GSA's Trade Center Management Contract Exceeds $257M, Extended Through 2020

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $257,871,670 ($257.9M)

Contractor: Trade Center Management Associates L.L.C.

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2008-11-19

End Date: 2020-12-31

Contract Duration: 4,425 days

Daily Burn Rate: $58.3K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIXED PRICE INCENTIVE

Sector: Other

Official Description: TRADE CENTER MANAGER SERVICES 06/05/2013 NOTICE!!!! THE ORGINAL CONTRACT WAS APPROVED BY THIS CONTRACTING OFFICE ON THIS DATE: LAST MODIFIED DATE: 12/03/2008 11:05:19 LAST MODIFIED USER: 11.CARL.CAMPBELL.GSA.GOV THE CONTRACT WAS CLOSED AND TRANSFERRED TO ANOTHER CONTRACT NUMBER WITH AN IMPROPER NUMBER (GS11P09ZGD0064) AS OF THIS DATE 06/05/2013 THIS CONTRACT IS BEING RE-ACTIVATED BECAUSE OF A CONTRACTURAL AGREEMENT ESTABLISHED BY GSA NCR LEAGLE AND THE CUSTOMER.

Place of Performance

Location: WASHINGTON, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA County, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 20004

State: District of Columbia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $257.9 million to TRADE CENTER MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATES L.L.C. for work described as: TRADE CENTER MANAGER SERVICES 06/05/2013 NOTICE!!!! THE ORGINAL CONTRACT WAS APPROVED BY THIS CONTRACTING OFFICE ON THIS DATE: LAST MODIFIED DATE: 12/03/2008 11:05:19 LAST MODIFIED USER: 11.CARL.CAMPBELL.GSA.GOV THE CONTRACT WAS CLOSED AND TRANSFERRED TO ANOTHER CONTRACT NU… Key points: 1. Contract value is substantial at over $257 million. 2. Competition was full and open, suggesting potential for competitive pricing. 3. Risk appears moderate given the long duration and fixed-price incentive structure. 4. Spending is within the Facilities Support Services sector.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $257.8 million over its lifespan is significant. Benchmarking against similar facilities support services contracts would be necessary to fully assess pricing, but the full and open competition suggests a potentially reasonable price discovery process.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, which generally promotes competitive pricing. The long duration and multiple modifications indicate a potentially complex procurement history.

Taxpayer Impact: The substantial contract value represents a significant allocation of taxpayer funds for essential facilities management services.

Public Impact

Ensures operational continuity for trade centers managed by GSA. Supports federal agency facilities management needs. Long-term contract may indicate stable service provision.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Long contract duration (over 12 years) increases risk of cost overruns or performance degradation.
Multiple modifications suggest potential scope creep or evolving requirements.
Re-activation after closure indicates potential administrative or contractual issues.

Positive Signals

Awarded under full and open competition.
Contractor has a long history with the contract (implied by modification dates).

Sector Analysis

This contract falls under Facilities Support Services, a broad category encompassing building operations and maintenance. Spending in this sector is generally consistent with government needs for infrastructure management.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates the awardee is 'TRADE CENTER MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATES L.L.C.' and that small business participation was not a factor ('sb': false). Further investigation would be needed to determine if small businesses were subcontracting opportunities.

Oversight & Accountability

The contract's history, including its closure and re-activation, suggests a need for robust oversight to ensure proper management and accountability, especially given the significant value and long duration.

Related Government Programs

Facilities Support Services
General Services Administration Contracting
Public Buildings Service Programs

Risk Flags

Significant contract value.
Long contract duration.
History of contract modifications.
Contract closure and re-activation.
No explicit small business participation noted.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $257.9 million to TRADE CENTER MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATES L.L.C.. TRADE CENTER MANAGER SERVICES 06/05/2013 NOTICE!!!! THE ORGINAL CONTRACT WAS APPROVED BY THIS CONTRACTING OFFICE ON THIS DATE: LAST MODIFIED DATE: 12/03/2008 11:05:19 LAST MODIFIED USER: 11.CARL.CAMPBELL.GSA.GOV THE CONTRACT WAS CLOSED AND TRANSFERRED TO ANOTHER CONTRACT NUMBER WITH AN IMPROPER NUMBER (GS11P09ZGD0064) AS OF THIS DATE 06/05/2013 THIS CONTRACT IS BEING RE-ACTIVATED BECAUSE OF A CONTRACTURAL AGREEMENT ESTABLISHED BY GSA NCR LEAGLE AND THE CUSTOMER.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is TRADE CENTER MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATES L.L.C..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Public Buildings Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $257.9 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2008-11-19. End: 2020-12-31.

What specific services are included under 'Trade Center Manager Services' and how do they align with GSA's mission?

Trade Center Manager Services likely encompass a range of facility operations, maintenance, security, and administrative support for buildings designated as trade centers. These services are crucial for GSA's mission of providing secure, sustainable, and cost-effective facilities for federal agencies. Understanding the precise scope ensures taxpayer funds are used efficiently for essential government functions.

What were the reasons for the contract's closure and subsequent re-activation, and were there any cost implications?

The contract's closure and re-activation, noted as being due to a 'contractural agreement established by GSA NCR LEAGLE and the customer,' suggests a complex administrative or legal resolution. Investigating the specific reasons is vital to understand if this process incurred additional costs or delays, and to prevent similar issues in future procurements.

How does the fixed-price incentive (FPI) structure impact cost control and contractor performance over the contract's extended period?

A Fixed-Price Incentive (FPI) contract aims to share cost savings or overruns between the government and contractor. Over a long duration like this (over 12 years), the effectiveness of the incentive structure depends on clear performance metrics and realistic target costs. It's important to analyze if the FPI successfully motivated cost efficiency and high performance, or if it led to disputes or unexpected cost increases.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Facilities Support Services › Facilities Support Services

Product/Service Code: UTILITIES AND HOUSEKEEPING › HOUSEKEEPING SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Solicitation ID: GS-11P-08-YA-C-0012

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIXED PRICE INCENTIVE (L)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 1300 PENN AVE NW STE 350, WASHINGTON, DC, 20004

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business, Partnership or Limited Liability Partnership, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $285,000,000

Exercised Options: $257,871,670

Current Obligation: $257,871,670

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Timeline