DoD's $31M Naval Aviation Logistics IT Contract with KBR Wyle Faces Scrutiny for R&D Spending

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $30,956,719 ($31.0M)

Contractor: KBR Wyle Services, LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2017-03-16

End Date: 2022-03-19

Contract Duration: 1,829 days

Daily Burn Rate: $16.9K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE

Sector: R&D

Official Description: IGF::OT::IGF NAVAL AVIATION LOGISTICS IT SOLUTIONS NAVAL AIR SYSTEMS COMMAND AVIATION READINESS AND RESOURCE ANALYSIS DEPARTMENT (NAVAIR 6.8.4) TACTICAL MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION

Place of Performance

Location: PATUXENT RIVER, SAINT MARYS County, MARYLAND, 20670

State: Maryland Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $31.0 million to KBR WYLE SERVICES, LLC for work described as: IGF::OT::IGF NAVAL AVIATION LOGISTICS IT SOLUTIONS NAVAL AIR SYSTEMS COMMAND AVIATION READINESS AND RESOURCE ANALYSIS DEPARTMENT (NAVAIR 6.8.4) TACTICAL MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION Key points: 1. Contract awarded to KBR Wyle Services, LLC for IT solutions in naval aviation logistics. 2. Significant portion of spending allocated to Research and Development in Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences. 3. Full and open competition was utilized, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 4. Contract duration spans over five years, indicating a long-term commitment. 5. The contract's primary focus is on tactical maintenance and operations support.

Value Assessment

Rating: questionable

The contract's Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) structure, while common for R&D, can lead to cost overruns if not managed tightly. Benchmarking CPFF contracts in R&D is challenging due to inherent variability.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The use of full and open competition is positive for price discovery. However, the CPFF pricing structure may limit the direct impact of competition on final cost savings.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayer funds are committed to a long-term R&D effort. Oversight is crucial to ensure value for money and prevent unnecessary cost escalation.

Public Impact

Impacts naval aviation readiness and tactical maintenance operations. Supports research and development in critical physical and engineering sciences. Funds a significant IT services contract within the Department of Defense. Potential for technological advancements in aviation logistics and maintenance.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

  • Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) pricing can incentivize higher spending.
  • R&D contracts are inherently complex and prone to scope creep.
  • Long contract duration may mask inefficiencies over time.
  • Lack of specific performance metrics makes value assessment difficult.

Positive Signals

  • Full and open competition utilized.
  • Supports critical naval aviation readiness.
  • Focus on R&D may yield technological advancements.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls under the Research and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences sector, specifically related to IT solutions for naval aviation. Spending benchmarks for R&D can vary widely based on the specific technological advancements sought.

Small Business Impact

The data does not indicate any specific set-asides for small businesses. The prime contractor, KBR Wyle Services, LLC, is a large business, suggesting limited direct opportunities for small businesses unless through subcontracting.

Oversight & Accountability

The contract is managed by NAVAL AIR SYSTEMS COMMAND (NAVAIR). Oversight effectiveness will depend on rigorous monitoring of cost, performance, and adherence to R&D objectives under the CPFF structure.

Related Government Programs

  • Research and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences (except Biotechnology)
  • Department of Defense Contracting
  • Department of the Air Force Programs

Risk Flags

  • Potential for cost overruns due to CPFF structure.
  • Difficulty in benchmarking R&D contract costs.
  • Lack of specific performance metrics.
  • Long contract duration may obscure long-term value.
  • Limited visibility into subcontracting opportunities for small businesses.

Tags

research-and-development-in-the-physical, department-of-defense, md, delivery-order, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $31.0 million to KBR WYLE SERVICES, LLC. IGF::OT::IGF NAVAL AVIATION LOGISTICS IT SOLUTIONS NAVAL AIR SYSTEMS COMMAND AVIATION READINESS AND RESOURCE ANALYSIS DEPARTMENT (NAVAIR 6.8.4) TACTICAL MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is KBR WYLE SERVICES, LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Air Force).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $31.0 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2017-03-16. End: 2022-03-19.

How effectively is the CPFF structure being managed to ensure cost efficiency in this R&D contract?

The effectiveness of CPFF management hinges on robust oversight by NAVAIR. This includes detailed cost tracking, regular performance reviews, and strict change control processes to prevent scope creep and ensure that the fixed fee remains appropriate for the effort. Without transparent reporting and proactive risk mitigation, CPFF contracts can lead to cost overruns, diminishing the overall value delivered to taxpayers.

What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) used to measure the success of this R&D effort?

Specific KPIs for this R&D contract are not detailed in the provided data. Typically, R&D KPIs might include milestones for technological development, successful prototype testing, integration into existing systems, or achievement of specific performance improvements. The absence of clearly defined and measurable KPIs makes it challenging to objectively assess the contract's success and the return on investment for the government.

To what extent does this contract contribute to tangible improvements in naval aviation readiness and tactical maintenance?

The contract's stated purpose is to support aviation readiness and tactical maintenance through IT solutions and R&D. The tangible impact depends on the successful development and implementation of the technologies or processes resulting from the R&D. Without specific project outcomes or post-implementation reviews, it's difficult to quantify the direct contribution to readiness improvements beyond the contract's intended scope.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical ServicesScientific Research and Development ServicesResearch and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences (except Biotechnology)

Product/Service Code: RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENTOTHER RESEARCH/DEVELOPMENT

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: FA807515R0001

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE (U)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 345 BOB HEATH DR, HUNTSVILLE, AL, 35806

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $31,163,604

Exercised Options: $31,163,604

Current Obligation: $30,956,719

Subaward Activity

Number of Subawards: 1

Total Subaward Amount: $2,523,710

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: FA807516D0010

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2017-03-16

Current End Date: 2022-03-19

Potential End Date: 2022-03-19 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2025-04-26

More Contracts from KBR Wyle Services, LLC

View all KBR Wyle Services, LLC federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending