GSA awards $24.4M for Business Improvement & IT Support to RGS Associates, Inc

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $24,432,492 ($24.4M)

Contractor: RGS Associates, Inc.

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2005-02-28

End Date: 2010-02-28

Contract Duration: 1,826 days

Daily Burn Rate: $13.4K/day

Number of Offers Received: 7

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS

Sector: IT

Official Description: NON-PERSONAL BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT AND IT RELATED SUPPORT SERVICES

Place of Performance

Location: ARLINGTON, ARLINGTON County, VIRGINIA, 22202, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

State: Virginia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $24.4 million to RGS ASSOCIATES, INC. for work described as: NON-PERSONAL BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT AND IT RELATED SUPPORT SERVICES Key points: 1. Contract value of $24.4M over 5 years for consulting services. 2. Competition details are limited, raising potential concerns about price discovery. 3. Risk is moderate due to the long duration and time-and-materials pricing. 4. Sector is primarily IT and administrative management consulting.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract's time and materials pricing structure, coupled with a significant value, suggests a need for robust oversight to ensure fair pricing. Benchmarking against similar administrative and IT consulting contracts would be beneficial.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: unknown

The competition method is not specified, but the lack of detail suggests it may not have been full and open. This could limit price discovery and potentially lead to higher costs for the government.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayer funds are being utilized for consulting services. Without clear competition, there's a risk of overpayment, impacting the efficient use of public money.

Public Impact

Citizens rely on efficient government operations, which these services aim to support. Transparency in contracting ensures public trust and accountability for taxpayer dollars. Effective IT and business improvement services can lead to better public service delivery.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of competition details
Time and materials pricing
Long contract duration

Positive Signals

Services support business improvement and IT
Contract awarded by GSA

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the administrative management and general management consulting services sector, often involving IT support. Spending in this area is common across federal agencies for operational efficiency.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates this contract was not awarded to small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). Further analysis would be needed to determine if small business participation was sought or achieved through subcontracting.

Oversight & Accountability

The General Services Administration (GSA) is responsible for this contract. Oversight would involve monitoring performance, costs, and adherence to contract terms, especially given the time and materials nature.

Related Government Programs

Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services
General Services Administration Contracting
Federal Acquisition Service Programs

Risk Flags

Potential for cost overruns due to time and materials pricing.
Lack of transparency in the procurement process.
Limited visibility into contractor performance metrics.
No small business participation indicated.
Long contract duration increases long-term cost exposure.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $24.4 million to RGS ASSOCIATES, INC.. NON-PERSONAL BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT AND IT RELATED SUPPORT SERVICES

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is RGS ASSOCIATES, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Federal Acquisition Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $24.4 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2005-02-28. End: 2010-02-28.

What was the specific justification for the chosen procurement method, and how was price reasonableness determined?

The provided data does not specify the procurement method or the justification. Understanding the competition details is crucial for assessing price reasonableness. Without this information, it's difficult to ascertain if the government secured the best value, as the lack of transparency could mask potential inefficiencies or inflated costs.

What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) for these services, and how is contractor performance being measured?

The data does not include specific KPIs or performance metrics. Effective oversight requires clearly defined deliverables and measurable outcomes. Without this, it's challenging to assess the true value and effectiveness of the services provided by RGS Associates, Inc. and ensure taxpayer funds are yielding desired results.

How does the cost of these services compare to industry benchmarks for similar IT and business improvement consulting?

A direct comparison is difficult without detailed service descriptions and specific deliverables. However, the $24.4M value over five years, combined with a time-and-materials structure, warrants a thorough benchmark analysis against comparable federal and commercial contracts to ensure cost-effectiveness and identify potential areas for savings.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services › Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › MANAGEMENT SUPPORT SERVICES

Contractor Details

Address: 2121 CRYSTAL DR STE 709, ARLINGTON, VA, 22202

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $24,432,516

Exercised Options: $24,432,492

Current Obligation: $24,432,492

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: GS10F0285L

IDV Type: FSS

Timeline