DoD awards $23.5M contract for field team support, with Global Logistics Support Services Inc. as prime

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $23,541,695 ($23.5M)

Contractor: Global Logistics Support Services Inc

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2023-07-01

End Date: 2026-06-30

Contract Duration: 1,095 days

Daily Burn Rate: $21.5K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Number of Offers Received: 4

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Defense

Official Description: CONTRACT FIELD TEAM SUPPORT SERVICES

Place of Performance

Location: HUNTSVILLE, MADISON County, ALABAMA, 35806

State: Alabama Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $23.5 million to GLOBAL LOGISTICS SUPPORT SERVICES INC for work described as: CONTRACT FIELD TEAM SUPPORT SERVICES Key points: 1. Contract value of $23.5M over 3 years suggests a significant need for ongoing support services. 2. The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating a competitive bidding process. 3. The fixed-price contract type aims to control costs by setting a predetermined price. 4. The award to Global Logistics Support Services Inc. places them as a key provider in this domain. 5. The geographic focus on Alabama (AL) suggests localized operational requirements. 6. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 336411 points to aircraft manufacturing support.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $23.5M over 1095 days averages to approximately $21,499 per day. Benchmarking this against similar logistics support contracts is challenging without more specific service details. However, the total award amount appears reasonable for comprehensive field team support over a multi-year period, especially given the fixed-price nature which shifts some risk to the contractor.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under 'full and open competition after exclusion of sources,' which implies that while the competition was open, certain sources were initially excluded before the final award. The presence of 4 bidders indicates a degree of competition. The specific exclusion of sources warrants further investigation to understand its impact on the final price and overall fairness of the competition.

Taxpayer Impact: The full and open competition, despite initial exclusions, suggests that taxpayers likely benefited from a competitive pricing environment, leading to a more cost-effective outcome than a sole-source award.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are the Department of Defense field teams requiring logistical support. Services delivered likely encompass a range of operational and logistical assistance critical for mission success. The geographic impact is concentrated in Alabama, supporting operations within that state. Workforce implications may include the creation or sustainment of jobs related to logistics and support services in the Alabama region.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

The 'exclusion of sources' in the competition type requires clarification to ensure no potential bidders were unfairly disadvantaged.
Lack of detailed service descriptions makes it difficult to fully assess value for money and performance metrics.
The fixed-price contract type, while good for cost control, could lead to scope creep issues if not managed carefully.

Positive Signals

Awarded under full and open competition, indicating a robust selection process.
The fixed-price contract type provides cost certainty for the government.
The contract duration of 3 years allows for stable, long-term support.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the broader aerospace and defense sector, specifically related to aircraft manufacturing support services. The NAICS code 336411 indicates a focus on the manufacturing of aircraft, engines, and related parts. Spending in this area is critical for maintaining operational readiness and supporting complex defense systems. Comparable spending benchmarks would typically involve other large-scale logistics and support contracts within the Department of Defense, particularly those supporting aviation assets.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that small businesses were not a primary focus for this contract, as the 'small business set-aside' field is false. There is no explicit information on subcontracting plans for small businesses. This suggests that the prime contractor, Global Logistics Support Services Inc., will likely handle the majority of the work, with potential limited opportunities for small business participation unless proactively sought by the prime.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically fall under the purview of the Department of the Air Force contracting and program management offices. Accountability measures are inherent in the firm fixed-price structure, which incentivizes the contractor to meet performance standards within the agreed budget. Transparency is generally maintained through contract award databases, though detailed performance reports may be internal. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of fraud, waste, or abuse.

Related Government Programs

Aircraft Logistics Support
Field Operations Support
Defense Contractor Services
Aerospace Manufacturing Support
Global Logistics Services

Risk Flags

Potential for reduced competition due to source exclusion.
Scope definition clarity for fixed-price contract.
Contractor's past performance on similar services.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $23.5 million to GLOBAL LOGISTICS SUPPORT SERVICES INC. CONTRACT FIELD TEAM SUPPORT SERVICES

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is GLOBAL LOGISTICS SUPPORT SERVICES INC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Air Force).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $23.5 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2023-07-01. End: 2026-06-30.

What is the specific nature of the 'field team support services' being provided under this contract?

The provided data abbreviates the contract field as 'CONTRACT FIELD TEAM SUPPORT SERVICES' and lists the prime contractor as GLOBAL LOGISTICS SUPPORT SERVICES INC. While the NAICS code 336411 points towards aircraft manufacturing, the specific services are not detailed. Typically, 'field team support services' in a defense context can encompass a wide range of activities, including on-site technical assistance, maintenance coordination, equipment deployment and retrieval, logistical planning, and potentially administrative support for teams operating away from main bases. Given the aircraft manufacturing context, these services might be related to supporting teams involved in aircraft assembly, testing, modification, or field deployment operations.

How does the $23.5M contract value compare to similar logistics support contracts for the Air Force?

Comparing the $23.5M contract value requires context on the scope and duration of similar contracts. This contract is for 1095 days (3 years), making the average annual value approximately $7.85M. The Department of the Air Force procures numerous logistics and support services contracts annually, ranging from small, specialized services to large, comprehensive support packages. Without specific details on the services rendered (e.g., personnel, equipment, maintenance, transportation), a direct comparison is difficult. However, $7.85M annually for specialized field team support in a sector like aircraft manufacturing is within the expected range for significant, multi-year engagements, especially when considering the potential for specialized technical expertise and operational tempo.

What are the potential risks associated with a firm fixed-price contract for these services?

Firm fixed-price (FFP) contracts are generally favored for their cost control benefits, as the price is set regardless of the contractor's actual costs. However, for complex 'field team support services,' risks can emerge. If the scope of work is not precisely defined or if unforeseen operational challenges arise, the contractor may face financial strain if their costs exceed the fixed price. This could lead to pressure to cut corners on service quality or personnel, potentially impacting mission effectiveness. Conversely, if the contractor significantly underbids or the scope is less demanding than anticipated, they could realize substantial profit. The government's risk lies in ensuring the contractor has the capability and incentive to deliver the required level of service throughout the contract term.

What does the 'competition after exclusion of sources' detail imply for the bidding process and potential cost savings?

The phrase 'full and open competition after exclusion of sources' suggests a multi-stage procurement process. Initially, the solicitation may have been open to all, but certain potential offerors were excluded based on specific criteria (e.g., past performance, technical capabilities, or other pre-qualification requirements). Following this exclusion, the remaining pool of bidders competed under full and open conditions. While this aims to ensure a competitive environment among qualified entities, the exclusion of sources could potentially limit the number of bidders and, in some theoretical scenarios, reduce the downward pressure on pricing compared to a truly unrestricted competition. However, it also aims to ensure that only capable contractors participate, potentially leading to better overall value and reduced performance risk.

What is the track record of Global Logistics Support Services Inc. in performing similar government contracts?

Information on the specific track record of Global Logistics Support Services Inc. for similar government contracts is not detailed in the provided data. A comprehensive analysis would require accessing contract databases (like SAM.gov or FPDS) to review their past performance history, including contract awards, performance evaluations (e.g., CPARS), and any history of contract disputes or terminations. Their ability to secure a $23.5M contract suggests they have a demonstrated capacity to handle large-scale government requirements, but the quality and relevance of past performance in 'field team support services' would need further investigation to fully assess their reliability for this specific award.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Manufacturing › Aerospace Product and Parts Manufacturing › Aircraft Manufacturing

Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, REBUILD EQUIPMENT › MAINT, REPAIR, REBUILD OF EQUIPMENT

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Offers Received: 4

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 615 DISCOVERY DR, HUNTSVILLE, AL, 35806

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Small Business, Special Designations, Subchapter S Corporation, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $31,628,645

Exercised Options: $23,541,695

Current Obligation: $23,541,695

Contract Characteristics

Multi-Year Contract: Yes

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: YES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: FA810817D0002

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline