DoD's $104.6M order for GE aircraft engines and parts shows potential value concerns amid limited competition

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $104,593,830 ($104.6M)

Contractor: General Electric Company

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2019-12-13

End Date: 2025-04-20

Contract Duration: 1,955 days

Daily Burn Rate: $53.5K/day

Competition Type: NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Defense

Official Description: FOR BAHRAIN THERE IS AN ORDER FOR 16 INSTALL ENGINES, 6 SPARE ENGINES, AND 16 EMSCS.

Place of Performance

Location: CINCINNATI, HAMILTON County, OHIO, 45215

State: Ohio Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $104.6 million to GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY for work described as: FOR BAHRAIN THERE IS AN ORDER FOR 16 INSTALL ENGINES, 6 SPARE ENGINES, AND 16 EMSCS. Key points: 1. The contract's value appears high relative to the quantity of engines and spare parts ordered. 2. Limited competition for specialized aircraft engine components can lead to higher prices. 3. The long duration of the contract (over 5 years) warrants close monitoring for cost escalation. 4. This spending falls within the broader category of aircraft engine and parts manufacturing. 5. The reliance on a single supplier for critical components presents a potential supply chain risk. 6. The absence of a small business set-aside suggests a focus on large, specialized contractors.

Value Assessment

Rating: questionable

The total award of $104.6 million for 16 install engines, 6 spare engines, and 16 EMSCs averages to approximately $2.75 million per installed engine, which seems high. Benchmarking against similar sole-source or limited-competition procurements for advanced military aircraft engines is difficult without more specific component details. However, the unit cost for engines and associated parts warrants scrutiny to ensure fair and reasonable pricing, especially given the lack of competitive pressure.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: sole-source

This contract was not competed and was awarded on a sole-source basis to General Electric Company. This indicates that GE is likely the only approved or capable manufacturer for these specific aircraft engines and associated parts. The lack of competition means the government did not benefit from price discovery through a bidding process, potentially leading to a higher price than if multiple vendors had competed.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayers may be paying a premium due to the absence of competitive bidding. Without alternative suppliers, the government has limited leverage to negotiate lower prices.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are the U.S. Air Force units operating the aircraft requiring these engines. The services delivered include the provision of new aircraft engines, spare engines, and Engine Monitoring and Control Systems (EMCS). The geographic impact is primarily within the Department of Defense's operational theaters globally. This contract supports high-skilled jobs within the aerospace manufacturing sector, specifically at General Electric.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

  • Potential for overpayment due to sole-source award.
  • Risk of supply chain disruption if GE faces production issues.
  • Lack of transparency in pricing without competitive bids.
  • Long contract duration increases exposure to cost overruns.
  • Dependence on a single contractor for critical aviation components.

Positive Signals

  • Ensures availability of critical components for Air Force operations.
  • Leverages specialized expertise of a known, established manufacturer.
  • Provides necessary parts to maintain fleet readiness.
  • Supports a key defense industrial base supplier.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the aerospace and defense manufacturing sector, specifically focusing on aircraft engines and parts. The market for advanced military aircraft engines is highly concentrated, often dominated by a few large, specialized firms like General Electric. Spending in this area is critical for national security and fleet readiness, but the high barriers to entry and specialized nature of the products often lead to limited competition and higher unit costs compared to more commoditized manufacturing sectors.

Small Business Impact

The contract was not set aside for small businesses, nor does it appear to involve significant subcontracting opportunities for small businesses based on the provided data. This is typical for highly specialized, large-scale procurements where the prime contractor possesses unique capabilities and manufacturing infrastructure. The focus is on ensuring the prime contractor's ability to deliver complex, high-value components.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would primarily fall under the Department of the Air Force's contracting and program management offices. Accountability measures would include performance monitoring, delivery schedules, and quality control. Transparency is limited due to the sole-source nature, but contract modifications and payment milestones would be tracked. The Inspector General's office could investigate allegations of fraud, waste, or abuse.

Related Government Programs

  • Aircraft Engine Maintenance and Repair
  • Aerospace Parts Manufacturing
  • Defense Logistics and Support
  • Military Aircraft Procurement
  • Propulsion Systems for Aircraft

Risk Flags

  • Sole-source procurement
  • High unit cost potential
  • Long contract duration
  • Critical component dependency

Tags

defense, department-of-defense, air-force, aircraft-engine, general-electric, sole-source, firm-fixed-price, engines-and-engine-parts, delivery-order, large-contract, ohio, 2019-procurement

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $104.6 million to GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY. FOR BAHRAIN THERE IS AN ORDER FOR 16 INSTALL ENGINES, 6 SPARE ENGINES, AND 16 EMSCS.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Air Force).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $104.6 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2019-12-13. End: 2025-04-20.

What is the historical spending pattern for similar aircraft engines and parts procured by the Department of Defense from General Electric?

Analyzing historical spending for comparable General Electric aircraft engines and parts requires access to detailed contract databases. However, large sole-source awards for military jet engines and components are not uncommon, reflecting the specialized nature of the industry. Past procurements often involve multi-year contracts with significant dollar values, driven by fleet modernization, sustainment, and upgrade programs. Without specific engine model data, direct comparisons are challenging, but trends generally show sustained, high-value investment in propulsion systems due to their critical role and complex manufacturing requirements. Fluctuations in spending can be linked to new aircraft programs, service life extensions, or depot-level maintenance requirements.

How does the unit cost of these engines compare to commercial aircraft engines of similar size and capability?

Direct comparison between military and commercial aircraft engine unit costs is complex due to differing performance requirements, materials, testing protocols, and production volumes. Military engines often incorporate advanced technologies for higher thrust-to-weight ratios, enhanced durability in harsh environments, and specific stealth or survivability features, which can significantly increase costs. Furthermore, military procurements are often sole-source or limited-competition, lacking the price pressures found in the high-volume commercial market. While commercial engines might be cheaper on a per-unit basis due to economies of scale, the specialized nature and unique demands of military applications justify a higher cost for defense-specific propulsion systems.

What are the specific risks associated with relying on a sole-source supplier for critical aircraft engine components?

Relying on a sole-source supplier like General Electric for critical aircraft engine components presents several risks. Firstly, there's a significant price risk, as the government lacks competitive leverage to negotiate lower prices, potentially leading to overpayment. Secondly, supply chain risk is elevated; any production delays, quality issues, or disruptions at the supplier's facility can directly impact fleet readiness and operational capability. Thirdly, there's a technological risk, as the government may become locked into a specific manufacturer's technology, making future upgrades or transitions to alternative systems more difficult and costly. Finally, long-term dependence can reduce the government's bargaining power and flexibility in future contract negotiations.

What performance metrics or key performance indicators (KPIs) are likely being used to evaluate General Electric's performance under this contract?

Under this contract, General Electric's performance is likely evaluated against several Key Performance Indicators (KPIs). These would typically include on-time delivery of engines and spare parts, adherence to quality standards (e.g., defect rates, compliance with specifications), and potentially engine reliability and performance metrics once installed and operational. For Engine Monitoring and Control Systems (EMCS), KPIs might focus on data accuracy, system uptime, and responsiveness. Contractual terms often specify acceptable performance thresholds, with penalties for non-compliance and potential incentives for exceeding expectations. Regular technical reviews and progress reports would be used to track adherence to these KPIs.

What is the anticipated impact of these new engines and spare parts on the operational readiness and capabilities of the Air Force fleet?

The acquisition of 16 new install engines, 6 spare engines, and 16 EMCS is intended to directly enhance the operational readiness and capabilities of the specific Air Force fleet utilizing these engines. New engines typically offer improved performance, fuel efficiency, and reliability compared to older units, reducing unscheduled maintenance and increasing aircraft availability. Spare engines ensure that aircraft can be quickly returned to service following component failures or during scheduled maintenance, minimizing downtime. The EMCS likely provides enhanced diagnostics and predictive maintenance capabilities, allowing for proactive issue resolution and potentially extending engine life, thereby bolstering overall fleet readiness and mission capability.

Industry Classification

NAICS: ManufacturingAerospace Product and Parts ManufacturingAircraft Engine and Engine Parts Manufacturing

Product/Service Code: ENGINES AND TURBINES AND COMPONENT

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 1 NEUMANN WAY, CINCINNATI, OH, 45215

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Manufacturer of Goods, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $104,593,830

Exercised Options: $104,593,830

Current Obligation: $104,593,830

Subaward Activity

Number of Subawards: 37

Total Subaward Amount: $6,391,374

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: YES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: FA862618D0029

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2019-12-13

Current End Date: 2025-04-20

Potential End Date: 2025-04-20 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2025-05-07

More Contracts from General Electric Company

View all General Electric Company federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending