DoD awards $39.5M for Egyptian Air Force engine kits, raising questions on competition and value

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $39,522,598 ($39.5M)

Contractor: General Electric Company

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2017-09-20

End Date: 2017-12-29

Contract Duration: 100 days

Daily Burn Rate: $395.2K/day

Competition Type: NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Defense

Official Description: SERVICE LIFE EXTENSION PROGRAM (SLEP) KITS FOR EGYPTIAN AIR FORCE

Place of Performance

Location: CINCINNATI, HAMILTON County, OHIO, 45215

State: Ohio Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $39.5 million to GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY for work described as: SERVICE LIFE EXTENSION PROGRAM (SLEP) KITS FOR EGYPTIAN AIR FORCE Key points: 1. Contract awarded on a sole-source basis, limiting price discovery and potentially increasing costs. 2. Limited competition raises concerns about achieving best value for taxpayer funds. 3. The contract's short duration and specific nature may indicate a niche requirement. 4. Performance context is limited due to the lack of competitive bidding. 5. Sector positioning within aircraft engine parts manufacturing is noted, but specific market dynamics are unclear. 6. The absence of small business involvement is a missed opportunity for economic inclusion.

Value Assessment

Rating: questionable

The contract value of $39.5 million for Service Life Extension Program (SLEP) kits for the Egyptian Air Force appears high given the short delivery period of approximately three months. Without competitive bidding, it is difficult to benchmark the pricing against market rates or similar contracts. The sole-source nature prevents an assessment of whether the government secured the best possible price and value. Further analysis would be needed to determine if the awarded price reflects fair and reasonable costs for the specified kits and services.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: sole-source

This contract was awarded on a sole-source basis, meaning it was not competed. The data indicates the contract type was 'NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION'. This lack of competition means that only one vendor, General Electric Company, was considered. Consequently, there were no other bidders to drive down prices through a competitive process, and the government did not have the opportunity to evaluate multiple proposals to ensure the best value was obtained.

Taxpayer Impact: Sole-source awards limit the government's ability to leverage competition to secure lower prices, potentially leading to higher costs for taxpayers. Without a competitive process, there is less assurance that the awarded price is the most economical option available.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiary of this contract is the Egyptian Air Force, receiving critical components for their aircraft. The services delivered involve the provision of Service Life Extension Program (SLEP) kits for aircraft engines. The geographic impact is primarily focused on supporting a foreign military partner's aviation assets. Workforce implications are likely concentrated within General Electric Company's manufacturing and logistics operations.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

  • Sole-source award limits competitive pricing and value assessment.
  • Lack of transparency in the procurement process due to no-bid award.
  • Potential for inflated costs without competitive pressure.
  • No small business participation noted, missing economic development opportunities.

Positive Signals

  • Supports a key foreign military partner's operational readiness.
  • Procurement of specialized kits for aircraft engine maintenance.
  • Awarded to a known manufacturer with likely relevant expertise.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Aircraft Engine and Engine Parts Manufacturing sector, a specialized segment of the aerospace industry. The market for military aircraft components, particularly for foreign military sales, is often characterized by limited suppliers due to technical expertise and security requirements. Benchmarking spending in this area is challenging without more data on comparable international sales and specific kit configurations. The value of this contract, while substantial, represents a specific procurement rather than broad sector spending.

Small Business Impact

This contract did not involve any small business set-asides, nor is there any indication of subcontracting opportunities for small businesses. The sole-source nature of the award to a large prime contractor like General Electric Company means that the direct benefits and potential for small business participation are minimal in this specific transaction. This represents a missed opportunity to engage the small business industrial base in supporting foreign military sales.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would primarily fall under the Department of Defense's contracting and financial management regulations. As a foreign military sale, there may be additional oversight from relevant defense security cooperation agencies. Transparency is limited due to the sole-source nature of the award. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply to any allegations of fraud, waste, or abuse related to the contract execution.

Related Government Programs

  • Foreign Military Sales Program
  • Aircraft Engine Maintenance and Repair
  • Defense Logistics Agency (DLA) Support
  • Aerospace Parts Manufacturing

Risk Flags

  • Sole-source award
  • Lack of competitive bidding
  • Limited transparency
  • Potential for overpricing

Tags

defense, department-of-defense, department-of-the-air-force, aircraft-engine-and-engine-parts-manufacturing, sole-source, foreign-military-sale, firm-fixed-price, delivery-order, general-electric-company, egyptian-air-force, service-life-extension-program

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $39.5 million to GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY. SERVICE LIFE EXTENSION PROGRAM (SLEP) KITS FOR EGYPTIAN AIR FORCE

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Air Force).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $39.5 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2017-09-20. End: 2017-12-29.

What is the specific type of aircraft engine these SLEP kits are intended for, and what is the operational significance for the Egyptian Air Force?

The provided data does not specify the exact aircraft or engine model for which the Service Life Extension Program (SLEP) kits are intended. However, SLEP programs are crucial for extending the operational lifespan of aging aircraft engines, thereby enhancing their reliability, performance, and safety. For the Egyptian Air Force, these kits likely support a critical component of their fleet, ensuring continued operational readiness and potentially delaying the need for costly new aircraft acquisitions. The significance lies in maintaining the airworthiness and combat capability of their existing air assets through proactive maintenance and upgrades.

Can the $39.5 million contract value be benchmarked against similar sole-source awards for engine kits to other foreign partners?

Benchmarking this $39.5 million sole-source award against similar contracts is challenging without access to a broader dataset of foreign military sales for comparable engine kits. Sole-source procurements inherently lack the price transparency provided by competitive bidding, making direct comparisons difficult. Factors such as the specific engine model, the number of kits procured, the scope of included components, and the urgency of the requirement can significantly influence pricing. While General Electric Company is a major supplier, the absence of competitive bids means this price cannot be definitively assessed as high or low relative to market alternatives without further, more detailed comparative data on similar international defense procurements.

What are the potential risks associated with awarding a contract of this magnitude on a sole-source basis, particularly for foreign military sales?

Awarding a contract of this magnitude ($39.5 million) on a sole-source basis for foreign military sales carries several risks. Primarily, there is a significant risk of overpayment, as the lack of competition prevents the government from obtaining the best possible price through a bidding process. This can lead to inefficient use of taxpayer funds, even if the funds are ultimately for a foreign partner. Another risk is the potential for a lack of urgency or innovation from the sole provider, as they face no competitive pressure to deliver efficiently or improve their offering. Furthermore, sole-source awards can create dependency on a single supplier, potentially limiting future options and flexibility. For foreign military sales, ensuring fair pricing and value is crucial for maintaining strong international partnerships and upholding U.S. foreign policy objectives.

Given the short contract duration (delivery order ending Dec 2017 from a Sep 2017 award), what does this imply about the urgency or nature of the requirement?

The very short contract duration, with an award in late September 2017 and a delivery end date in late December 2017 (approximately three months), strongly suggests a requirement for immediate or urgent fulfillment. This could indicate a critical operational need for the Egyptian Air Force, perhaps to address an unexpected maintenance issue, a sudden deployment, or to meet a specific, time-sensitive training or operational window. Alternatively, it might represent the final delivery order under a larger, pre-existing contract or agreement that is not fully detailed in this data snippet. The urgency implied by such a short timeframe can sometimes be a justification for sole-source awards, though it does not inherently guarantee fair pricing.

What is General Electric Company's track record with the Department of Defense, particularly concerning aircraft engine components and foreign military sales?

General Electric Company (GE) has a long-standing and extensive track record as a major contractor for the Department of Defense (DoD), particularly in the realm of aircraft engines and related components. GE is a primary supplier for numerous U.S. military aircraft platforms, including fighter jets, bombers, and transport planes. Their involvement in foreign military sales (FMS) is also substantial, as they provide engines and support packages to allied nations through U.S. government channels. Given their established position and the specialized nature of aerospace technology, GE is often a sole-source or prime contractor for specific engine types. While this expertise is valuable, it also means that many procurements, especially for unique or proprietary components like SLEP kits, may be sole-sourced due to the lack of alternative qualified suppliers.

Industry Classification

NAICS: ManufacturingAerospace Product and Parts ManufacturingAircraft Engine and Engine Parts Manufacturing

Product/Service Code: ENGINES AND TURBINES AND COMPONENT

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE

Solicitation ID: FA812216R0015

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 1 NEUMANN WAY, CINCINNATI, OH, 45215

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $39,522,598

Exercised Options: $39,522,598

Current Obligation: $39,522,598

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: YES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: FA812214G0001

IDV Type: BOA

Timeline

Start Date: 2017-09-20

Current End Date: 2017-12-29

Potential End Date: 2017-12-29 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2017-10-26

More Contracts from General Electric Company

View all General Electric Company federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending