Air Force awards $218M contract for U-2 data support and sustainment to L3 Technologies
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $21,790,828 ($21.8M)
Contractor: L3 Technologies, Inc.
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2023-10-24
End Date: 2026-04-07
Contract Duration: 896 days
Daily Burn Rate: $24.3K/day
Competition Type: NOT COMPETED
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Defense
Official Description: U-2 DATA LINKS SUPPORT AND SUSTAINMENT
Place of Performance
Location: SALT LAKE CITY, SALT LAKE County, UTAH, 84116
State: Utah Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $21.8 million to L3 TECHNOLOGIES, INC. for work described as: U-2 DATA LINKS SUPPORT AND SUSTAINMENT Key points: 1. Contract value represents a significant investment in maintaining critical intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance (ISR) capabilities. 2. Sole-source award raises questions about potential lack of competition and its impact on pricing. 3. Long-term duration of the contract suggests a need for sustained support for the U-2 platform. 4. Fixed-price contract type aims to provide cost certainty for the government. 5. The contract is managed by the Department of the Air Force, indicating its strategic importance within the service. 6. Focus on data links and sustainment highlights the evolving nature of ISR operations.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
Benchmarking the value of this contract is challenging due to its sole-source nature and specific technical requirements for the U-2 platform. Without competitive bids, it's difficult to definitively assess if the $218 million represents optimal value for money. However, the firm fixed-price structure provides some cost control. The duration of the contract (nearly 2.5 years) suggests a substantial scope of work, and the pricing will need to be closely monitored against any future similar sole-source awards or internal cost estimates.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: sole-source
This contract was awarded on a sole-source basis, meaning L3 Technologies was the only vendor considered. This typically occurs when a specific capability or proprietary technology is required, or when only one vendor can meet the urgent needs of the government. The lack of competition means that the government did not benefit from a bidding process that could have driven down prices or spurred innovation from multiple sources. This approach limits price discovery and may result in higher costs than a competitively bid contract.
Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayers may be paying a premium due to the absence of competitive pressure. Without multiple bids, there is less assurance that the price reflects the lowest possible cost for the required services.
Public Impact
The primary beneficiaries are the U.S. Air Force and its intelligence and operational units that rely on the U-2 platform for critical ISR data. The contract delivers essential support and sustainment services, ensuring the continued operational readiness of the U-2 aircraft and its associated data link systems. Geographic impact is likely global, as U-2 aircraft are deployed to various theaters of operation worldwide. Workforce implications include the potential for continued employment for specialized technical personnel at L3 Technologies and potentially at Air Force bases supporting the U-2 program.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Sole-source award limits competitive pricing and potentially reduces innovation.
- Long-term sustainment contracts can become costly if not managed effectively.
- Dependence on a single contractor for critical platform support poses a risk.
Positive Signals
- Firm fixed-price contract provides cost certainty.
- Contract addresses critical sustainment needs for an important ISR platform.
- L3 Technologies likely possesses specialized expertise for U-2 systems.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the aerospace and defense sector, specifically focusing on aircraft sustainment and data link technologies. The market for such specialized services is often characterized by a limited number of highly capable contractors due to the technical expertise and security clearances required. The U-2 program, while aging, remains a vital asset, necessitating ongoing investment in its support infrastructure. Comparable spending benchmarks would typically involve other long-term sustainment contracts for complex military aircraft or intelligence systems.
Small Business Impact
This contract does not appear to involve a small business set-aside, as the awardee is L3 Technologies, Inc., a large defense contractor. There is no explicit information provided regarding subcontracting plans for small businesses. Therefore, the direct impact on the small business ecosystem is likely minimal unless L3 Technologies voluntarily engages small businesses for specific components or services not detailed in this award notice.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract will primarily reside with the Department of the Air Force, specifically the contracting activity within the Air Force Materiel Command or a similar entity responsible for aircraft sustainment. Accountability measures are embedded in the firm fixed-price contract terms, requiring L3 Technologies to deliver specified services within agreed-upon costs. Transparency is generally limited for sole-source awards, but contract performance metrics and financial reporting would be subject to government review. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of fraud, waste, or abuse.
Related Government Programs
- U-2 Aircraft Sustainment Programs
- Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance (ISR) Systems Support
- Aerospace Engineering Services
- Defense Data Link Technologies
- Air Force Aviation Support Contracts
Risk Flags
- Sole-source award may lead to higher costs.
- Long-term sustainment contracts require diligent oversight.
- Dependence on a single contractor poses a risk.
Tags
defense, air-force, intelligence-surveillance-reconnaissance, aircraft-sustainment, data-links, sole-source, firm-fixed-price, l3-technologies, utah, engineering-services
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $21.8 million to L3 TECHNOLOGIES, INC.. U-2 DATA LINKS SUPPORT AND SUSTAINMENT
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is L3 TECHNOLOGIES, INC..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Air Force).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $21.8 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2023-10-24. End: 2026-04-07.
What is L3 Technologies' track record with the U-2 program or similar ISR platforms?
L3 Technologies, Inc. (now part of L3Harris Technologies) has a significant history of providing support services to various defense platforms, including avionics, electronic warfare, and communication systems. While specific details on their involvement with the U-2 program prior to this award are not explicitly detailed in the provided data, their broad capabilities in aerospace and defense suggest a strong foundation for undertaking such a contract. The company has consistently been a major contractor for the Department of Defense across multiple domains. Their experience with complex systems integration and sustainment for other high-value military assets would be a key indicator of their capability to fulfill the requirements of this U-2 data link and sustainment contract.
How does the $218 million contract value compare to historical spending on U-2 sustainment?
Direct historical spending comparisons for this specific 'U-2 DATA LINKS SUPPORT AND SUSTAINMENT' contract are not readily available within the provided data snippet. However, the $218 million award over approximately 2.5 years (896 days) indicates a substantial annual expenditure for maintaining the U-2's data capabilities and overall operational readiness. The U-2 program has been in service for decades, and its sustainment costs over its lifecycle have been significant. Without access to historical contract databases or specific program budget documents, it's difficult to provide a precise benchmark. However, given the specialized nature of ISR platforms and the ongoing need for technological updates and maintenance, this figure appears consistent with the high costs associated with supporting legacy, yet critical, military aviation assets.
What are the primary risks associated with a sole-source award for critical ISR sustainment?
The primary risks associated with a sole-source award for critical ISR sustainment, such as this U-2 contract, revolve around cost and innovation. Without competition, the government lacks the leverage to negotiate the lowest possible price, potentially leading to inflated costs for taxpayers. There is also a reduced incentive for the sole contractor to innovate or improve efficiency, as there is no competitive pressure to do so. Furthermore, reliance on a single provider can create vulnerabilities if that contractor experiences financial difficulties, operational issues, or decides to exit the market. This dependence can also limit the government's flexibility in adopting new technologies or alternative solutions that might emerge from a more competitive landscape.
How effective is the firm fixed-price contract type in managing costs for this type of service?
The firm fixed-price (FFP) contract type is generally considered effective in managing costs for services where the scope of work is well-defined and risks can be reasonably estimated. For sustainment and data link support of the U-2, an FFP contract provides cost certainty to the government, as the contractor assumes the risk of cost overruns. This incentivizes the contractor to control costs efficiently to maximize profit. However, the effectiveness can be diminished if the initial scope definition is inadequate or if unforeseen technical challenges arise, potentially leading to change orders or disputes. In a sole-source scenario, the baseline price is critical, and robust government cost analysis is essential to ensure the FFP represents fair value.
What are the potential implications of this contract on the future of the U-2 program?
This contract signifies the continued reliance on and investment in the U-2 platform for critical ISR missions, at least through April 2026. The focus on data links suggests an effort to maintain or enhance the aircraft's ability to transmit and receive vital intelligence in modern operational environments. While the U-2 is an aging platform, contracts like this indicate that it will remain a key asset for the Air Force for the foreseeable future, potentially delaying or influencing decisions about its eventual replacement. The sustainment of its data capabilities is crucial for its operational relevance, especially in contested environments where real-time information is paramount.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services › Engineering Services
Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED
Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 640 N 2200 W, SALT LAKE CITY, UT, 84116
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Manufacturer of Goods, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $27,618,301
Exercised Options: $22,233,972
Current Obligation: $21,790,828
Subaward Activity
Number of Subawards: 5
Total Subaward Amount: $218,375
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: YES
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: FA852821D0001
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2023-10-24
Current End Date: 2026-04-07
Potential End Date: 2026-04-07 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2025-12-18
More Contracts from L3 Technologies, Inc.
- 63 Each of the Following Hardware Items for the Bradley Fighting Vehicle System (bfvs): Thor Hmpt 800HP Reman Transmission, NSN 2520-01-626-5061 TCM Electronic Assembly, NSN 2520-01-627-6468 Shift Tower, NSN 2520-01-465-5184 TEC Cable, NSN 6150-01-631-6134 — $456.5M (Department of Defense)
- Purchase of 538 EA E-Rovers — $401.1M (Department of Defense)
- Federal Contract — $395.7M (Department of Defense)
- CEC System Production and Repair — $315.9M (Department of Defense)
- Undersea Warfare Training Range (uswtr) Program Requirements Will Provide the Capability for Undersea Warfare (USW) Training and Assessment in Shallow Water and Deep Water Under Adverse Conditions for AIR, Surface, and Subsurface Forces — $267.9M (Department of Defense)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)