DoD's $57.9M Boeing Contract for Wideband Global Satellite Communications Faces Oversight Concerns

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $57,947,972 ($57.9M)

Contractor: THE Boeing Company

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2019-12-19

End Date: 2026-12-31

Contract Duration: 2,569 days

Daily Burn Rate: $22.6K/day

Competition Type: NOT COMPETED

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIXED PRICE INCENTIVE

Sector: IT

Official Description: WIDEBAND GLOBAL SATELLITE-COMMUNICATIONS ORBITAL OPERATIONS, LOGISTICS, AND RESILIENCY

Place of Performance

Location: COLORADO SPRINGS, EL PASO County, COLORADO, 80916

State: Colorado Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $57.9 million to THE BOEING COMPANY for work described as: WIDEBAND GLOBAL SATELLITE-COMMUNICATIONS ORBITAL OPERATIONS, LOGISTICS, AND RESILIENCY Key points: 1. Contract awarded to a single, large incumbent provider, raising questions about competition. 2. Fixed Price Incentive contract type suggests potential for cost overruns if not managed closely. 3. Long duration (2019-2026) indicates a significant, ongoing commitment of taxpayer funds. 4. Lack of small business participation noted, potentially limiting broader economic impact. 5. Engineering Services sector is critical for complex defense systems like satellite communications.

Value Assessment

Rating: questionable

The contract's value of $57.9M over its duration appears substantial for engineering services. Benchmarking against similar satellite operations and logistics contracts is difficult without more granular data, but the lack of competition raises concerns about whether this price reflects optimal value.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: sole-source

This contract was not competed, indicating a sole-source award to The Boeing Company. This limits price discovery and potentially leads to higher costs for the government compared to a competitive environment.

Taxpayer Impact: The sole-source nature of this contract means taxpayers may be paying a premium, as competitive pressures that typically drive down costs are absent.

Public Impact

Ensures critical satellite communication capabilities for the Department of Defense. Supports national security operations by maintaining orbital assets and logistics. Long-term commitment impacts budget allocation for defense spending. Limited small business involvement means fewer opportunities for smaller enterprises in this sector.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

  • Sole-source award limits competition and price discovery.
  • Lack of small business participation.
  • Fixed Price Incentive contract type can lead to cost overruns.
  • Long contract duration requires sustained oversight.

Positive Signals

  • Provides essential satellite communication services.
  • Awarded to a known, experienced contractor.
  • Contract duration aligns with long-term defense needs.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Engineering Services sector, specifically supporting complex satellite communications systems. Spending in this area is crucial for national defense, but often involves high costs due to specialized expertise and technology required.

Small Business Impact

The contract data indicates no small business participation (sb: false). This suggests that opportunities for small businesses within this large, sole-source contract are either non-existent or were not pursued, potentially missing out on innovation and economic benefits.

Oversight & Accountability

The long duration and sole-source nature of this contract necessitate robust oversight from the Department of the Air Force to ensure cost control, performance, and adherence to contract terms. Regular reviews are critical to mitigate risks associated with limited competition.

Related Government Programs

  • Engineering Services
  • Department of Defense Contracting
  • Department of the Air Force Programs

Risk Flags

  • Sole-source award limits competition.
  • Potential for cost overruns with FPI contract.
  • Lack of small business participation.
  • Long contract duration requires sustained oversight.
  • Dependency on a single contractor for critical infrastructure.

Tags

engineering-services, department-of-defense, co, definitive-contract, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $57.9 million to THE BOEING COMPANY. WIDEBAND GLOBAL SATELLITE-COMMUNICATIONS ORBITAL OPERATIONS, LOGISTICS, AND RESILIENCY

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is THE BOEING COMPANY.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Air Force).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $57.9 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2019-12-19. End: 2026-12-31.

What specific factors justified the sole-source award for these critical satellite communication services, and were alternatives explored?

Justification for sole-source awards typically involves unique capabilities, critical national security needs, or lack of viable alternatives. For Wideband Global Satellite Communications, the government might argue that Boeing possesses unique expertise or infrastructure essential for maintaining orbital operations, logistics, and resiliency, making competition impractical or detrimental to mission success. However, a thorough review should confirm that no other qualified vendors could meet these specific, demanding requirements.

How is the government managing the risks associated with the Fixed Price Incentive (FPI) contract type to prevent cost overruns?

The government manages FPI risks through stringent performance metrics, clear target costs, and defined incentive/disincentive clauses. Regular audits, progress reviews, and close monitoring of cost drivers are essential. The Air Force must actively engage with Boeing to ensure efficient operations and cost control, holding the contractor accountable for exceeding agreed-upon targets while rewarding performance that stays within or below projections.

What is the long-term strategy for ensuring competitive sourcing or technological advancement in this satellite communication domain?

The long-term strategy should involve market research to identify potential future competitors or disruptive technologies. The government could consider breaking down future requirements into smaller, more competitive segments, fostering innovation through research and development contracts, or encouraging partnerships that build capacity among smaller firms. Proactive planning is key to avoid perpetual sole-source reliance and ensure cost-effectiveness and access to cutting-edge solutions.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical ServicesArchitectural, Engineering, and Related ServicesEngineering Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT)PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED

Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIXED PRICE INCENTIVE (L)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 320 WOOTEN RD, COLORADO SPRINGS, CO, 80916

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $99,707,901

Exercised Options: $74,794,160

Current Obligation: $57,947,972

Subaward Activity

Number of Subawards: 2

Total Subaward Amount: $68,799

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: YES

Timeline

Start Date: 2019-12-19

Current End Date: 2026-12-31

Potential End Date: 2026-12-31 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2025-12-15

More Contracts from THE Boeing Company

View all THE Boeing Company federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending