GSA Awards $694M Geospatial Data Contract to Leidos, Inc. Under Full and Open Competition

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $694,330,085 ($694.3M)

Contractor: Leidos, Inc.

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2016-09-06

End Date: 2021-11-05

Contract Duration: 1,886 days

Daily Burn Rate: $368.1K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE

Sector: Engineering Services

Official Description: IGF::OT::IGF HIGH RESOLUTION 3D GEOSPATIAL INFORMATION

Place of Performance

Location: RESTON, FAIRFAX County, VIRGINIA, 20190

State: Virginia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $694.3 million to LEIDOS, INC. for work described as: IGF::OT::IGF HIGH RESOLUTION 3D GEOSPATIAL INFORMATION Key points: 1. Significant contract value of $694.3M for high-resolution 3D geospatial information. 2. Leidos, Inc. secured the contract through full and open competition. 3. The contract spans nearly two years, indicating ongoing need for these services. 4. The sector is Engineering Services, crucial for various government planning and operations.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract's Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) pricing structure allows for flexibility but requires careful monitoring of costs to ensure value. Benchmarking against similar large-scale geospatial data contracts would provide further insight into its cost-effectiveness.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The use of full and open competition is a positive indicator for price discovery and potentially achieving competitive pricing. This method allows all eligible vendors to bid, fostering a market-driven approach to setting the contract's price.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition generally benefits taxpayers by promoting competitive pricing and ensuring the government receives the best value for its investment.

Public Impact

Provides critical 3D geospatial data for government planning, infrastructure, and national security. Supports agencies reliant on accurate spatial information for decision-making. Enhances understanding of physical environments for diverse applications.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

  • CPFF pricing can lead to cost overruns if not managed strictly.
  • Potential for scope creep in complex geospatial projects.
  • Dependence on a single contractor for a critical data type.

Positive Signals

  • Awarded through full and open competition.
  • Significant contract value suggests a high demand and recognized need.
  • Long contract duration indicates sustained government requirement.

Sector Analysis

Engineering Services (NAICS 541330) encompass a broad range of technical expertise. Geospatial information services are vital for defense, urban planning, environmental management, and disaster response, with contract values varying widely based on scope and technology.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates this contract was not set aside for small businesses and was awarded to a large corporation, Leidos, Inc. There is no direct indication of small business participation within this specific award data.

Oversight & Accountability

The General Services Administration (GSA) manages this contract through its Federal Acquisition Service. Oversight would focus on ensuring Leidos meets performance requirements and adheres to the CPFF terms, with regular reporting and potential audits.

Related Government Programs

  • Engineering Services
  • General Services Administration Contracting
  • Federal Acquisition Service Programs

Risk Flags

  • Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) pricing model carries inherent cost risk for the government.
  • Potential for contractor to maximize profit by increasing costs, requiring diligent oversight.
  • Complexity of 3D geospatial data may lead to unforeseen technical challenges.
  • Long contract duration increases exposure to evolving technology and requirements.
  • Lack of small business participation noted in award data.

Tags

engineering-services, general-services-administration, va, delivery-order, 100m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $694.3 million to LEIDOS, INC.. IGF::OT::IGF HIGH RESOLUTION 3D GEOSPATIAL INFORMATION

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is LEIDOS, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Federal Acquisition Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $694.3 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2016-09-06. End: 2021-11-05.

What is the specific breakdown of costs within the Cost Plus Fixed Fee structure, and how are indirect costs managed?

The Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) structure involves reimbursing the contractor for allowable costs plus a fixed fee representing profit. Effective oversight requires detailed review of incurred costs, including direct labor, materials, and overhead, ensuring they align with the contract's scope and are reasonable and allocable. The fixed fee is negotiated upfront and should not change, providing a predictable profit margin for the contractor while the government bears the cost risk.

How does the government ensure the quality and accuracy of the high-resolution 3D geospatial data delivered under this contract?

Quality assurance for geospatial data typically involves establishing clear technical specifications and performance standards in the contract. This includes defining accuracy metrics, resolution requirements, and data formats. The government would likely implement a quality assurance surveillance plan (QASP) to monitor deliverables, conduct independent verification and validation, and require regular progress reports detailing data quality checks performed by the contractor.

What mechanisms are in place to manage potential scope creep and ensure the project stays within budget and timeline?

Managing scope creep involves a robust change control process. Any proposed changes to the original scope must be formally evaluated for their impact on cost, schedule, and technical requirements. The contracting officer must approve all changes through contract modifications. Regular progress reviews, clear communication channels, and adherence to the defined Statement of Work (SOW) are crucial to prevent unauthorized expansion of the project's scope.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical ServicesArchitectural, Engineering, and Related ServicesEngineering Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT)PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: ID01160073

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE (U)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 1750 PRESIDENTS ST FL 4, RESTON, VA, 20190

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $787,585,559

Exercised Options: $707,864,033

Current Obligation: $694,330,085

Actual Outlays: $-163,200

Subaward Activity

Number of Subawards: 98

Total Subaward Amount: $38,039,679

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: GS00Q14OADU122

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2016-09-06

Current End Date: 2021-11-05

Potential End Date: 2021-11-05 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2025-09-23

More Contracts from Leidos, Inc.

View all Leidos, Inc. federal contracts →

Other General Services Administration Contracts

View all General Services Administration contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending