DoD's $4.3M custodial services contract awarded to Good Vocations, Inc. for Georgia Air Force base

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $4,300,657 ($4.3M)

Contractor: Good Vocations, Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2025-10-01

End Date: 2026-09-30

Contract Duration: 364 days

Daily Burn Rate: $11.8K/day

Competition Type: NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: FY26 CSAG CUSTODIAL TASK ORDER

Place of Performance

Location: WARNER ROBINS, HOUSTON County, GEORGIA, 31098

State: Georgia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $4.3 million to GOOD VOCATIONS, INC. for work described as: FY26 CSAG CUSTODIAL TASK ORDER Key points: 1. Contract awarded for janitorial services, indicating a need for facility maintenance. 2. The contract is a firm-fixed-price delivery order, providing cost certainty. 3. Duration of the contract is one year, suggesting a recurring need. 4. The award was not competitively solicited, raising questions about price discovery. 5. The contract is a small portion of overall federal spending on facilities maintenance. 6. Geographic focus on Georgia for Air Force operations.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

Benchmarking the value of this $4.3 million custodial services contract is challenging without more detailed service scope and performance metrics. However, the firm-fixed-price structure offers predictability. Compared to similar janitorial service contracts, the pricing appears within a reasonable range, though a lack of competition limits a robust value assessment. Further analysis would require understanding the specific square footage, service frequency, and specialized cleaning requirements.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: sole-source

This contract was awarded on a sole-source basis, meaning it was not open to competition from other vendors. The data indicates it was 'NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION'. This approach is typically used when only one vendor can provide the required services, or in specific circumstances like urgent needs or existing specialized relationships. The lack of competition means that taxpayers may not have benefited from the potentially lower prices that could have resulted from a bidding process.

Taxpayer Impact: Sole-source awards can lead to higher costs for taxpayers as the government does not leverage competitive pressures to drive down prices. This limits the opportunity for cost savings.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are the personnel and operations at the specified Air Force base in Georgia, who will receive maintained and sanitary facilities. The service delivered is janitorial and custodial maintenance, crucial for operational readiness and health standards. The geographic impact is localized to the specific Air Force installation in Georgia. This contract supports a small number of jobs directly related to custodial services, likely through the contractor, Good Vocations, Inc.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of competition may result in suboptimal pricing for taxpayers.
Limited transparency into the justification for sole-source award.
Potential for vendor lock-in if services are highly specialized.

Positive Signals

Firm-fixed-price contract provides cost certainty for the government.
Contract duration of one year allows for periodic reassessment of needs.
Focus on essential facility maintenance ensures operational support.

Sector Analysis

The janitorial services sector is a significant component of the broader facilities management industry. Federal agencies, like the Department of the Air Force, are consistent buyers of these services to maintain a wide range of installations. While this specific contract is for $4.3 million, the total federal spending on custodial and janitorial services is considerably higher, spread across numerous agencies and locations. This contract fits within the operational support category for defense infrastructure.

Small Business Impact

This contract does not appear to be a small business set-aside, as indicated by 'sb': false. There is no explicit information provided regarding subcontracting plans or their impact on the small business ecosystem. Without a set-aside or specific subcontracting goals, the direct benefit to small businesses from this particular award is likely minimal, unless Good Vocations, Inc. is itself a small business and utilizes other small businesses in its supply chain.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically fall under the contracting officer's representative (COR) at the Department of the Air Force, responsible for monitoring performance and ensuring compliance with contract terms. Accountability is managed through the firm-fixed-price structure, which obligates the contractor to deliver services at the agreed-upon price. Transparency is limited due to the sole-source nature of the award, with the justification for this approach being key to understanding the decision.

Related Government Programs

Federal Facilities Maintenance Contracts
Department of Defense Base Operations Support
Air Force Installation and Mission Support Contracts
Janitorial and Cleaning Services Federal Procurement

Risk Flags

Sole-source award lacks competitive pricing pressure.
Limited transparency into the justification for non-competition.
Potential for higher costs to taxpayers due to lack of bidding.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $4.3 million to GOOD VOCATIONS, INC.. FY26 CSAG CUSTODIAL TASK ORDER

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is GOOD VOCATIONS, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Air Force).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $4.3 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2025-10-01. End: 2026-09-30.

What is the specific justification for awarding this custodial services contract on a sole-source basis?

The provided data states the contract was 'NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION', indicating a sole-source award. The specific justification for this determination is not detailed in the provided data. Typically, sole-source awards are made when only one responsible source is available to satisfy the agency's needs. This could be due to unique capabilities, proprietary technology, urgent and compelling circumstances, or other factors outlined in federal acquisition regulations. Without further documentation from the agency, the precise reason remains unknown, but it implies that a competitive bidding process was deemed impractical or impossible for this particular requirement.

How does the $4.3 million contract value compare to similar janitorial services contracts awarded by the Department of Defense?

Comparing this $4.3 million contract value to similar janitorial services contracts requires access to a broader dataset of federal procurements. However, for a one-year duration, this value suggests a substantial scope of services, likely covering a large facility or multiple buildings on an Air Force base. Contracts for janitorial services can vary widely based on the size of the facility, frequency of service, specific cleaning requirements (e.g., medical-grade cleaning), and geographic location. Without knowing the exact square footage and service level agreement for this contract, a precise comparison is difficult. However, it falls within the mid-to-large range for single-installation custodial contracts.

What are the potential risks associated with a sole-source award for essential services like custodial maintenance?

The primary risk associated with a sole-source award for essential services like custodial maintenance is the potential for inflated pricing due to the lack of competition. When a contract is not competed, the government loses the opportunity to leverage market forces to secure the best possible price. Other risks include reduced innovation, as the incumbent contractor may have less incentive to improve services or efficiency, and potential vendor lock-in, making it difficult to switch providers in the future. Furthermore, a sole-source award can raise concerns about fairness and equal opportunity for other capable businesses.

What performance metrics or service level agreements are typically included in such custodial contracts to ensure quality?

Custodial service contracts typically include detailed performance metrics and service level agreements (SLAs) to ensure quality and accountability. These often cover aspects such as cleanliness standards for different areas (e.g., restrooms, common areas, offices), response times for reported issues, waste removal frequency, and adherence to safety protocols. Metrics might include inspection scores, customer satisfaction surveys, and timely completion of scheduled tasks. For a contract of this size, a dedicated COR would likely monitor these metrics closely, with potential financial implications for the contractor if SLAs are not met.

What is the historical spending pattern for custodial services at this specific Air Force base or for the Department of the Air Force in general?

Historical spending patterns for custodial services at this specific Air Force base or within the Department of the Air Force (DAF) are not detailed in the provided data. However, federal agencies consistently require janitorial and custodial services to maintain their facilities. Spending in this category is generally stable, driven by the ongoing need for facility upkeep. Analyzing past contracts for similar services at this installation or within the DAF could reveal trends in contract values, duration, and competition levels, providing context for the current award. Without this historical data, it's difficult to assess if this $4.3 million award represents an increase or decrease compared to previous spending.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Services to Buildings and Dwellings › Janitorial Services

Product/Service Code: UTILITIES AND HOUSEKEEPING › HOUSEKEEPING SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 5171 EISENHOWER PKWY, MACON, GA, 31206

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Tax Exempt, Nonprofit Organization, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $4,300,657

Exercised Options: $4,300,657

Current Obligation: $4,300,657

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: FA850124D0011

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline