Air Force awards $13.1M contract for Dyess AFB control center renovation to JSR-ECC, LLC

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $13,103,011 ($13.1M)

Contractor: Jsr-Ecc, LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2020-06-08

End Date: 2025-06-13

Contract Duration: 1,831 days

Daily Burn Rate: $7.2K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Construction

Official Description: RENOVATE DEPLOYMENT CONTROL CENTER, B4309 AT DYESS AFB, TX

Place of Performance

Location: DYESS AFB, TAYLOR County, TEXAS, 79607

State: Texas Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $13.1 million to JSR-ECC, LLC for work described as: RENOVATE DEPLOYMENT CONTROL CENTER, B4309 AT DYESS AFB, TX Key points: 1. Contract awarded through full and open competition after exclusion of sources, indicating a potentially competitive process. 2. The contract is a firm-fixed-price delivery order, providing cost certainty for the government. 3. Project duration of 1831 days suggests a significant and complex renovation. 4. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 236220 points to commercial and institutional building construction. 5. The contract value of $13.1 million falls within a moderate spending range for facility renovation projects. 6. The award was made by the Department of the Air Force, a major component of the Department of Defense.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

Benchmarking the value of this specific contract is challenging without more detailed cost breakdowns or comparable project data. However, $13.1 million for a significant renovation of a deployment control center at a major Air Force base appears within a reasonable range for such specialized construction. Further analysis would require comparing the scope of work, materials, and labor costs against similar projects at other military installations or large-scale commercial facilities.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: limited

The contract was awarded under 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources.' This solicitation method suggests that while the competition was intended to be open, certain sources may have been excluded prior to the final award. The specific reasons for exclusion are not detailed, but it implies a more controlled competitive environment than a purely unrestricted full and open competition. The number of bidders is not provided, making it difficult to fully assess the intensity of the competition.

Taxpayer Impact: The 'exclusion of sources' aspect warrants scrutiny to ensure that the exclusion criteria were justified and did not unduly limit competition, potentially impacting the final price paid by taxpayers.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are the Department of the Air Force and military personnel at Dyess Air Force Base, who will gain an updated and functional deployment control center. The services delivered include the renovation and deployment of a critical control center, essential for base operations and command. The geographic impact is localized to Dyess Air Force Base in Texas. The project will likely involve a workforce of construction professionals, including skilled trades, project managers, and support staff.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of transparency regarding the 'exclusion of sources' could mask a less competitive process than implied.
The firm-fixed-price contract type, while offering cost certainty, could lead to higher initial bids if the contractor assumes significant risk.
The long duration of the project (1831 days) increases the potential for unforeseen issues or cost overruns if not meticulously managed.

Positive Signals

Awarded under a 'full and open competition' framework, suggesting an effort to solicit a broad range of potential contractors.
The firm-fixed-price contract type provides budget predictability for the government.
The project addresses a critical infrastructure need for the Air Force at Dyess AFB.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Commercial and Institutional Building Construction sector, specifically for government facilities. The market for large-scale government construction projects is substantial, with significant annual spending by agencies like the Department of Defense. This renovation project is a typical example of how federal agencies invest in maintaining and upgrading their physical infrastructure to support operational readiness and mission requirements. Comparable spending benchmarks would involve analyzing other large-scale construction or renovation contracts awarded by the Air Force or other military branches for similar facility types.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that small business participation (ss and sb fields) was not a specific set-aside criterion for this contract. Therefore, the direct impact on small business set-asides is minimal. However, the prime contractor, JSR-ECC, LLC, may engage small businesses as subcontractors. An analysis of their subcontracting plan would be necessary to determine the extent of small business involvement and its potential benefit to the small business ecosystem.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would primarily fall under the Department of the Air Force's contracting and engineering divisions. Accountability measures are inherent in the firm-fixed-price contract, which holds the contractor responsible for delivering the specified work within the agreed-upon price. Transparency could be enhanced by making detailed project milestones, progress reports, and any change orders publicly available. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse were suspected.

