GSA Facility Maintenance Contract Exceeds $14M, Awarded via Full and Open Competition

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $14,151,211 ($14.2M)

Contractor: WW Contractors, Incorporated

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2004-11-15

End Date: 2017-03-31

Contract Duration: 4,519 days

Daily Burn Rate: $3.1K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Number of Offers Received: 4

Pricing Type: FIXED PRICE WITH ECONOMIC PRICE ADJUSTMENT

Sector: Other

Official Description: FACILITIY MAINTENANCE SERVICES FOR 7 GSA OPERATED BUILDINGS. RECOVERY: AMERICAN REINVESTMENT AND RECOVERY ACT (ARRA) PROJECT. TAS::47 4543::TAS

Place of Performance

Location: PITTSBURGH, ALLEGHENY County, PENNSYLVANIA, 15222

State: Pennsylvania Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $14.2 million to WW CONTRACTORS, INCORPORATED for work described as: FACILITIY MAINTENANCE SERVICES FOR 7 GSA OPERATED BUILDINGS. RECOVERY: AMERICAN REINVESTMENT AND RECOVERY ACT (ARRA) PROJECT. TAS::47 4543::TAS Key points: 1. Contract value of $14.15M for facility maintenance across 7 GSA buildings. 2. Awarded to WW Contractors, Inc. under a Fixed Price with Economic Price Adjustment contract type. 3. Competition method was 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources', suggesting a specific justification. 4. Project was part of the American Reinvestment and Recovery Act (ARRA) initiative. 5. Long contract duration of 4519 days (over 12 years) with an end date in 2017.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $14.15M over 12 years suggests an average annual cost of approximately $1.18M. Without specific service details or benchmarks for similar GSA facilities, a precise pricing assessment is difficult. The economic price adjustment clause introduces variability.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources'. This implies that while competition was sought, certain sources were excluded, potentially impacting the breadth of price discovery and the final negotiated price.

Taxpayer Impact: The use of ARRA funds indicates a specific public investment goal. The contract's duration and price adjustment clause could lead to costs exceeding initial estimates, impacting taxpayer funds over the long term.

Public Impact

Ensures operational continuity for 7 GSA-managed federal buildings. Supports federal agency operations by maintaining critical infrastructure. ARRA funding directed towards infrastructure improvement and job creation. Long-term contract may provide stable service but limits flexibility for adopting newer technologies.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Long contract duration (over 12 years) may lead to outdated services or higher costs over time.
Economic Price Adjustment clause can increase costs beyond initial projections.
Competition method 'After Exclusion of Sources' warrants scrutiny for potential limitations on competition.
No indication of small business participation.

Positive Signals

Awarded under ARRA, indicating investment in infrastructure.
Ensures essential facility maintenance for federal buildings.
Fixed Price contract type provides some cost certainty, albeit with adjustments.

Sector Analysis

Facility maintenance services fall under the broader Facilities Support Services sector. Spending benchmarks for this sector vary widely based on building size, complexity, and location. This contract's value appears substantial given its 12-year duration.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that this contract was not awarded to a small business (ss: false, sb: false). There is no information provided regarding subcontracting opportunities for small businesses within this contract.

Oversight & Accountability

The contract was managed by the General Services Administration (GSA), Public Buildings Service. Oversight would involve monitoring performance, managing the economic price adjustments, and ensuring compliance with ARRA requirements.

Related Government Programs

Facilities Support Services
General Services Administration Contracting
Public Buildings Service Programs

Risk Flags

Long contract duration
Economic Price Adjustment clause
Competition method 'After Exclusion of Sources'
No small business participation indicated
Contract ended in 2017, potential for outdated service delivery

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $14.2 million to WW CONTRACTORS, INCORPORATED. FACILITIY MAINTENANCE SERVICES FOR 7 GSA OPERATED BUILDINGS. RECOVERY: AMERICAN REINVESTMENT AND RECOVERY ACT (ARRA) PROJECT. TAS::47 4543::TAS

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is WW CONTRACTORS, INCORPORATED.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Public Buildings Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $14.2 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2004-11-15. End: 2017-03-31.

What specific criteria led to the exclusion of certain sources in the 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources' award method, and how did this impact the final price?

The exclusion of sources typically occurs when specific technical capabilities, past performance, or security requirements are necessary and only met by a limited number of vendors. Understanding these criteria is crucial to assess if the exclusion was justified or if it unnecessarily limited competition, potentially leading to a higher price than could have been achieved through broader competition.

How did the economic price adjustment (EPA) clause function over the 12-year contract period, and what was the total impact on the final cost compared to a fixed-price contract?

The EPA clause allows for adjustments to the contract price based on fluctuations in specific economic indicators, such as labor or material costs. Analyzing the historical data for this contract would reveal the frequency and magnitude of these adjustments. Understanding the EPA's impact is vital to determine the true cost-effectiveness and whether it provided a fair return for both the government and the contractor.

What was the specific scope of 'Facility Maintenance Services' covered by this contract, and how does its performance align with ARRA goals for infrastructure improvement?

The scope likely included routine maintenance, repairs, and potentially upgrades for HVAC, electrical, plumbing, and structural systems across seven GSA buildings. Evaluating the project's deliverables against ARRA's objectives would determine if it effectively modernized infrastructure, improved energy efficiency, or created sustainable jobs, thereby fulfilling the investment's intended purpose.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Facilities Support Services › Facilities Support Services

Product/Service Code: UTILITIES AND HOUSEKEEPING › HOUSEKEEPING SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Offers Received: 4

Pricing Type: FIXED PRICE WITH ECONOMIC PRICE ADJUSTMENT (K)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 1800 N. CHARLES STREET, BALTIMORE, MD, 21201

Business Categories: Black American Owned Business, Category Business, Emerging Small Business, HUBZone Firm, Minority Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Small Disadvantaged Business, Special Designations, Veteran Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $14,151,211

Exercised Options: $14,151,211

Current Obligation: $14,151,211

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Timeline