DoD's $32M Naval Aviation IT Data Warehouse Contract Awarded to KBR Wyle Services

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $32,006,171 ($32.0M)

Contractor: KBR Wyle Services, LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2017-07-24

End Date: 2022-07-23

Contract Duration: 1,825 days

Daily Burn Rate: $17.5K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE

Sector: IT

Official Description: IGF::OT::IGF NAVAL AVIATION LOGISTICS INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (IT) SOLUTIONS NAVAL AIR SYSTEMS COMMAND AVIATION READINESS AND RESOURCE ANALYSIS DEPARTMENT (NAVAIR 6.8.4) DATA WAREHOUSE&DECISION ANALYSIS SUPPORT (DW&DAS)

Place of Performance

Location: PATUXENT RIVER, SAINT MARYS County, MARYLAND, 20670

State: Maryland Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $32.0 million to KBR WYLE SERVICES, LLC for work described as: IGF::OT::IGF NAVAL AVIATION LOGISTICS INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (IT) SOLUTIONS NAVAL AIR SYSTEMS COMMAND AVIATION READINESS AND RESOURCE ANALYSIS DEPARTMENT (NAVAIR 6.8.4) DATA WAREHOUSE&DECISION ANALYSIS SUPPORT (DW&DAS) Key points: 1. Contract supports critical aviation readiness and analysis for the Navy. 2. KBR Wyle Services, a large business, secured the award. 3. The contract falls under R&D in Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences. 4. Full and open competition was utilized, suggesting a competitive bidding process.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $32M over 5 years appears reasonable for a specialized IT data warehouse and decision analysis support system for naval aviation. Benchmarking against similar large-scale R&D IT contracts would provide further context.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that multiple bidders had the opportunity to compete. This method generally promotes competitive pricing and ensures the government receives the best value.

Taxpayer Impact: The use of full and open competition is positive for taxpayers, as it aims to secure competitive pricing and efficient use of funds for essential defense IT services.

Public Impact

Enhances naval aviation readiness through advanced data analytics. Supports critical decision-making for the Naval Air Systems Command. Provides a centralized data warehouse for aviation logistics information. Potential for improved operational efficiency and cost savings in aviation maintenance.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

  • Contract duration of 5 years may require re-evaluation for evolving IT needs.
  • Cost Plus Fixed Fee contract type can incentivize cost overruns if not managed carefully.

Positive Signals

  • Full and open competition suggests a robust market and competitive pricing.
  • Supports a critical function for naval aviation readiness.
  • Long-term contract provides stability for essential services.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the IT and Research & Development sectors, specifically focusing on data warehousing and decision analysis for physical and engineering sciences. Spending in this area is crucial for modernizing defense capabilities and ensuring operational effectiveness.

Small Business Impact

The contract was awarded to KBR Wyle Services, LLC, a large business. There is no indication of small business participation or subcontracting in the provided data, which is a missed opportunity for small business engagement.

Oversight & Accountability

The Department of Defense, specifically NAVAIR, is responsible for oversight. The contract type and duration necessitate diligent monitoring to ensure performance, cost control, and adherence to requirements to maintain accountability.

Related Government Programs

  • Research and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences (except Biotechnology)
  • Department of Defense Contracting
  • Department of the Air Force Programs

Risk Flags

  • Contract duration may lead to outdated technology if not managed.
  • CPFF contract type requires stringent cost monitoring.
  • Lack of explicit small business participation.
  • Dependence on a single large contractor for critical IT infrastructure.

Tags

research-and-development-in-the-physical, department-of-defense, md, delivery-order, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $32.0 million to KBR WYLE SERVICES, LLC. IGF::OT::IGF NAVAL AVIATION LOGISTICS INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (IT) SOLUTIONS NAVAL AIR SYSTEMS COMMAND AVIATION READINESS AND RESOURCE ANALYSIS DEPARTMENT (NAVAIR 6.8.4) DATA WAREHOUSE&DECISION ANALYSIS SUPPORT (DW&DAS)

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is KBR WYLE SERVICES, LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Air Force).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $32.0 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2017-07-24. End: 2022-07-23.

What specific performance metrics are in place to measure the effectiveness of the data warehouse and decision analysis support?

The provided data does not detail specific performance metrics. Effective oversight would require clearly defined KPIs related to data accuracy, system uptime, query response times, and the impact of analyses on readiness and resource allocation decisions. Regular performance reviews are essential to ensure the system meets its objectives and provides tangible value.

How does the Cost Plus Fixed Fee structure mitigate risks of cost overruns for this R&D IT project?

A Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) contract allows the contractor to recover allowable costs plus a predetermined fixed fee. While it provides flexibility for R&D, it carries a risk of cost overruns if the scope is not well-defined or if unforeseen technical challenges arise. Robust government oversight, detailed cost tracking, and clear change management processes are critical to controlling costs and ensuring the fixed fee remains appropriate.

What is the long-term strategy for updating and maintaining this data warehouse given the rapid evolution of IT?

The 5-year duration suggests a need for a forward-looking strategy. The government should plan for potential contract modifications, follow-on contracts, or technology refresh initiatives to ensure the data warehouse remains current and capable of handling new data sources and analytical techniques. Proactive planning for technological obsolescence is key to sustained effectiveness.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical ServicesScientific Research and Development ServicesResearch and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences (except Biotechnology)

Product/Service Code: RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENTOTHER RESEARCH/DEVELOPMENT

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: FA807515R0001

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE (U)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: KBR, Inc.

Address: 345 BOB HEATH DR, HUNTSVILLE, AL, 35806

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $43,811,672

Exercised Options: $43,811,672

Current Obligation: $32,006,171

Actual Outlays: $5,150,936

Subaward Activity

Number of Subawards: 11

Total Subaward Amount: $36,114,017

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: FA807516D0010

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2017-07-24

Current End Date: 2022-07-23

Potential End Date: 2022-07-23 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2024-04-16

More Contracts from KBR Wyle Services, LLC

View all KBR Wyle Services, LLC federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending