DoD Air Force Spends $12.8M to Upgrade Aircraft Radios, Replacing Older Models with New Technology

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $12,829,585 ($12.8M)

Contractor: Lockheed Martin Corp

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2025-04-03

End Date: 2031-07-16

Contract Duration: 2,295 days

Daily Burn Rate: $5.6K/day

Competition Type: NOT COMPETED

Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE

Sector: Defense

Official Description: INTEGRATE HIGH FREQUENCY (HF) RADIOS BY REPLACING ARC-190 WITH ARC-260, INTEGRATE ULTRA HIGH FREQUENCY (UHF) RADIOS BY REPLACING ARC-164 WITH ARC-210 GEN 6 AND INTEGRATE VERY HIGH FREQUENCY (VHF) RADIOS BYREPLACING ARC-222 WITH ARC-210 GEN 6

Place of Performance

Location: MARIETTA, COBB County, GEORGIA, 30063

State: Georgia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $12.8 million to LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP for work described as: INTEGRATE HIGH FREQUENCY (HF) RADIOS BY REPLACING ARC-190 WITH ARC-260, INTEGRATE ULTRA HIGH FREQUENCY (UHF) RADIOS BY REPLACING ARC-164 WITH ARC-210 GEN 6 AND INTEGRATE VERY HIGH FREQUENCY (VHF) RADIOS BYREPLACING ARC-222 WITH ARC-210 GEN 6 Key points: 1. Significant investment in modernizing communication systems for enhanced operational capabilities. 2. Sole-source award to Lockheed Martin suggests potential lack of competitive bidding for this specific upgrade. 3. Long contract duration (2025-2031) indicates a phased integration and potential for cost overruns. 4. Focus on HF, UHF, and VHF radio integration points to a comprehensive communication system overhaul.

Value Assessment

Rating: questionable

The contract is Cost Plus Fixed Fee, which can lead to higher costs than fixed-price contracts if not managed carefully. Benchmarking against similar radio integration contracts is difficult without more detailed cost breakdowns.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: sole-source

The contract was not competed, indicating a sole-source award to Lockheed Martin. This limits price discovery and may result in a higher overall cost to the government compared to a competitive process.

Taxpayer Impact: The lack of competition raises concerns about the efficient use of taxpayer funds, as a potentially lower price may have been achievable through a competitive bidding process.

Public Impact

Modernized communication systems will improve the effectiveness and safety of Air Force operations. Potential for increased interoperability between different aircraft and command centers. Long-term sustainment and upgrade costs for these new radio systems will need to be monitored.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

  • Sole-source award limits competition and price discovery.
  • Cost-plus contract type carries inherent cost escalation risks.
  • Long contract duration increases exposure to market fluctuations and potential scope creep.

Positive Signals

  • Upgrades critical communication systems for enhanced operational effectiveness.
  • Standardizes radio technology across multiple aircraft platforms.
  • Long-term contract provides predictable funding for modernization efforts.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Defense sector, specifically Aircraft Manufacturing. Spending on avionics and communication systems is a significant component of defense modernization budgets, aimed at maintaining technological superiority.

Small Business Impact

The data does not indicate any specific provisions or participation goals for small businesses in this contract. As a sole-source award to a large prime contractor, opportunities for small businesses may be limited to subcontracting roles.

Oversight & Accountability

The Cost Plus Fixed Fee structure requires robust oversight to ensure costs are reasonable and allocable. The long duration necessitates continuous monitoring of performance and expenditures by the Department of the Air Force.

Related Government Programs

  • Aircraft Manufacturing
  • Department of Defense Contracting
  • Department of the Air Force Programs

Risk Flags

  • Lack of competition may lead to higher prices.
  • Cost-plus contract type is susceptible to cost overruns.
  • Long contract duration increases risk exposure.
  • Dependency on a single contractor for critical systems.
  • Potential for integration challenges with existing platforms.

Tags

aircraft-manufacturing, department-of-defense, ga, delivery-order, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $12.8 million to LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP. INTEGRATE HIGH FREQUENCY (HF) RADIOS BY REPLACING ARC-190 WITH ARC-260, INTEGRATE ULTRA HIGH FREQUENCY (UHF) RADIOS BY REPLACING ARC-164 WITH ARC-210 GEN 6 AND INTEGRATE VERY HIGH FREQUENCY (VHF) RADIOS BYREPLACING ARC-222 WITH ARC-210 GEN 6

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Air Force).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $12.8 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2025-04-03. End: 2031-07-16.

What is the projected total cost of ownership for these new radio systems over their lifecycle, including maintenance and future upgrades?

The current contract value is $12.8 million, covering integration through July 2031. However, the total cost of ownership is not fully detailed. This will include ongoing sustainment, potential software updates, and eventual replacement or further upgrades. A comprehensive lifecycle cost analysis should be conducted to understand the full financial commitment beyond the initial integration phase.

Were there any attempts to explore competitive alternatives or sole-source justifications before awarding this contract to Lockheed Martin?

The provided data explicitly states the contract was 'NOT COMPETED' and is a 'sole-source' award. This implies that a competitive process was not undertaken. A thorough justification for the sole-source award, detailing why only Lockheed Martin could fulfill the requirement, should exist within the agency's procurement documentation.

How will the effectiveness of these new radio systems be measured, and what are the key performance indicators (KPIs) for this contract?

The effectiveness of the new radio systems will likely be measured by improved communication reliability, range, clarity, and reduced downtime compared to the legacy systems. Key performance indicators could include successful transmission rates, signal integrity metrics, and operational readiness levels achieved post-integration. Formal testing and operational assessments by the Air Force will be crucial.

Industry Classification

NAICS: ManufacturingAerospace Product and Parts ManufacturingAircraft Manufacturing

Product/Service Code: AEROSPACE CRAFT AND STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED

Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE

Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE (U)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 86 SOUTH COBB DR, MARIETTA, GA, 30063

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Manufacturer of Goods, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $102,505,861

Exercised Options: $102,049,714

Current Obligation: $12,829,585

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: FA862520D3000

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2025-04-03

Current End Date: 2031-07-16

Potential End Date: 2031-07-16 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2025-12-16

More Contracts from Lockheed Martin Corp

View all Lockheed Martin Corp federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending