DoD's $121M Facilities Support Services Contract Awarded to DCA Under Full and Open Competition
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $121,198,686 ($121.2M)
Contractor: Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2007-07-11
End Date: 2010-07-31
Contract Duration: 1,116 days
Daily Burn Rate: $108.6K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 5
Pricing Type: COST PLUS AWARD FEE
Sector: Other
Official Description: BASIC PERIOD - O&M MORON
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $121.2 million to MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES for work described as: BASIC PERIOD - O&M MORON Key points: 1. The contract, valued at $121.2 million, covers Facilities Support Services for the Department of the Air Force. 2. Awarded under full and open competition, indicating a competitive bidding process. 3. The contract type is Cost Plus Award Fee, which incentivizes contractor performance. 4. The duration of the base period is 3 years, with potential for extensions. 5. The awardee is DCA, with the specific product/service code being 561210.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The Cost Plus Award Fee structure allows for performance-based incentives, but requires careful monitoring to ensure costs remain reasonable and aligned with awarded fees. Benchmarking against similar facilities support contracts is crucial.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
Full and open competition generally leads to better price discovery and potentially lower costs for the government. The use of multiple awardees (no=5) suggests a strategy to foster competition among qualified contractors.
Taxpayer Impact: The competitive nature of the award process is intended to maximize taxpayer value by securing services at the best possible price.
Public Impact
Ensures essential facilities support services are maintained for Air Force operations. The competitive award process aims to deliver value for taxpayer dollars. The contract's performance incentives may lead to improved service delivery. Transparency in the award process is maintained through full and open competition.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Cost Plus Award Fee contracts can sometimes lead to cost overruns if not managed tightly.
- The specific performance metrics and award fee structure need close scrutiny.
- Reliance on a single awardee (DCA) for this specific contract, despite multiple awards in the broader contract vehicle, warrants attention.
Positive Signals
- Awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a robust market.
- The contract includes performance incentives through the Award Fee structure.
- The base period duration is reasonable for facilities support services.
Sector Analysis
Facilities Support Services are critical for maintaining government infrastructure and operational readiness. Spending in this sector is generally stable, driven by the need for ongoing maintenance and operational support across various government agencies.
Small Business Impact
The data does not explicitly indicate the extent of small business participation in this specific award. Further analysis would be needed to determine if small businesses were involved as prime contractors or subcontractors.
Oversight & Accountability
The use of full and open competition and an award fee structure suggests a degree of oversight. However, the effectiveness of oversight depends on the agency's diligence in monitoring performance and costs.
Related Government Programs
- Facilities Support Services
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Department of the Air Force Programs
Risk Flags
- Potential for cost overruns in Cost Plus Award Fee contracts.
- Need for rigorous performance monitoring to ensure value for money.
- Lack of specific data on small business participation.
- Dependence on the effectiveness of the award fee structure for performance incentives.
Tags
facilities-support-services, department-of-defense, dca, 100m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $121.2 million to MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES. BASIC PERIOD - O&M MORON
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Air Force).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $121.2 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2007-07-11. End: 2010-07-31.
What is the typical cost range for similar facilities support services contracts within the Department of Defense, and how does this award compare?
Benchmarking this $121.2 million contract against similar facilities support services contracts within the DoD requires access to detailed cost data and contract specifics. Factors like scope of services, geographic location, and contract duration significantly influence pricing. Without specific comparative data, a precise assessment is difficult, but the full and open competition suggests an effort to achieve a competitive market rate.
What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) tied to the award fee, and how are they measured to mitigate performance risks?
The effectiveness of the Cost Plus Award Fee structure hinges on clearly defined, measurable, and achievable Key Performance Indicators (KPIs). The Department of the Air Force must have robust processes for tracking contractor performance against these KPIs and for objectively determining award fees. Without transparency into these specific KPIs and measurement methodologies, it's challenging to fully assess the risk mitigation strategy.
How does the inclusion of multiple awardees (no=5) on the broader contract vehicle impact the overall effectiveness and cost-efficiency of this specific award?
The presence of multiple awardees (no=5) on the contract vehicle suggests a strategy to ensure a pool of qualified contractors is available. For this specific award to DCA, the effectiveness and cost-efficiency depend on how well the competition within the vehicle was leveraged. If the competition for this particular task order was robust, it likely contributed to favorable pricing and service delivery. The agency's management of the contract vehicle is key.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Facilities Support Services › Facilities Support Services
Product/Service Code: OPERATION OF GOVT OWNED FACILITY › OPERATE GOVT OWNED BUILDINGS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Solicitation ID: FA561306R5010
Offers Received: 5
Pricing Type: COST PLUS AWARD FEE (R)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 2011 CRYSTAL DR STE 911, ARLINGTON, VA, 22202
Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $130,559,455
Exercised Options: $130,559,455
Current Obligation: $121,198,686
Contract Characteristics
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Timeline
Start Date: 2007-07-11
Current End Date: 2010-07-31
Potential End Date: 2010-07-31 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2016-02-29
More Contracts from Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees
- Additional Services Mca-Funded — $1.4B (Department of Defense)
- {piin: W27p4a05c0002} Bottled Water — $480.1M (Department of Defense)
- {piin: W91gy007c0053} Rule of LAW — $372.4M (Department of Defense)
- {piin: W91gdw07d4021} Reconstruction Security Support Services (rsss) — $188.8M (Department of Defense)
- {piin: W91gxy06c0094} AL Qudas GAS Turbine Expansion — $169.5M (Department of Defense)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)