DoD's $32.6M Vehicle Operations Management Contract with Professional Contract Services, Inc. Lacks Competition
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $32,644,637 ($32.6M)
Contractor: Professional Contract Services, Inc.
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2017-04-28
End Date: 2022-01-31
Contract Duration: 1,739 days
Daily Burn Rate: $18.8K/day
Competition Type: NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Transportation
Official Description: IGF::OT::IGF VEHICLE OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT
Place of Performance
Location: OKLAHOMA CITY, OKLAHOMA County, OKLAHOMA, 73145
State: Oklahoma Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $32.6 million to PROFESSIONAL CONTRACT SERVICES, INC. for work described as: IGF::OT::IGF VEHICLE OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT Key points: 1. Significant spending of $32.6 million on vehicle operations management. 2. Contract awarded to Professional Contract Services, Inc. with no competition. 3. Potential risk due to lack of competitive bidding and fixed-price contract. 4. Services fall under 'Other Support Activities for Road Transportation'.
Value Assessment
Rating: questionable
The contract's value of $32.6 million is substantial. Without competitive pricing data, it's difficult to assess if this represents fair value. The firm fixed-price structure offers cost certainty but may limit savings if efficiencies are found.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: limited
The contract was not available for competition, indicating a limited source selection. This lack of competition raises concerns about price discovery and potentially higher costs for taxpayers.
Taxpayer Impact: The absence of competition may lead to inflated prices, resulting in a less efficient use of taxpayer funds.
Public Impact
Taxpayers may be overpaying for vehicle operations management due to the lack of competitive bidding. The Department of the Air Force relies on a single vendor for critical transportation support services. Long contract duration (2017-2022) without re-competition limits opportunities for cost savings and innovation.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Lack of competition
- Potential for overpricing
- Limited oversight on pricing effectiveness
Positive Signals
- Defined contract type (Firm Fixed Price)
- Clear agency and vendor identified
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the transportation sector, specifically road transportation support. Benchmarking against similar contracts is challenging due to the limited competition noted.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates this contract was not awarded to a small business, and there is no indication of subcontracting opportunities for small businesses within this award.
Oversight & Accountability
The contract's limited competition status suggests a need for enhanced oversight to ensure fair pricing and effective service delivery. Accountability for cost-effectiveness is reduced without competitive benchmarks.
Related Government Programs
- Other Support Activities for Road Transportation
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Department of the Air Force Programs
Risk Flags
- Lack of competitive bidding
- Potential for inflated pricing
- Limited transparency on justification for non-competition
- No small business participation evident
Tags
other-support-activities-for-road-transp, department-of-defense, ok, definitive-contract, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $32.6 million to PROFESSIONAL CONTRACT SERVICES, INC.. IGF::OT::IGF VEHICLE OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is PROFESSIONAL CONTRACT SERVICES, INC..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Air Force).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $32.6 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2017-04-28. End: 2022-01-31.
What was the justification for awarding this contract on a limited/non-competitive basis?
The provided data states the contract was 'NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION'. A thorough review would require accessing the contract file or agency justifications to understand the specific reasons, such as unique capabilities, urgent needs, or prior sole-source awards that were extended.
How can the Department of the Air Force ensure cost-effectiveness without competition?
The agency could implement robust performance metrics and conduct regular market research to establish independent cost estimates. Benchmarking against industry standards and potentially seeking competitive proposals for future contract renewals are crucial steps to ensure value for taxpayer money.
What are the risks associated with a long-term, non-competitive contract for vehicle operations?
The primary risks include potential cost escalation over time, reduced incentive for the contractor to innovate or improve efficiency, and a lack of exposure to new technologies or service providers. This can lead to suboptimal service quality and higher overall expenditure.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Transportation and Warehousing › Support Activities for Road Transportation › Other Support Activities for Road Transportation
Product/Service Code: TRANSPORT, TRAVEL, RELOCATION › TRAVEL, LODGING, RECRUITMENT SVCS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE
Solicitation ID: FA810117R0010
Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 718 W FM 1626, AUSTIN, TX, 78748
Business Categories: AbilityOne Program Participant, Category Business, Corporate Entity Tax Exempt, Nonprofit Organization, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $35,769,498
Exercised Options: $35,311,494
Current Obligation: $32,644,637
Actual Outlays: $1,262,646
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Timeline
Start Date: 2017-04-28
Current End Date: 2022-01-31
Potential End Date: 2022-01-31 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2021-12-10
More Contracts from Professional Contract Services, Inc.
- - Fort Sill DPW Facilities Maintenance Services — $155.8M (Department of Defense)
- 0001 Phase in — $149.6M (Department of Defense)
- Facility Maintenance Vertical — $78.3M (Department of Defense)
- FT. Knox Base Operation Support Services — $50.0M (Department of Defense)
- Base Operations and Maintenance Service Contract. Base Period — $46.9M (Department of Defense)
View all Professional Contract Services, Inc. federal contracts →
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)