KBR WYLE SERVICES awarded $40.7M for Naval Air Systems Command technical training product development
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $40,722,588 ($40.7M)
Contractor: KBR Wyle Services, LLC
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2020-05-01
End Date: 2025-04-30
Contract Duration: 1,825 days
Daily Burn Rate: $22.3K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE
Sector: R&D
Official Description: TECHNICAL TRAINING PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT FOR THE NAVAL AIR SYSTEMS COMMAND
Place of Performance
Location: ORANGE PARK, CLAY County, FLORIDA, 32073
State: Florida Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $40.7 million to KBR WYLE SERVICES, LLC for work described as: TECHNICAL TRAINING PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT FOR THE NAVAL AIR SYSTEMS COMMAND Key points: 1. Contract value represents a significant investment in advanced training solutions. 2. Competition dynamics suggest a potentially competitive bidding process for this requirement. 3. Performance period of five years indicates a long-term need for these services. 4. The contract falls within the Research and Development sector, focusing on physical and engineering sciences. 5. Geographic location in Florida may indicate specific training facility or operational needs.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract value of $40.7 million over five years for technical training product development appears reasonable given the scope. Benchmarking against similar R&D contracts for specialized training systems is challenging without more specific service details. However, the fixed-fee component suggests a degree of cost control. Further analysis would require comparing the deliverables and complexity to other training development contracts within the defense sector.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. The presence of multiple bidders, though not explicitly stated, is implied by the competition type. This approach generally fosters price discovery and encourages contractors to offer competitive pricing to secure the award.
Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition is favorable for taxpayers as it is expected to yield the best value through a competitive bidding process, potentially leading to lower overall costs.
Public Impact
Naval Air Systems Command personnel will benefit from enhanced technical training products. The services delivered will support the development of advanced training methodologies and materials. The primary geographic impact is expected to be in Florida, where the contractor is located. This contract supports a specialized workforce within the defense R&D sector.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Potential for scope creep in R&D projects if requirements are not clearly defined.
- Reliance on a single contractor for a significant period could limit future innovation if not managed effectively.
Positive Signals
- Awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a robust selection process.
- Long-term contract duration provides stability for developing and implementing complex training solutions.
- Focus on product development implies tangible outputs that can be evaluated for effectiveness.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the Research and Development sector, specifically NAICS code 541715, which covers R&D in physical, engineering, and life sciences. The defense industry heavily invests in R&D for advanced training and simulation technologies to maintain a technological edge. Comparable spending in this area can vary widely based on the complexity and novelty of the research, but significant government contracts are common for developing specialized training products for complex systems like those operated by the Naval Air Systems Command.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). As a large contract awarded under full and open competition, there may be opportunities for small businesses to participate as subcontractors to KBR WYLE SERVICES. However, the primary award does not directly benefit small businesses through set-asides.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract will likely be managed by the Naval Air Systems Command, with potential involvement from the Department of Defense's Inspector General for audits and investigations. The Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) contract type requires careful monitoring of costs and performance to ensure value for money. Transparency is expected through contract reporting mechanisms and performance reviews.
Related Government Programs
- Naval Air Systems Command Training Programs
- Defense Research and Development Contracts
- Technical Training Systems
- Simulation and Modeling Services
Risk Flags
- Cost Overruns Risk
- Scope Creep Potential
- Technical Feasibility Uncertainty
Tags
research-and-development, department-of-defense, naval-air-systems-command, full-and-open-competition, cost-plus-fixed-fee, technical-training, product-development, florida, large-contract
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $40.7 million to KBR WYLE SERVICES, LLC. TECHNICAL TRAINING PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT FOR THE NAVAL AIR SYSTEMS COMMAND
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is KBR WYLE SERVICES, LLC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Air Force).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $40.7 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2020-05-01. End: 2025-04-30.
What is the track record of KBR WYLE SERVICES in delivering similar technical training products for the Department of Defense?
KBR WYLE SERVICES, LLC has a substantial history of performing complex technical services for the Department of Defense, including research, development, and sustainment support. While specific details on 'technical training product development' for naval aviation are not provided in this summary, the company's broader portfolio often includes engineering, scientific, and technical support across various defense platforms. Their experience in R&D and systems integration suggests a capacity to handle such requirements. A deeper dive into their past performance on similar contracts, particularly those involving product development and training systems, would be necessary to fully assess their suitability and past success rates in this specific niche.
How does the $40.7 million contract value compare to similar R&D contracts for training product development within the defense sector?
The $40.7 million value for a five-year contract focused on technical training product development for naval aviation is within a common range for specialized defense R&D efforts. However, direct comparisons are difficult without knowing the exact scope, complexity, and deliverables. Contracts for developing advanced simulation systems, virtual reality training environments, or highly technical instructional materials can vary significantly. Generally, R&D contracts in the defense sector can range from a few million to hundreds of millions of dollars, depending on the technological advancement and scale. This contract appears to be a mid-to-large size for a specific product development effort within a broader training modernization initiative.
What are the primary risks associated with this Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) contract type for R&D?
The primary risks associated with a CPFF contract for R&D, like this one, revolve around cost control and defining the scope. While the fixed fee provides the contractor with a defined profit margin, the 'cost plus' element means the government reimburses allowable costs. If costs escalate beyond initial projections due to unforeseen technical challenges or scope creep, the government bears the financial burden. For R&D, where innovation and discovery are key, defining the exact scope and deliverables upfront can be challenging, increasing the risk of cost overruns. Effective oversight and clear communication are crucial to mitigate these risks and ensure the project stays within budget and meets objectives.
How effective is the 'full and open competition' approach likely to be in ensuring value for money for this specific training product development?
The 'full and open competition' approach is generally considered the most effective method for ensuring value for money, as it allows the widest possible pool of qualified contractors to bid. This competition drives down prices and encourages innovation as companies strive to differentiate their offerings. For a technical training product development contract, this means the Naval Air Systems Command likely received multiple proposals addressing the requirement. The agency can then evaluate these proposals not only on price but also on technical merit, past performance, and overall value. While effective, the government must still conduct thorough evaluations to ensure the lowest price doesn't compromise quality or essential capabilities.
What are the historical spending patterns for technical training product development by the Naval Air Systems Command?
Historical spending patterns for technical training product development by the Naval Air Systems Command typically reflect the evolving needs of naval aviation technology and operational requirements. This includes investments in simulation, virtual and augmented reality training, computer-based training modules, and curriculum development for new aircraft and systems. Spending can fluctuate based on modernization cycles, budget allocations, and the introduction of new platforms. While specific aggregate historical data for 'product development' is not provided here, it's understood that the Navy consistently allocates significant resources to ensure its aircrews and maintenance personnel are proficient with the latest technologies and procedures. This $40.7M contract aligns with that ongoing commitment.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Scientific Research and Development Services › Research and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences (except Nanotechnology and Biotechnology)
Product/Service Code: RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT › OTHER RESEARCH/DEVELOPMENT
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY
Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE (U)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: Brown & Root Industrial Services Holdings, LLC
Address: 22309 EXPLORATION DR, LEXINGTON PARK, MD, 20653
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $42,570,641
Exercised Options: $42,570,641
Current Obligation: $40,722,588
Actual Outlays: $1,818,489
Subaward Activity
Number of Subawards: 8
Total Subaward Amount: $2,856,478
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: FA807518D0015
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2020-05-01
Current End Date: 2025-04-30
Potential End Date: 2025-04-30 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2025-12-10
More Contracts from KBR Wyle Services, LLC
- Bioastronautics Contract-Activities for the Health &productivity of Crews Working and Living in Space — $1.5B (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- Fpds-Ng Mission Systems Operations Contract (msoc) — $1.0B (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- THE Purpose of This Contract IS to Acquire Engineering Services and Related Services to MSD and Related Organizations Throughout Gsfc, AS Required, for the Formulation, Design, Development, Fabrication, Integration, Testing, Verification, and Operations of Space Flight and Ground System Hardware and Software, Including Development and Validation of NEW Technologies to Enable Future Space and Science Missions. the Engineering Areas of Emphasis ARE Multidisciplinary With Concentration in the Mechanical Engineering Areas of Materials, Structural Analysis and Loads, Mechanical Design, Electromechanical Design, Thermal, Contamination and Coatings, Manufacturing and Integration and Test — $728.5M (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- 200106!000121!1700!F7004 !marine Corps Logistics Base !M6700499C0002 !a!n!*!n!p00015 !20010228!20080930!041014242!041014242!139691877!n!honeywell Technology Solutions!7000 Columbia Gateway Driv!columbia !md!21046!35000!031!12!jacksonville !duval !florida !+000004292865!n!n!000000000000!j049!maint & Repair of Eq/Maintenance & Repair Shop EQ !a4a!combat Vehicles !2000!NOT Discernable or Classified !811310!*!*!3! ! !C!*!*!*!B!*!*!A! !A !N!J!2!006!B! !C!Y!Z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!d!n! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! — $670.1M (Department of Defense)
- Mission Operations Management Services (moms) — $623.8M (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)