DoD Awards $391.7M for Building Operations & Maintenance to DynCorp

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $391,707,195 ($391.7M)

Contractor: Dyncorp

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2001-01-25

End Date: 2016-09-23

Contract Duration: 5,720 days

Daily Burn Rate: $68.5K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 4

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: 200104!000073!5700!QA27 !AMC/CONF/LGC !FA445201C0001 !A!Y!*!N! !20010125!20010930!003242013!003242013!003242013!N!DYNCORP !11710 PLAZA AMERICA DRIVE !RESTON !VA!20190!27000!439!48!FORT WORTH !TARRANT !TEXAS !+000011158667!N!N!000000000000!M152!OPERATION/MAINTENANCE BUILDINGS !S1 !SERVICES !3000!NOT DISCERNABLE OR CLASSIFIED !488190!*!*!3! ! ! !*!*!*!B!*!*!A! !A !N!J!2!004!B! !C!N!Z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !A!A!A!A!000!A!C!N! ! ! ! ! ! !0001!

Place of Performance

Location: ANDREWS AFB, PRINCE GEORGES County, MARYLAND, 20762

State: Maryland Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $391.7 million to DYNCORP for work described as: 200104!000073!5700!QA27 !AMC/CONF/LGC !FA445201C0001 !A!Y!*!N! !20010125!20010930!003242013!003242013!003242013!N!DYNCORP !11710 PLAZA AMERICA DRIVE !RESTON !VA!20190!27000!439!48!FORT WORTH !TARRA… Key points: 1. Significant contract value of $391.7 million awarded. 2. DynCorp secured the contract, indicating potential market concentration. 3. Risk of vendor lock-in or performance issues with a single large provider. 4. Spending falls under 'Other Support Activities for Air Transportation' sector.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $391.7 million over its duration appears substantial. Benchmarking against similar facilities maintenance contracts would be necessary for a precise assessment, but the scale suggests a significant investment.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a robust price discovery process. This method generally leads to more competitive pricing for the government.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition aims to ensure taxpayer funds are used efficiently by securing the best value through a competitive bidding process.

Public Impact

Ensures operational readiness of critical facilities. Supports military personnel and operations through maintained infrastructure. Potential for job creation and economic activity in the service sector.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Long contract duration (over 15 years) could lead to complacency or outdated service models.
Concentration of services with one vendor may limit future flexibility.
Performance metrics and oversight are crucial for ensuring value.

Positive Signals

Awarded through full and open competition.
Significant investment in essential facility maintenance.
DynCorp is an established government contractor.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls under the 'Other Support Activities for Air Transportation' sector, which includes a wide range of services supporting aviation operations. Benchmarks for building operations and maintenance within this sector are highly variable based on facility type and location.

Small Business Impact

The data does not indicate specific subcontracting goals or participation by small businesses in this contract. Further analysis would be needed to determine the extent of small business involvement.

Oversight & Accountability

The contract's long duration necessitates robust oversight to ensure continued performance, cost-effectiveness, and adherence to evolving requirements. Regular performance reviews and audits are essential.

Related Government Programs

Other Support Activities for Air Transportation
Department of Defense Contracting
Department of the Air Force Programs

Risk Flags

Long-term contract dependency
Potential for service degradation over time
Vendor lock-in
Oversight challenges due to scale and duration

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $391.7 million to DYNCORP. 200104!000073!5700!QA27 !AMC/CONF/LGC !FA445201C0001 !A!Y!*!N! !20010125!20010930!003242013!003242013!003242013!N!DYNCORP !11710 PLAZA AMERICA DRIVE !RESTON !VA!20190!27000!439!48!FORT WORTH !TARRANT !TEXAS !+000011158667!N!N!000000000000!M152!OPERATION/MAINTENANCE BUILDINGS !S1 !SERVICES !3000!NOT DISCERNABLE OR CLASSIFIED !488190!*!*!3! ! ! !*!*!*!B!*!*!A!

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is DYNCORP.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Air Force).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $391.7 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2001-01-25. End: 2016-09-23.

What specific facilities and services are covered under 'OPERATION/MAINTENANCE BUILDINGS' to understand the full scope of the $391.7 million investment?

The contract likely encompasses a broad range of services including routine maintenance, repairs, janitorial services, HVAC, electrical, and plumbing for various buildings within the specified Air Force installations. The exact scope would be detailed in the contract's Statement of Work (SOW), defining the specific facilities, service levels, and performance standards required to ensure operational readiness and safety.

How does DynCorp's pricing for this contract compare to industry benchmarks for similar building operations and maintenance services, especially given the long duration?

Without access to detailed pricing breakdowns and specific service level agreements, a direct comparison is challenging. However, the firm fixed-price structure suggests DynCorp assumed the risk for cost overruns. The government likely benchmarked against historical data and other competitive bids to ensure fair pricing, but the extended period warrants ongoing scrutiny for potential cost efficiencies or escalations.

What mechanisms are in place to ensure the effectiveness and quality of DynCorp's services over the contract's extensive lifespan, and how are performance issues addressed?

The Department of Defense employs contract officers and technical representatives to monitor performance against the SOW and key performance indicators (KPIs). Mechanisms include regular performance reviews, site inspections, and user feedback. Issues are typically addressed through a progressive approach, starting with informal discussions, formal cure notices, and potentially penalties or termination for persistent failure to meet contractual obligations.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Transportation and Warehousing › Support Activities for Air Transportation › Other Support Activities for Air Transportation

Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, REBUILD EQUIPMENT › MAINT, REPAIR, REBUILD OF EQUIPMENT

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Offers Received: 4

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Computer Sciences Corporation (UEI: 009581091)

Address: 11710 PLAZA AMERICA DRIVE, RESTON, VA, 20190

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Timeline