Air Force awards $28.1M contract for Vandenberg Hall renovation, highlighting construction sector activity

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $28,142,338 ($28.1M)

Contractor: G. E. Johnson Construction CO, Inc

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2011-09-27

End Date: 2013-02-08

Contract Duration: 500 days

Daily Burn Rate: $56.3K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 6

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Construction

Official Description: RENOVATE VANDENBERG HALL - CS #7&#8

Place of Performance

Location: USAF ACADEMY, EL PASO County, COLORADO, 80840

State: Colorado Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $28.1 million to G. E. JOHNSON CONSTRUCTION CO, INC for work described as: RENOVATE VANDENBERG HALL - CS #7&#8 Key points: 1. Contract value represents a significant investment in facility upgrades. 2. Competition dynamics suggest a potentially competitive bidding environment for this project. 3. Fixed-price contract type aims to control costs and manage financial risk. 4. Project duration indicates a substantial timeline for completion. 5. Geographic location in Colorado places the project within a specific regional construction market.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $28.1 million for renovating Vandenberg Hall appears reasonable for a project of this scope, involving commercial and institutional building construction. Benchmarking against similar large-scale renovation projects within the Department of Defense or other federal agencies would provide a more precise value-for-money assessment. The firm fixed-price structure suggests an effort to establish cost certainty, which is generally positive for taxpayer value, assuming the initial pricing was competitive.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. The presence of 6 bidders suggests a healthy level of competition for this construction project. A higher number of bidders generally leads to more competitive pricing and a greater likelihood of selecting the best value proposal for the government.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition with multiple bidders typically results in better pricing for taxpayers by driving down costs through competitive pressures.

Public Impact

Military personnel stationed at Vandenberg Air Force Base will benefit from improved living and working facilities. The project delivers essential renovation and construction services to maintain and upgrade critical infrastructure. The geographic impact is localized to Vandenberg Air Force Base in Colorado. The project supports the construction workforce, including skilled trades and project management professionals.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for cost overruns if unforeseen issues arise during renovation.
Delays in construction could impact facility availability and operational readiness.

Positive Signals

Firm fixed-price contract helps mitigate cost escalation risks.
Full and open competition suggests a strong initial pricing evaluation.
Experienced contractor likely selected through a competitive process.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Commercial and Institutional Building Construction sector, a significant segment of the broader construction industry. Federal spending in this area supports infrastructure development and maintenance across various government agencies. Comparable spending benchmarks would involve analyzing other large-scale renovation or new construction contracts awarded by the Department of Defense or other federal entities for similar types of facilities.

Small Business Impact

The contract was awarded to G. E. Johnson Construction Co, Inc. and does not indicate any specific small business set-aside provisions. While the prime contractor is not a small business, there may be subcontracting opportunities for small businesses within the construction trades, though this is not explicitly detailed in the provided data.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the contracting officer and the relevant Department of the Air Force contracting office. Performance monitoring and quality assurance would be conducted throughout the project lifecycle. Transparency is generally maintained through contract award databases and reporting mechanisms, though specific oversight details are not provided.

Related Government Programs

Military Housing Construction
Base Infrastructure Modernization
Department of Defense Facilities Maintenance
Federal Building Construction Contracts

Risk Flags

Potential for scope creep if additional renovation needs are identified post-award.
Reliance on a single prime contractor for a large project requires diligent oversight.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $28.1 million to G. E. JOHNSON CONSTRUCTION CO, INC. RENOVATE VANDENBERG HALL - CS #7&#8

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is G. E. JOHNSON CONSTRUCTION CO, INC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Air Force).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $28.1 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2011-09-27. End: 2013-02-08.

What is the track record of G. E. Johnson Construction Co, Inc. with federal contracts, particularly within the Department of Defense?

G. E. Johnson Construction Co, Inc. has a history of performing federal construction contracts. While specific details on their track record with the Department of Defense are not fully elaborated in this data snippet, their selection for a contract of this magnitude suggests they possess the necessary qualifications and experience. A deeper dive into their past performance ratings, previous contract values, and types of projects completed for the DoD would offer a more comprehensive understanding of their reliability and expertise in handling similar federal construction endeavors.

How does the awarded amount compare to the estimated cost or budget for this renovation project?

The provided data indicates the awarded amount is $28,142,338.21. However, it does not include the initial estimated cost or the allocated budget for the Vandenberg Hall renovation. Without this information, a direct comparison to assess if the contract was awarded significantly above, below, or within the expected range is not possible. Understanding the initial budget would be crucial for evaluating the efficiency of the procurement process and the competitiveness of the final award price.

What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) used to measure the success of this renovation contract?

Key performance indicators for this renovation contract would likely include adherence to the project schedule (dur: 500 days), quality of construction meeting specified standards, adherence to the firm fixed price, and overall safety performance on site. The government would monitor progress through regular site inspections, progress reports from the contractor, and potentially milestone-based payments. Successful completion would be defined by the timely delivery of a renovated facility that meets all functional and safety requirements outlined in the contract.

What is the historical spending pattern for facility renovations at Vandenberg Air Force Base?

The provided data focuses on a single contract award for the renovation of Vandenberg Hall. It does not offer historical spending patterns for facility renovations at Vandenberg Air Force Base. To analyze historical spending, one would need to access contract databases and search for all renovation and construction contracts awarded to the base over a period of several years. This would allow for an assessment of trends, average project costs, and the frequency of such investments in base infrastructure.

What are the potential risks associated with a firm fixed-price contract for a large-scale construction project like this?

While firm fixed-price contracts are designed to control costs, they can introduce risks for the contractor if unforeseen issues arise during construction, such as unexpected site conditions or material price fluctuations. If the contractor underestimated costs or encounters significant problems, they may incur losses. For the government, the primary risk is that the contractor might cut corners on quality to maintain profitability, although robust oversight mechanisms are intended to prevent this. The government's main advantage is cost certainty, provided the initial bid was competitive.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Construction › Nonresidential Building Construction › Commercial and Institutional Building Construction

Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCT OF STRUCTURES/FACILITIES › CONSTRUCT NONBUILDING FACILITIES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Solicitation ID: FA700011R0021

Offers Received: 6

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 25 N CASCADE AVE #400, COLORADO SPRINGS, CO, 05

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $28,142,338

Exercised Options: $28,142,338

Current Obligation: $28,142,338

Contract Characteristics

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Timeline