DoD's $33M DynCorp contract for Egyptian Personnel Support Services awarded via full and open competition

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $32,946,614 ($32.9M)

Contractor: Dyncorp

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2012-04-01

End Date: 2017-05-31

Contract Duration: 1,886 days

Daily Burn Rate: $17.5K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 6

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: EGYPTIAN PERSONNEL SUPPORT SERVICES (EPSS) IV

Place of Performance

Location: MCLEAN, FAIRFAX County, VIRGINIA, 22102

State: Virginia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $32.9 million to DYNCORP for work described as: EGYPTIAN PERSONNEL SUPPORT SERVICES (EPSS) IV Key points: 1. Contract awarded for facilities support services in Egypt. 2. DynCorp, a significant defense contractor, secured this award. 3. The contract utilized a firm-fixed-price structure, indicating price certainty. 4. Awarded as a definitive contract, suggesting a long-term service agreement. 5. The duration of the contract was over 4 years. 6. No small business set-aside was applied to this procurement.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

Benchmarking the value of this contract is challenging without specific performance metrics or detailed cost breakdowns. The total award amount of approximately $33 million over nearly five years suggests an average annual value of around $6.6 million. This figure needs to be compared against the scope and complexity of the services provided to Egyptian personnel support. Without comparable contract data for similar services in the region or for the specific support functions, a precise value-for-money assessment is difficult. The firm-fixed-price nature provides some cost predictability, but the overall efficiency and effectiveness of the spending are not readily apparent from the provided data.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. The presence of 6 bidders suggests a reasonably competitive environment for this type of service. A higher number of bidders generally leads to more competitive pricing and better value for the government. The fact that multiple companies vied for this contract implies that the market for Egyptian Personnel Support Services is active and that the terms of the solicitation were attractive enough to draw significant interest.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition generally benefits taxpayers by driving down prices through market forces. The presence of multiple bidders suggests that the Department of Defense likely received competitive offers, potentially leading to cost savings compared to a sole-source or limited competition scenario.

Public Impact

Provides essential support services to personnel stationed in Egypt. Enhances the operational readiness and quality of life for military and civilian personnel. Supports U.S. diplomatic and military objectives in the region. Contributes to the local economy in Egypt through employment and resource utilization. Ensures the smooth functioning of facilities critical to mission success.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of detailed performance metrics makes it difficult to assess the effectiveness of the services provided.
Geographic location in Egypt may present unique logistical and security challenges not fully detailed.
Contract duration and value could be subject to scope creep if not managed tightly.

Positive Signals

Awarded through full and open competition, indicating a competitive bidding process.
Firm-fixed-price contract type provides cost certainty for the government.
Multiple bidders (6) suggest a healthy level of market interest and competition.

Sector Analysis

The Facilities Support Services sector encompasses a broad range of services essential for the operation and maintenance of government facilities. This contract falls within the broader defense support services market, which is a significant segment of the federal contracting landscape. The market for such services is often characterized by a mix of large, established defense contractors and specialized service providers. Benchmarking this contract's value requires comparison to similar support service contracts awarded by the DoD or other agencies for operations in similar geographic or geopolitical contexts.

Small Business Impact

This contract was not set aside for small businesses, nor does it appear to have specific subcontracting requirements for small businesses mentioned in the provided data. This suggests that the primary award went to a large business, DynCorp. While large contracts can sometimes trickle down to small businesses through subcontracting, the absence of explicit set-aside or subcontracting goals means direct opportunities for small businesses on this specific prime contract are unlikely. The overall impact on the small business ecosystem would depend on DynCorp's subcontracting practices.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically fall under the Department of the Air Force's contracting and program management offices. As a definitive contract, it likely includes clauses for performance monitoring and reporting. Transparency is generally facilitated through contract award databases like FPDS. Specific oversight mechanisms would include regular performance reviews, audits, and potentially the involvement of an Inspector General if performance issues or fraud were suspected. The firm-fixed-price nature can simplify some aspects of financial oversight.

Related Government Programs

Base Operations Support (BOS)
Logistics and Transportation Services
Facilities Maintenance and Repair
Security Services
Personnel Relocation and Support

Risk Flags

Geopolitical Risk
Logistical Complexity
Security Concerns

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $32.9 million to DYNCORP. EGYPTIAN PERSONNEL SUPPORT SERVICES (EPSS) IV

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is DYNCORP.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Air Force).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $32.9 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2012-04-01. End: 2017-05-31.

What specific types of facilities support services were included under this contract?

The provided data indicates the contract was for 'Facilities Support Services' (NAICS code 561210) related to 'EGYPTIAN PERSONNEL SUPPORT SERVICES (EPSS) IV'. While specific details are not itemized, facilities support services typically encompass a wide range of activities necessary for the upkeep and operation of physical infrastructure. This can include, but is not limited to, maintenance and repair of buildings and grounds, custodial services, pest control, refuse collection, security, mail services, transportation services within the facility or local area, and potentially administrative support related to facility management. Given the context of personnel support in Egypt, these services were likely crucial for ensuring the well-being and operational effectiveness of personnel stationed there.

How does the $33 million award compare to other similar contracts for personnel support services in the Middle East?

Direct comparison of the $33 million award for Egyptian Personnel Support Services (EPSS) IV to other similar contracts in the Middle East is difficult without more granular data on the scope, duration, and specific services rendered. The contract's value of approximately $33 million over 1886 days (roughly 5.17 years) translates to an average annual value of about $6.38 million. This figure needs to be contextualized by the size of the supported personnel population, the complexity of the required services (e.g., housing, food, transportation, security, administrative support), and the specific risks and operating environment in Egypt. Contracts for similar support in other Middle Eastern countries can vary significantly based on local market conditions, geopolitical stability, and the scale of U.S. presence. A comprehensive benchmark would require analyzing contracts with similar NAICS codes (e.g., 561210, 561110) and service descriptions awarded by the DoD or State Department in the region during a comparable timeframe.

What is DynCorp's track record with similar government contracts, particularly in overseas support roles?

DynCorp International has a long and extensive history of providing support services to the U.S. government, particularly in complex overseas environments. The company has been involved in numerous contracts related to aviation, logistics, base operations, security, and personnel support in regions such as the Middle East, Africa, and Afghanistan. Their track record includes large-scale contracts for services like maintaining military aircraft, providing security details, managing base facilities, and supporting deployed personnel. While DynCorp has faced scrutiny and challenges on some contracts regarding performance and cost management, they remain a significant player in the government contracting space, often winning large, complex awards due to their established infrastructure and experience in high-risk or remote locations. The EPSS IV contract represents one of many such engagements demonstrating their capability in providing essential support functions for government operations abroad.

What were the primary risks associated with this contract, and how were they mitigated?

Contracts involving personnel support services in overseas locations like Egypt inherently carry several risks. These can include geopolitical instability, security threats to personnel and facilities, logistical challenges in delivering supplies and services, cultural and language barriers, potential for fraud or corruption, and performance issues related to service quality. For the EPSS IV contract, specific mitigation strategies would likely have been detailed in the contract's performance work statement (PWS) and the contractor's proposal. These could involve robust security protocols, contingency planning for disruptions, clear communication channels, stringent oversight and reporting requirements, and performance metrics tied to payment. The firm-fixed-price nature of the contract also shifts some financial risk to the contractor, incentivizing them to manage costs effectively. However, the specific risks and mitigation plans are not detailed in the provided summary data.

How has spending on facilities support services by the Department of Defense evolved over the years?

Spending on facilities support services by the Department of Defense (DoD) has been a substantial and consistent component of its overall budget. These services are critical for maintaining the vast infrastructure required for military operations, training, and personnel well-being, both domestically and overseas. Over the years, the trend has generally been towards increased outsourcing of these services to private contractors, driven by perceived efficiencies, specialized expertise, and the need for flexibility. This trend accelerated significantly following the post-9/11 conflicts, where large-scale base operations and support contracts were awarded in Iraq, Afghanistan, and other regions. While spending fluctuates based on global security needs, base closures/realignments, and budget priorities, facilities support remains a core requirement. The DoD's reliance on contractors for these services highlights the significant market for companies like DynCorp, operating under various contract types and competition levels.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Facilities Support Services › Facilities Support Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Offers Received: 6

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Computer Sciences Corporation (UEI: 009581091)

Address: 3170 FAIRVIEW PARK DR, FALLS CHURCH, VA, 22042

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $115,902,062

Exercised Options: $34,013,310

Current Obligation: $32,946,614

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Timeline