SAIC Awarded $132M for Fleet Training Services by US Fleet Forces Command

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $132,003,264 ($132.0M)

Contractor: Science Applications International Corporation

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2015-04-30

End Date: 2024-04-26

Contract Duration: 3,284 days

Daily Burn Rate: $40.2K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE

Sector: Defense

Official Description: IGF::OT::IGF UNITED STATES FLEET FORCES COMMAND REQUIRES HIGHLY SPECIALIZED, COMPREHENSIVE, ANALYTICAL TRAINING AND TECHNICAL SERVICES IN DIRECT SUPPORT OF THEIR FLEET DEPLOYMENT TRAINING PROGRAM. UNDER THIS EFFORT, THE CONTRACTOR WILL PROVIDE LIVE, VIRTUAL, AND CONSTRUCTIVE TRAINING PROGRAM SUPPORT, FLEET TRAINING ACADEMICS AND INSTRUCTION SUPPORT, TRAINING EXERCISE AND EVENT SUPPORT.

Place of Performance

Location: RESTON, FAIRFAX County, VIRGINIA, 20190

State: Virginia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $132.0 million to SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION for work described as: IGF::OT::IGF UNITED STATES FLEET FORCES COMMAND REQUIRES HIGHLY SPECIALIZED, COMPREHENSIVE, ANALYTICAL TRAINING AND TECHNICAL SERVICES IN DIRECT SUPPORT OF THEIR FLEET DEPLOYMENT TRAINING PROGRAM. UNDER THIS EFFORT, THE CONTRACTOR WILL PROVIDE LIVE, VIRTUAL, AND CONSTRUCTIVE TRAI… Key points: 1. Significant contract value of $132M for specialized training and technical services. 2. Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC) is the sole awardee. 3. Contract spans nearly 9 years, indicating long-term support needs. 4. Focus on live, virtual, and constructive training for fleet deployment.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The $132M contract value over 9 years suggests a substantial investment in specialized training. Benchmarking against similar large-scale defense training contracts would be necessary for a precise value assessment, but the duration and scope indicate a fair price for comprehensive support.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. This method generally leads to better price discovery and value for the government.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayer funds are utilized for critical defense training, ensuring fleet readiness and operational effectiveness.

Public Impact

Enhances US Navy fleet readiness through advanced training programs. Supports critical national defense objectives by preparing naval forces. Provides specialized technical services essential for modern warfare simulation. Contributes to the development and execution of complex training exercises.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for cost overruns in Cost Plus Fixed Fee contracts.
Dependence on a single contractor for critical training services.

Positive Signals

Awarded through full and open competition.
Long-term contract ensures continuity of essential services.
Supports vital national defense mission.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Engineering Services sector, specifically supporting defense training. Spending in this area is crucial for maintaining military readiness and technological superiority, with benchmarks often tied to program complexity and duration.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates this contract was not set aside for small businesses and was awarded to a large corporation (SAIC). There is no direct indication of small business subcontracting opportunities within this specific award notice.

Oversight & Accountability

The contract was awarded by the Department of Defense, with oversight likely managed by the Defense Contract Management Agency. The long duration necessitates ongoing monitoring to ensure performance and cost control.

Related Government Programs

Engineering Services
Department of Defense Contracting
Defense Contract Management Agency Programs

Risk Flags

Cost Plus Fixed Fee contract type can lead to cost overruns.
Long contract duration increases risk of obsolescence if not managed.
Sole awardee may limit future competitive opportunities.
High reliance on contractor performance for critical training.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $132.0 million to SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION. IGF::OT::IGF UNITED STATES FLEET FORCES COMMAND REQUIRES HIGHLY SPECIALIZED, COMPREHENSIVE, ANALYTICAL TRAINING AND TECHNICAL SERVICES IN DIRECT SUPPORT OF THEIR FLEET DEPLOYMENT TRAINING PROGRAM. UNDER THIS EFFORT, THE CONTRACTOR WILL PROVIDE LIVE, VIRTUAL, AND CONSTRUCTIVE TRAINING PROGRAM SUPPORT, FLEET TRAINING ACADEMICS AND INSTRUCTION SUPPORT, TRAINING EXERCISE AND EVENT SUPPORT.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Defense Contract Management Agency).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $132.0 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2015-04-30. End: 2024-04-26.

What is the specific breakdown of costs for live, virtual, and constructive training components?

The provided data does not detail the cost breakdown for the different training modalities (live, virtual, constructive). A deeper dive into the contract's financial exhibits or subsequent performance reports would be required to ascertain how the $132M is allocated across these specialized service areas.

What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) used to measure the effectiveness of the training services provided?

Key performance indicators are not detailed in this award notice. Typically, such contracts would include metrics related to trainee performance, exercise success rates, simulation fidelity, and adherence to training objectives. The contracting officer's representative (COR) would monitor these KPIs.

Are there any provisions for technology refresh or updates within the contract to ensure training remains current?

The contract notice does not explicitly mention provisions for technology refresh. Given the nearly 9-year duration, it is crucial that the contract includes mechanisms for incorporating updated technologies and methodologies to maintain the relevance and effectiveness of the training programs.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services › Engineering Services

Product/Service Code: IT AND TELECOM - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS › ADP AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: N0002414R3505

Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE (U)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 12010 SUNSET HILLS RD, RESTON, VA, 20190

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $146,109,585

Exercised Options: $139,372,806

Current Obligation: $132,003,264

Subaward Activity

Number of Subawards: 65

Total Subaward Amount: $109,657,701

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: N0017804D4119

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline