWARE DEVELOPERS. IT MEETS REQUIREMENTS TO CREATE, PRESENT, AND MANAGE GEOSPATIAL INTELLIGENCE TRAINING IN A DIGITAL ENVIRONMENT. INSTRUCTORS AND COURSE DEVELOPERS USE THE SYSTEM TO CREATE, MODIFY, AND DISPLAY COURSE MATERIAL. IT ALSO SUPPORTS THE INSTRUCTORS CAPABILITY TO MANIPULATE, MODIFY, AND DISPLAY SOFTCOPY GEOSPATIAL INTELLIGENCE PRODUCTS AND IMAGERY FOR COURSE DEVELOPMENT OR PRESENTATION ON THEIR DESKTOP OR CLASSROOM WORKSTATIONS
Place of Performance
Location: FORT BELVOIR, FAIRFAX County, VIRGINIA, 22060, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
State: Virginia Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
General Services Administration obligated $23.9 million to LEIDOS, INC. for work described as: THE NATIONAL GEOSPATIAL-INTELLIGENCE AGENCY (NGA), NATIONAL GEOSPATIAL-INTELLIGENCE COLLEGE (NGC) IS RESPONSIBLE FOR GEOSPATIAL INTELLIGENCE TRAINING FOR DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE AND INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY (IC) EMPLOYEES. THE TRAINING SYSTEM PROVIDES A COMPREHENSIVE CAPABILITY FOR G… Key points: 1. The National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency (NGA) relies on this system for critical geospatial intelligence training. 2. Leidos, Inc. is the sole contractor for this system, raising questions about competition. 3. The contract's duration and cost-plus award fee structure warrant scrutiny for potential cost overruns. 4. This IT system supports training for DoD and IC employees, highlighting its strategic importance.
Value Assessment
Rating: questionable
The contract is a Cost Plus Award Fee (CPAF) type, which can incentivize contractor performance but also carries a risk of cost escalation if not managed tightly. Benchmarking the per-unit cost is difficult without more granular data on system components and user licenses.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. However, the data indicates Leidos, Inc. is the sole awardee, which may limit ongoing price discovery and innovation if follow-on contracts are not re-competed.
Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayer funds are being used for a critical training system. While competition was initially present, the long-term sole-source nature of the award could impact overall value for money.
Public Impact
Ensures critical geospatial intelligence skills for Department of Defense and Intelligence Community personnel. Supports the creation and delivery of digital training materials, modernizing educational capabilities. Facilitates the manipulation and display of sensitive geospatial intelligence products for training purposes.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Cost Plus Award Fee structure
- Sole awardee for a critical system
- Long contract duration
Positive Signals
- Full and open competition initially
- Supports critical national security training needs
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the Computer Systems Design Services sector, which is crucial for supporting government IT infrastructure and specialized training needs. Spending benchmarks in this sector vary widely based on complexity and scope.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates this contract was not awarded to small businesses (sb: false). There is no information provided on subcontracting opportunities for small businesses within this award.
Oversight & Accountability
The General Services Administration (GSA) acted as the contracting agency, suggesting adherence to federal procurement regulations. However, the long duration and sole awardee status warrant ongoing oversight to ensure performance and cost control.
Related Government Programs
- Computer Systems Design Services
- General Services Administration Contracting
- Federal Acquisition Service Programs
Risk Flags
- Potential for cost overruns due to CPAF structure.
- Risk of vendor lock-in with a sole awardee.
- Lack of transparency on performance metrics for award fee.
- No indication of small business participation.
Tags
computer-systems-design-services, general-services-administration, va, do, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
General Services Administration awarded $23.9 million to LEIDOS, INC.. THE NATIONAL GEOSPATIAL-INTELLIGENCE AGENCY (NGA), NATIONAL GEOSPATIAL-INTELLIGENCE COLLEGE (NGC) IS RESPONSIBLE FOR GEOSPATIAL INTELLIGENCE TRAINING FOR DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE AND INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY (IC) EMPLOYEES. THE TRAINING SYSTEM PROVIDES A COMPREHENSIVE CAPABILITY FOR GEOSPATIAL INTELLIGENCE TRADECRAFT AND APPLICATIONS TRAINING, AND AN IN-OFFICE PRODUCTION AND OFFICE AUTOMATION ENVIRONMENT FOR INSTRUCTORS AND COURSEWARE DEVELOPERS. IT MEETS REQUIREMENTS TO CREATE, PRESENT, AND MANAGE G
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is LEIDOS, INC..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Federal Acquisition Service).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $23.9 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2006-05-01. End: 2009-10-31.
What is the specific performance metric tied to the 'Award Fee' in this Cost Plus Award Fee contract, and how has Leidos performed against these metrics?
The specific performance metrics for the Award Fee are not detailed in the provided data. Typically, CPAF contracts link award fees to achieving specific performance targets related to cost, schedule, and technical performance. Without access to the contract's Performance Work Statement (PWS) and award fee determination documentation, it's impossible to assess how Leidos has performed or the actual fee earned.
Given Leidos is the sole awardee, what mechanisms are in place to ensure continued cost competitiveness and prevent vendor lock-in for future iterations of this training system?
While the initial award was full and open, the sole awardee status raises concerns. Agencies typically mitigate this through robust market research for future procurements, clearly defined contract exit strategies, and potentially breaking down future requirements into smaller, more competitive lots. The government should actively plan for re-competition or explore alternative solutions to maintain competitive pressure.
How does the effectiveness of the geospatial intelligence training delivered through this system compare to previous methods or industry standards, and what is the ROI?
The provided data focuses on the contract award details and system description, not its operational effectiveness or return on investment (ROI). Assessing training effectiveness would require analyzing student performance metrics, instructor feedback, and the system's impact on mission readiness. Without this data, a definitive statement on ROI or comparative effectiveness is not possible.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Computer Systems Design and Related Services › Computer Systems Design Services
Product/Service Code: IT AND TELECOM - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS › ADP AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY
Offers Received: 3
Pricing Type: COST PLUS AWARD FEE (R)
Contractor Details
Parent Company: Leidos Holdings, Inc. (UEI: 611641312)
Address: 1710 SAIC DR, MCLEAN, VA, 22102
Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $28,433,705
Exercised Options: $23,922,498
Current Obligation: $23,922,498
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: GS00T99ALD0210
IDV Type: GWAC
Timeline
Start Date: 2006-05-01
Current End Date: 2009-10-31
Potential End Date: 2009-10-31 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2015-07-10
More Contracts from Leidos, Inc.
- Science Operation and Maintenance Support for the United States Antarctic Program — $3.1B (National Science Foundation)
- Provide Funding for Clin 302 for Pre-Flight and In-Flight Services. Contract Number Dtfawa-05-C-00031, Lockheed Martin. POP 01/16/08-03/31/08 — $1.9B (Department of Transportation)
- THE Facilities Development and Operations Contract(fdoc) Specifies Technical, Managerial, and Adminstrative Work Needed to Ensure the Availablitity, Integrity, and Reliability of Missionoperations Facilites Supporting National Aeronautics and Space Administration (nasa) Human Space Flight (HSF) Programs Requiring Mission Operations Support. the Objective of This Contract IS to Consolidate Efforts Across the Facilities Covered Under Fodoc in Order to Maximize Synergy for Hardware and Software Development, Modification, Sustaining. Maintenance, Reconfiguration, and Operations for the Purpose of Reducing Cost Without Compromising Facility Functionality and Performance. Nasa Will Collaborate With the Contractor on Developing Procedural and Technical Innovations That Improve Quality, Ensure Customer Satisfaction and Reduce Cost. Mission Operations Facilities Currently Support the Space Shuttle Programand the International Space Station Progra, Including International Partner and Commmercial Visiting Vehicles. Mission Operations Facilities Supporting the Cnstellation Program(cxp) ARE Continuously Under Development in Concert With CXP Formulation and Implementation. Fdoc Applies to the Facilities of These Three Programs, and ANY Other HSF Program Requiring Mission Operations Facility Support. in Addition, Future Mission Operations Facilities and Capabilities ARE Within the Technical Scope of This SOW, and Fdoc Worlk Associated With These Facilities Will BE Enabled Through Idiq — $1.3B (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- National Airspace System (NAS) Implementation Support Contract (nisc). Provides Engineering and Technical Support Services to FAA Organizations Responsible for NAS Transformation, Integration and Implementation in the Areas of Implementation and Integration Planning, Transition Planning, Engineering Support, Environmental Support, Automation Support and Other Engineering and Technical Disciplines AS Required. TAS::69 8107::TAS — $1.1B (Department of Transportation)
- Itssc Task Order for Systems — $1.1B (Social Security Administration)
Other General Services Administration Contracts
- Software Life Cycle Development — $1.4B (Science Applications International Corporation)
- Task Order (TO) 47qfca21f0018 IS Hereby Awarded to Booz Allen Hamilton, Inc. (BAH) to Provide Enterprise Level Data to the Ousd(c), and ITS Strategic Partners (I.E., DOD Fourth Estate, DOD Departments, and IC Community) — $1.4B (Booz Allen Hamilton Inc)
- Federal Contract — $1.2B (Booz Allen Hamilton Inc)
- THE Scope of the to IS to Provide Enterprise IT Services for the Usace — $1.1B (Science Applications International Corporation)
- Task Order Award — $1.1B (Booz Allen Hamilton Inc)