GSA Awards $10.7M Contract to SIGAL Construction for District of Columbia Projects

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $10,691,204 ($10.7M)

Contractor: Sigal Construction Corporation

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2005-11-22

End Date: 2011-12-31

Contract Duration: 2,230 days

Daily Burn Rate: $4.8K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 5

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Construction

Official Description: CES # 2,6 & 10

Place of Performance

Location: WASHINGTON, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA County, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 20407

State: District of Columbia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $10.7 million to SIGAL CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION for work described as: CES # 2,6 & 10 Key points: 1. The contract value of $10.7 million is a significant investment in public infrastructure. 2. SIGAL Construction Corporation secured this award, indicating their competitive standing in the construction sector. 3. The duration of 2230 days suggests a long-term project with potential for cost overruns or efficiencies. 4. The absence of small business participation warrants further investigation into contracting practices.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The award amount of $10.7 million for a 2230-day contract needs comparison with similar GSA construction projects to assess value. Without specific deliverables or scope, a precise benchmark is difficult.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a robust price discovery process. However, the lack of small business participation raises questions about the breadth of competition.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayer funds are being utilized for public infrastructure development. The efficiency of the bidding process and the final cost will determine the ultimate taxpayer impact.

Public Impact

Construction projects impact local economies through job creation and material sourcing. Public buildings are essential for government services and community access. Long-term contracts can lead to sustained economic activity but also carry risks of escalating costs.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of small business participation
Long contract duration

Positive Signals

Full and open competition

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the construction sector, specifically for public buildings. Benchmarks for similar GSA projects would involve comparing award values against square footage, project complexity, and regional construction cost indices.

Small Business Impact

The contract explicitly states that small business participation was not a factor (sb: false). This indicates that opportunities for small businesses may have been missed, potentially limiting broader economic impact.

Oversight & Accountability

The General Services Administration (GSA) is responsible for overseeing federal buildings and infrastructure. Oversight would focus on project execution, adherence to budget, and quality of construction.

Related Government Programs

General Services Administration Contracting
Public Buildings Service Programs

Risk Flags

Lack of small business participation
Long contract duration (2230 days) increases risk of cost escalation
No specific project details provided for value assessment
Potential for cost overruns due to extended timeline

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $10.7 million to SIGAL CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION. CES # 2,6 & 10

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is SIGAL CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Public Buildings Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $10.7 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2005-11-22. End: 2011-12-31.

What specific public buildings or infrastructure improvements were covered by this $10.7 million contract, and how does the scope align with the award amount?

The provided data does not specify the exact nature of the construction or renovation projects. To assess value, details on the scope of work, such as square footage, type of facility, and specific improvements (e.g., new construction, renovation, repairs), are necessary to compare against the $10.7 million award and its 2230-day duration.

Given the full and open competition, why did SIGAL CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION's bid result in no small business participation, and what are the implications for future contracting?

The absence of small business participation despite full and open competition suggests that either no small businesses bid, or their bids were not competitive. This could indicate barriers to entry for small firms or a lack of targeted outreach. Future contracting should explore strategies to encourage small business involvement to foster economic diversity and competition.

How effectively was the firm-fixed-price contract structured to mitigate risks associated with a 2230-day duration, and what mechanisms were in place for cost control?

A firm-fixed-price contract aims to transfer risk to the contractor. However, a 2230-day duration presents significant inflation and unforeseen cost escalation risks. Effective risk mitigation would depend on detailed contract clauses, contingency planning, and robust oversight by the GSA to ensure the fixed price remains fair and the project stays within budget.

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Offers Received: 5

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Contractor Details

Address: 3299 K ST NW, WASHINGTON, DC, 98

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $10,691,204

Exercised Options: $10,691,204

Current Obligation: $10,691,204

Timeline