Related Government Programs

Military Base Infrastructure Modernization
Department of Defense Facility Renovation
Air Force Construction Contracts
Deployment Center Upgrades
Federal Building Construction

Risk Flags

Potential for limited competition due to 'exclusion of sources'.
Long project duration increases risk of cost escalation and scope creep.
Lack of detailed cost breakdown makes value assessment difficult.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $13.1 million to JSR-ECC, LLC. RENOVATE DEPLOYMENT CONTROL CENTER, B4309 AT DYESS AFB, TX

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is JSR-ECC, LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Air Force).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $13.1 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2020-06-08. End: 2025-06-13.

What is the track record of JSR-ECC, LLC with federal contracts, particularly within the Department of Defense?

A review of federal contract databases indicates that JSR-ECC, LLC has been awarded multiple contracts, primarily within the construction and facilities maintenance domain. While specific details on past performance metrics for this contractor are not publicly available through this data alone, their presence in the federal contracting space suggests experience with government requirements. Further investigation into their contract history, including any past performance evaluations or reported issues, would be necessary to fully assess their track record. Understanding their experience with similar-sized projects and their performance on firm-fixed-price contracts would provide valuable context for evaluating their capability to successfully execute the Dyess AFB renovation.

How does the awarded amount of $13.1 million compare to similar deployment control center renovations at other military bases?

Direct comparison of the $13.1 million award for the Dyess AFB deployment control center renovation to similar projects is challenging without access to a comprehensive database of comparable federal construction contracts. Factors such as the specific scope of work, the age and condition of the existing facility, the complexity of the required technological integration, and regional labor and material costs can significantly influence project pricing. Generally, renovations of critical operational facilities on military bases can range from several million to tens of millions of dollars, depending on these variables. To provide a more precise benchmark, one would need to identify projects with similar square footage, functional requirements, and renovation scope executed within a comparable timeframe and geographic region.

What are the primary risks associated with a firm-fixed-price contract for a large-scale construction project like this?

The primary risk associated with a firm-fixed-price (FFP) contract for a large-scale construction project is that the contractor assumes most of the cost risk. If the contractor underestimates costs, encounters unforeseen site conditions, or experiences significant material price increases, their profit margin can be severely eroded, potentially leading to project delays or quality compromises if the contractor seeks to cut corners. Conversely, if the contractor's estimate is overly conservative, the government may end up paying a premium. For the government, the risk lies in ensuring the contractor has adequately accounted for all potential issues during the bidding phase and that the scope of work is clearly defined to prevent costly change orders.

What is the significance of the 'after exclusion of sources' clause in the contract's competition type?

The 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources' designation indicates that the solicitation was initially intended to be open to all responsible sources. However, certain potential offerors were excluded from the competition prior to the final award. The reasons for this exclusion are not specified in the provided data but could stem from various factors, such as the contractor's failure to meet specific pre-qualification criteria, past performance issues, or specific requirements of the solicitation that only a subset of companies could meet. This clause suggests a more controlled competitive environment than a standard unrestricted 'full and open' competition, and it raises questions about whether the exclusion process was fully justified and transparent to ensure the best possible value for the government.

How does the duration of 1831 days (approximately 5 years) impact the overall value and risk of this contract?

A project duration of 1831 days, roughly five years, for a deployment control center renovation is substantial and introduces several considerations for value and risk. On the value side, a longer duration might allow for more phased construction, potentially minimizing disruption to base operations. However, it also increases the exposure to market fluctuations in material costs and labor rates over time. From a risk perspective, a five-year timeline significantly elevates the potential for unforeseen challenges, such as changes in technology requirements, evolving security protocols, or unexpected site conditions. Effective project management, robust contingency planning, and clear contract clauses for managing scope changes and price adjustments become critical to mitigating these risks and ensuring the project remains within budget and delivers its intended value.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Construction › Nonresidential Building Construction › Commercial and Institutional Building Construction

Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCT OF STRUCTURES/FACILITIES › CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 8835 GREAVES LN, SCHERTZ, TX, 78154

Business Categories: Category Business, Limited Liability Corporation, Partnership or Limited Liability Partnership, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $13,103,011

Exercised Options: $13,103,011

Current Obligation: $13,103,011

Actual Outlays: $857,603

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: FA890317D0019

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline