Air Force's $14M Communication Support Services contract awarded to Rohmann Joint Venture, LLC
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $14,012,281 ($14.0M)
Contractor: Rohmann Joint Venture, LLC
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2007-12-01
End Date: 2013-03-31
Contract Duration: 1,947 days
Daily Burn Rate: $7.2K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Number of Offers Received: 3
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Other
Official Description: USAFA COMMUNICATION SUPPORT SERVICES TAS::57 3400::TAS
Place of Performance
Location: USAF ACADEMY, EL PASO County, COLORADO, 80840, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
State: Colorado Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $14.0 million to ROHMANN JOINT VENTURE, LLC for work described as: USAFA COMMUNICATION SUPPORT SERVICES TAS::57 3400::TAS Key points: 1. The contract value of $14.01 million over its duration suggests a moderate investment in communication support. 2. Awarded under full and open competition, this indicates a competitive bidding process was utilized. 3. The contract duration of 1947 days (approximately 5.3 years) implies a need for sustained communication services. 4. The fixed-price contract type aims to control costs by establishing a set price for services. 5. The 'CO' award type suggests a contract modification or a specific type of award action. 6. The small business set-aside flag is false, indicating no specific preference for small businesses in this award.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract value of approximately $14 million for communication support services over five years appears to be within a reasonable range for such services, though specific benchmarks are unavailable without more detailed service descriptions. The firm fixed-price nature of the contract suggests an effort to manage costs predictably. However, without comparable contract data or detailed performance metrics, a definitive assessment of value for money is challenging. The award to Rohmann Joint Venture, LLC, requires further scrutiny regarding their performance history and pricing competitiveness against market rates.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES,' indicating that the opportunity was broadly advertised, but specific sources were excluded prior to the final competition. This suggests a competitive process, but the exclusion of certain sources might limit the full breadth of potential bidders. The presence of 3 bidders indicates some level of competition, which is generally positive for price discovery. However, the exact reasons for source exclusion and the impact on the final price are not detailed.
Taxpayer Impact: The use of full and open competition, even with exclusions, generally benefits taxpayers by encouraging multiple vendors to bid, potentially driving down prices. The fact that there were multiple bidders suggests that the government received competitive offers, which is a positive sign for cost efficiency.
Public Impact
The primary beneficiaries are likely the Department of the Air Force personnel and operations requiring communication support services. The services delivered are essential for maintaining operational communication capabilities within the Air Force. The geographic impact is likely concentrated around the Air Force facilities where these communication services are deployed. The contract supports the workforce involved in providing and managing these communication services.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Lack of detailed performance metrics makes it difficult to assess the effectiveness and efficiency of the services provided.
- The 'exclusion of sources' in the competition process raises questions about the extent of competition and potential impact on pricing.
- Limited information on the specific nature of 'communication support services' hinders a thorough value-for-money assessment.
Positive Signals
- Awarded under full and open competition, indicating a structured and potentially competitive bidding process.
- The firm fixed-price contract type provides cost certainty for the government.
- The contract duration suggests a stable, long-term need for these services, implying a recognized requirement.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the Facilities Support Services sector, which encompasses a broad range of services necessary for the operation and maintenance of facilities. The IT and communication infrastructure are critical components of modern facility management, especially for a large organization like the Department of Defense. Spending in this sector can vary significantly based on the size and complexity of the facilities, with government contracts often representing a substantial portion of the market. Benchmarking requires comparison to similar support service contracts within the federal government or large private sector organizations.
Small Business Impact
The contract was not set aside for small businesses, as indicated by 'sb: false'. This means that both large and small businesses were eligible to compete. There is no explicit information provided regarding subcontracting plans or requirements for small business participation. Therefore, the direct impact on the small business ecosystem is likely minimal unless the prime contractor voluntarily includes small businesses in their supply chain.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the contracting officer and the relevant contracting office within the Department of the Air Force. Performance monitoring and quality assurance would be key oversight mechanisms. Transparency is facilitated by contract databases like FPDS, which provide basic award information. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse were suspected.
Related Government Programs
- Facilities Support Services
- Communication Services
- Information Technology Support
- Defense Communications Infrastructure
Risk Flags
- Potential for cost overruns if scope creep occurs, despite fixed-price nature.
- Risk associated with the 'exclusion of sources' in the competitive process.
- Dependence on contractor performance for critical communication functions.
- Lack of detailed performance metrics in the provided data hinders risk assessment.
Tags
defense, department-of-defense, department-of-the-air-force, facilities-support-services, communication-support, full-and-open-competition, firm-fixed-price, rohmnn-joint-venture-llc, colorado, contract-modification, large-contract
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $14.0 million to ROHMANN JOINT VENTURE, LLC. USAFA COMMUNICATION SUPPORT SERVICES TAS::57 3400::TAS
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is ROHMANN JOINT VENTURE, LLC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Air Force).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $14.0 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2007-12-01. End: 2013-03-31.
What is the specific nature of the 'communication support services' provided under this contract?
The provided data indicates the contract falls under NAICS code 561210, Facilities Support Services. While 'communication support services' is mentioned, the specific details of these services are not elaborated in the provided data. This could range from managing internal communication networks, providing telecommunications infrastructure maintenance, supporting audio-visual communication systems, to potentially managing external communication links. Without a more detailed statement of work or service description, it is difficult to ascertain the precise nature and scope of the support. Understanding the specifics is crucial for evaluating performance, cost-effectiveness, and potential risks associated with the contract.
How does the awarded price of approximately $14 million compare to market rates for similar communication support services?
A direct comparison of the $14.01 million contract value to market rates for similar communication support services is challenging without more granular data. The contract duration of nearly five years (1947 days) means the average annual value is roughly $2.8 million. The effectiveness of this pricing depends heavily on the scope, complexity, and geographic distribution of the services required by the Air Force. Factors such as the level of technical expertise needed, security requirements, and the specific technologies involved would influence market rates. Benchmarking would ideally involve comparing this contract to other federal or commercial contracts for analogous services, considering the number of users supported, the criticality of the systems, and the service level agreements in place. The firm fixed-price nature suggests an attempt to lock in a price, but its competitiveness relies on the initial negotiation and the bidding environment.
What is Rohmann Joint Venture, LLC's track record with similar government contracts?
Information regarding Rohmann Joint Venture, LLC's specific track record with similar government contracts is not detailed in the provided data. To assess their performance history, one would need to examine past contract awards, performance evaluations (such as Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System - CPARS), and any history of contract disputes or terminations. A joint venture structure can sometimes indicate a collaboration to bring specific expertise or capacity to a contract. Understanding their experience in providing communication support services, particularly to the Department of Defense or other large federal agencies, is crucial for evaluating their capability to successfully execute this contract and manage associated risks.
What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) used to measure the success of this communication support contract?
The provided data does not specify the key performance indicators (KPIs) used to measure the success of this communication support contract. Typically, for such services, KPIs might include communication uptime/availability, response times for service requests, resolution times for issues, customer satisfaction ratings, adherence to security protocols, and successful completion of service level agreements (SLAs). The effectiveness of the contract is directly tied to how well these, or similar, metrics are defined, monitored, and enforced by the contracting officer's representative (COR). Without defined KPIs, assessing the contractor's performance and the overall value derived from the contract becomes subjective and difficult.
How has spending on communication support services by the Department of the Air Force evolved over time?
The provided data focuses on a single contract award and does not offer historical spending trends for communication support services by the Department of the Air Force. To analyze spending evolution, one would need access to historical contract data over multiple fiscal years, identifying all contracts related to communication support, their values, and the contractors involved. This would allow for the identification of patterns, such as increases or decreases in spending, shifts in awarded contract types (e.g., from cost-plus to fixed-price), changes in competition levels, and the emergence of new service providers. Such analysis is essential for understanding budget allocation, identifying potential efficiencies, and forecasting future needs.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Facilities Support Services › Facilities Support Services
Product/Service Code: OPERATION OF GOVT OWNED FACILITY › OPERATE GOVT OWNED BUILDINGS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Solicitation ID: FA700007R0011
Offers Received: 3
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 2349 S WW WHITE RD, SAN ANTONIO, TX, 78222
Business Categories: Category Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $14,458,777
Exercised Options: $14,448,777
Current Obligation: $14,012,281
Contract Characteristics
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Timeline
Start Date: 2007-12-01
Current End Date: 2013-03-31
Potential End Date: 2013-03-31 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2017-04-11
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)