GSA Awards $20.2M Design/Build Contract for Border Infrastructure to Leidos, Inc

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $20,223,668 ($20.2M)

Contractor: Leidos, Inc.

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2012-05-09

End Date: 2014-04-21

Contract Duration: 712 days

Daily Burn Rate: $28.4K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Construction

Official Description: IGF::OT::IGF .AWARD OF A DESIGN/BUILD CONTRACT FOR THE SOUTHWEST OUTBOUND TIER 3 (OT3) AND PORT HARDENING ELEMENTS. THIS REQUIREMENT IS FOR OT3 AND PH WORK OVER 32 PORTS ALONG THE SOUTHERN BORDER AND FOUR STATES.

Place of Performance

Location: SAN DIEGO, SAN DIEGO County, CALIFORNIA, 92121

State: California Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $20.2 million to LEIDOS, INC. for work described as: IGF::OT::IGF .AWARD OF A DESIGN/BUILD CONTRACT FOR THE SOUTHWEST OUTBOUND TIER 3 (OT3) AND PORT HARDENING ELEMENTS. THIS REQUIREMENT IS FOR OT3 AND PH WORK OVER 32 PORTS ALONG THE SOUTHERN BORDER AND FOUR STATES. Key points: 1. Contract awarded to Leidos, Inc. for critical border infrastructure. 2. Significant investment in port hardening and outbound tier facilities. 3. Full and open competition was utilized for this award. 4. Project spans multiple states along the Southern Border.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The award of $20.2 million for a design/build contract appears reasonable given the scope of work involving infrastructure upgrades across 32 ports and four states. Benchmarking against similar large-scale construction projects would provide further context on pricing efficiency.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a robust process for soliciting bids and ensuring competitive pricing. This method generally leads to better price discovery and value for taxpayer dollars.

Taxpayer Impact: The use of full and open competition is a positive indicator for taxpayer value, as it aims to secure the most competitive pricing for the services rendered.

Public Impact

Enhances border security infrastructure, potentially improving efficiency and capacity. Supports federal efforts to manage and process traffic at key ports of entry. Investments in construction projects create jobs and stimulate local economies.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

  • Potential for cost overruns in large-scale construction projects.
  • Complexity of managing a multi-state, multi-port project.
  • Dependence on a single contractor for design and build phases.

Positive Signals

  • Awarded through full and open competition.
  • Addresses critical national infrastructure needs.
  • Clear definition of scope for design and build.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Commercial and Institutional Building Construction sector. Spending in this sector is often driven by government infrastructure needs, security upgrades, and facility modernization. Benchmarks for similar large-scale construction projects can vary widely based on complexity and location.

Small Business Impact

The contract was awarded to Leidos, Inc. and the data indicates that small business participation (sb) was false. Further analysis would be needed to determine if subcontracting opportunities were made available to small businesses.

Oversight & Accountability

The General Services Administration (GSA) awarded this contract through its Public Buildings Service. Oversight would typically involve monitoring project progress, adherence to design specifications, and financial management to ensure accountability and successful project completion.

Related Government Programs

  • Commercial and Institutional Building Construction
  • General Services Administration Contracting
  • Public Buildings Service Programs

Risk Flags

  • Potential for scope creep impacting budget and schedule.
  • Complexity of coordinating work across multiple geographic locations.
  • Reliance on a single prime contractor for critical infrastructure development.
  • Ensuring adequate security protocols during construction phases.

Tags

commercial-and-institutional-building-co, general-services-administration, ca, do, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $20.2 million to LEIDOS, INC.. IGF::OT::IGF .AWARD OF A DESIGN/BUILD CONTRACT FOR THE SOUTHWEST OUTBOUND TIER 3 (OT3) AND PORT HARDENING ELEMENTS. THIS REQUIREMENT IS FOR OT3 AND PH WORK OVER 32 PORTS ALONG THE SOUTHERN BORDER AND FOUR STATES.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is LEIDOS, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Public Buildings Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $20.2 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2012-05-09. End: 2014-04-21.

What specific performance metrics will be used to evaluate the success of the design/build phases and ensure the infrastructure meets operational requirements?

Performance metrics would likely include adherence to the approved design specifications, timely completion of construction milestones, quality of materials and workmanship, and successful integration of new infrastructure with existing systems. The contract's terms should clearly outline these metrics and the process for verification and acceptance by the government.

How will potential cost overruns be managed and mitigated, given the inherent risks in large-scale construction projects?

Mitigation strategies for cost overruns typically involve robust contract management, including detailed cost tracking, change order controls, and contingency planning. The firm fixed-price nature of the contract provides some cost certainty, but unforeseen issues could still arise, requiring careful negotiation and oversight by the GSA.

What is the long-term operational and maintenance plan for the completed infrastructure, and how will its effectiveness be measured post-construction?

The long-term plan would involve operational readiness assessments, ongoing maintenance schedules, and performance monitoring. Effectiveness would be measured by factors such as increased throughput, reduced processing times, enhanced security capabilities, and overall system reliability. The government agency responsible for operating the ports would likely establish these post-construction evaluation criteria.

Industry Classification

NAICS: ConstructionNonresidential Building ConstructionCommercial and Institutional Building Construction

Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, ALTER REAL PROPERTYMAINT, ALTER, REPAIR NONBUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Leidos Holdings, Inc. (UEI: 611641312)

Address: 11951 FREEDOM DR, RESTON, VA, 11

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $20,223,668

Exercised Options: $20,223,668

Current Obligation: $20,223,668

Contract Characteristics

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: GS07P09HHD0107

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2012-05-09

Current End Date: 2014-04-21

Potential End Date: 2014-04-21 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2014-07-14

More Contracts from Leidos, Inc.

View all Leidos, Inc. federal contracts →

Other General Services Administration Contracts

View all General Services Administration contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending