Air Force renovates Dyess AFB HQ for $11.2M, focusing on commercial building construction

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $11,194,383 ($11.2M)

Contractor: Jsr-Ecc, LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2020-05-20

End Date: 2024-12-31

Contract Duration: 1,686 days

Daily Burn Rate: $6.6K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Construction

Official Description: 317TH HEADQUARTERS RENOVATION-DYESS AFB, TX

Place of Performance

Location: DYESS AFB, TAYLOR County, TEXAS, 79607

State: Texas Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $11.2 million to JSR-ECC, LLC for work described as: 317TH HEADQUARTERS RENOVATION-DYESS AFB, TX Key points: 1. The contract value of $11.2 million for headquarters renovation appears reasonable for a project of this scope. 2. Full and open competition was utilized, suggesting a competitive bidding process that should drive value. 3. The project duration of approximately 1686 days (from award to estimated completion) indicates a long-term commitment. 4. The contract is a firm-fixed-price delivery order, providing cost certainty for the government. 5. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 236220 points to commercial and institutional building construction. 6. The project is located in Texas, a state with significant construction activity.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The $11.2 million contract for the Dyess AFB Headquarters renovation is a significant investment. Benchmarking against similar large-scale institutional building projects, the price appears within a reasonable range, assuming the scope includes substantial structural, mechanical, and electrical upgrades. The firm-fixed-price nature of the contract helps mitigate cost overrun risks for the government. Further analysis would require detailed project specifications and comparison with recent construction costs in the Texas region.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources,' which implies that while the competition was broad, specific sources may have been excluded based on predefined criteria. This suggests a competitive process was intended, but the exact number of bidders and the rationale for any exclusions are not detailed. A fully open competition typically yields the best price discovery.

Taxpayer Impact: The use of full and open competition, even with exclusions, generally benefits taxpayers by encouraging multiple bids and driving down costs through market forces.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are the Department of the Air Force personnel stationed at Dyess AFB, who will gain an updated and functional headquarters. The services delivered include the renovation and construction of commercial and institutional buildings. The geographic impact is localized to Dyess Air Force Base in Texas. The project will likely involve a construction workforce, potentially creating temporary employment opportunities in the local Texas area.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for scope creep given the long duration of the project.
Reliance on a single contractor for an extended period could lead to performance issues if not managed closely.
The 'after exclusion of sources' clause warrants further investigation into the specific reasons for exclusion and their impact on competition.

Positive Signals

Firm-fixed-price contract provides cost certainty.
Awarded under a competitive process, suggesting potential for good value.
Project addresses critical infrastructure needs for the Air Force.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the broader construction sector, specifically commercial and institutional building construction (NAICS 236220). The federal government is a significant consumer of construction services for military bases, government buildings, and infrastructure projects. Spending in this area is influenced by infrastructure needs, modernization efforts, and base realignments. Comparable spending benchmarks would involve analyzing other large-scale renovation or new construction projects on federal installations.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that small business participation (ss: false, sb: false) was not a primary set-aside consideration for this specific contract. This suggests the prime contract was awarded to a larger entity, and there is no explicit information on subcontracting goals for small businesses. The impact on the small business ecosystem would depend on whether the prime contractor actively seeks small business subcontractors for specialized services.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the contracting officer and the relevant Air Force base personnel. Accountability measures are embedded in the firm-fixed-price contract terms, with penalties for non-performance or delays. Transparency is generally maintained through contract award databases, though detailed project progress reports may not be publicly accessible. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of fraud, waste, or abuse.

Related Government Programs

Military Base Infrastructure Modernization
Federal Building Construction and Renovation
Department of Defense Facilities Management
Air Force Capital Construction Projects

Risk Flags

Long project duration may increase risk of cost escalation or performance issues.
Exclusion of sources in competition warrants further review for impact on price discovery.
Lack of explicit small business subcontracting goals.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $11.2 million to JSR-ECC, LLC. 317TH HEADQUARTERS RENOVATION-DYESS AFB, TX

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is JSR-ECC, LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Air Force).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $11.2 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2020-05-20. End: 2024-12-31.

What is the specific scope of work for the 317th Headquarters renovation at Dyess AFB?

The provided data does not detail the specific scope of work for the 317th Headquarters renovation. However, the NAICS code 236220 indicates it falls under 'Commercial and Institutional Building Construction.' This typically includes new construction, additions, alterations, and major renovations to non-residential buildings. For a headquarters renovation, this could encompass interior build-outs, HVAC system upgrades, electrical and plumbing work, roofing, facade improvements, and potentially structural repairs. The firm-fixed-price contract suggests a well-defined scope was established prior to award to ensure cost certainty for the government.

How does the $11.2 million contract value compare to similar Air Force renovation projects?

Direct comparison of the $11.2 million contract value for the Dyess AFB headquarters renovation to similar Air Force projects requires access to a database of comparable contracts with detailed scope and location information. However, for a major renovation of a headquarters facility on a large military installation, this value is substantial but not unusual. Factors influencing cost include the size of the building, the extent of the renovation (e.g., gutting and rebuilding vs. cosmetic upgrades), the complexity of systems being updated (e.g., IT infrastructure, security), and regional construction labor and material costs. Without specific project details, it's difficult to provide a precise benchmark, but the amount suggests a comprehensive upgrade.

What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) for this contract, and how is performance being monitored?

The provided data does not explicitly list the Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) for this contract. However, for a construction project of this nature, typical KPIs would likely include adherence to the project schedule (milestones and final completion date), quality of workmanship meeting specified standards, adherence to the firm-fixed-price budget, safety compliance on site, and successful completion of all contractual requirements. Performance monitoring would be conducted by the Air Force's contracting officer's representative (COR) or a designated project manager, who would conduct site visits, review progress reports, and verify deliverables against the contract specifications.

What is the track record of JSR-ECC, LLC in performing similar federal construction contracts?

Information regarding the specific track record of JSR-ECC, LLC in performing similar federal construction contracts is not included in the provided data. A comprehensive assessment would require reviewing their past performance evaluations (e.g., Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System - CPARS), the types and values of previous government contracts they have held, and their history of on-time and within-budget project completion. Federal procurement databases and CPARS are the primary sources for evaluating a contractor's past performance and reliability.

What are the potential risks associated with a long-duration construction contract like this one?

Long-duration construction contracts, such as this one estimated to run from May 2020 to December 2024 (over four years), carry several potential risks. These include the risk of escalating material and labor costs over time, which can be mitigated by the firm-fixed-price structure but may strain the contractor if not accurately estimated. There's also a risk of project delays due to unforeseen site conditions, weather, or changes in requirements. Contractor performance can degrade over extended periods if motivation wanes or key personnel change. Furthermore, the government faces the risk of the contractor becoming financially unstable or going out of business during the contract term. Effective project management, clear communication, and robust oversight are crucial to mitigating these risks.

How does the 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources' clause impact taxpayer value compared to unrestricted full and open competition?

The 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources' clause suggests that while the competition was intended to be broad, certain potential bidders were excluded based on specific criteria. This exclusion, if not well-justified and transparent, could potentially limit the number of bids received, thereby reducing the competitive pressure on pricing. In an unrestricted 'full and open' competition, the maximum number of qualified sources are encouraged to bid, which generally leads to more robust price discovery and potentially better value for taxpayers. The specific impact depends heavily on the rationale behind the exclusions; if exclusions were based on necessary qualifications or security requirements, the impact might be minimal. However, if exclusions were arbitrary, it could lead to a less competitive outcome and potentially higher costs for the government.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Construction › Nonresidential Building Construction › Commercial and Institutional Building Construction

Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCT OF STRUCTURES/FACILITIES › CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 8835 GREAVES LN, SCHERTZ, TX, 78154

Business Categories: Category Business, Limited Liability Corporation, Partnership or Limited Liability Partnership, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $11,194,383

Exercised Options: $11,194,383

Current Obligation: $11,194,383

Actual Outlays: $562,283

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: FA890317D0019

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline