DoD's $19.7M contract for program management services awarded to Science Applications International Corporation

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $19,703,398 ($19.7M)

Contractor: Science Applications International Corporation

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2003-09-10

End Date: 2009-03-14

Contract Duration: 2,012 days

Daily Burn Rate: $9.8K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS

Sector: Other

Official Description: 200311!000081!5700!NA02 !HQ AFSOC/PK !GS23F8006H !C!N! !Y!FA002103F0007 !20030910!20040914!036537413!036537413!054781240!N!SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATI!901 D ST SW, SUITE 201 !WASHINGTON !DC!20024!20074!091!12!EGLIN AUX FLD 9 !OKALOOSA !FLORIDA !+000000740000!N!N!000000000000!R408!PROGRAM MANAGEMENT/SUPPORT SERVICES !S1 !SERVICES !3000!NOT DISCERNABLE OR CLASSIFIED !611710!E! !6! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! ! ! !A! ! ! !000! ! ! ! ! ! ! !Y!C!N!N! ! ! ! ! ! !* ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! !

Place of Performance

Location: HURLBURT FIELD, OKALOOSA County, FLORIDA, 32544, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

State: Florida Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $19.7 million to SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION for work described as: 200311!000081!5700!NA02 !HQ AFSOC/PK !GS23F8006H !C!N! !Y!FA002103F0007 !20030910!20040914!036537413!036537413!054781240!N!SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATI!901 D ST SW, SUITE 201 !WASHINGTON !DC!20024!20074!091!12!EGLIN AUX FLD 9 !OKALOOSA !FLORIDA !+000000740000!N!N!000000000000!R… Key points: 1. Contract awarded for program management and support services, indicating a need for specialized expertise. 2. The duration of the contract (over 6 years) suggests a long-term requirement for these services. 3. Awarded by the Department of the Air Force, highlighting its role in supporting aviation and defense initiatives. 4. The contract was competed fully and openly, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 5. The contractor, Science Applications International Corporation, is a large, established entity in the defense sector. 6. The contract type is Time and Materials, which can sometimes lead to cost overruns if not managed carefully.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The total value of $19.7 million over more than six years averages to approximately $3.28 million per year. This figure needs to be benchmarked against similar program management support contracts within the Department of Defense and specifically the Air Force. Without more granular data on the specific services rendered and the labor categories involved, a precise value-for-money assessment is challenging. However, the duration and scope suggest a significant investment in specialized support.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that multiple bidders had the opportunity to submit proposals. The presence of 3 bids suggests a moderate level of competition for this specific requirement. A higher number of bidders typically leads to more competitive pricing and a wider range of innovative solutions, but three bidders still provide a basis for price discovery.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition generally benefits taxpayers by fostering a competitive environment that can drive down costs and improve service quality.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are likely the Department of the Air Force units requiring program management and support services. Services delivered include program management and support, crucial for the efficient execution of defense initiatives. The geographic impact is centered around Eglin Auxiliary Field 9 in Florida, a key operational area for the Air Force. Workforce implications may include the direct employment of personnel by Science Applications International Corporation to fulfill the contract requirements.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Time and Materials contract type can pose a risk of cost escalation if not closely monitored.
The lack of specific details on deliverables makes it difficult to fully assess performance against expectations.
The contract's long duration could lead to vendor lock-in if not managed with future needs in mind.

Positive Signals

Awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a fair and transparent procurement process.
The contractor, Science Applications International Corporation, has a significant presence and experience in government contracting.
The contract supports critical program management functions within the Department of Defense.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the professional, scientific, and technical services sector, specifically focusing on management and consulting services. The federal government, particularly the Department of Defense, is a major consumer of these services to manage complex programs and operations. Comparable spending benchmarks would involve looking at other contracts for program management support within defense agencies, which often represent substantial investments due to the complexity and criticality of military operations.

Small Business Impact

There is no indication that this contract was set aside for small businesses, nor is there explicit information about subcontracting plans for small businesses. Given the nature of the services and the prime contractor's size, the focus is likely on large-scale program execution rather than direct small business set-asides. However, subcontracting opportunities may exist depending on the specific tasks required.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the contracting officer and program managers within the Department of the Air Force. Accountability measures would be defined in the contract's statement of work and performance metrics. Transparency is generally facilitated through contract award databases, though specific performance details may be sensitive. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of fraud, waste, or abuse.

Related Government Programs

Defense Program Management Support
Air Force Logistics and Support Services
Professional Services Contracts
Management Consulting Services

Risk Flags

Time and Materials contract type
Moderate competition level
Long contract duration

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $19.7 million to SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION. 200311!000081!5700!NA02 !HQ AFSOC/PK !GS23F8006H !C!N! !Y!FA002103F0007 !20030910!20040914!036537413!036537413!054781240!N!SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATI!901 D ST SW, SUITE 201 !WASHINGTON !DC!20024!20074!091!12!EGLIN AUX FLD 9 !OKALOOSA !FLORIDA !+000000740000!N!N!000000000000!R408!PROGRAM MANAGEMENT/SUPPORT SERVICES !S1 !SERVICES !3000!NOT DISCERNABLE OR CLASSIFIED !611710!E! !6! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! ! ! !A! ! ! !000! ! ! ! ! ! ! !Y!C!N!N! ! ! ! ! ! !* ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! !

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Air Force).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $19.7 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2003-09-10. End: 2009-03-14.

What specific program management functions were performed under this contract?

The provided data indicates the contract was for 'PROGRAM MANAGEMENT/SUPPORT SERVICES'. While the specific functions are not detailed, this generally encompasses a range of activities such as planning, organizing, directing, and controlling resources to achieve program objectives. This could include tasks like budget management, schedule tracking, risk assessment, stakeholder coordination, and ensuring compliance with regulations and policies. For a contract of this value and duration, it likely supported a significant defense program or portfolio of programs, requiring comprehensive oversight and administrative support to ensure successful execution and delivery of military capabilities.

How does the $19.7 million total award compare to similar program management contracts within the DoD?

Benchmarking this $19.7 million contract against similar program management contracts within the Department of Defense requires access to a broader dataset of comparable awards. However, for a contract spanning over six years (from September 2003 to March 2009), the average annual value is approximately $3.28 million. This is a substantial amount, reflecting the complexity and criticality often associated with defense program management. Larger, more complex programs, especially those involving advanced technology or large-scale operations, can command significantly higher annual values, sometimes tens or hundreds of millions of dollars. Conversely, smaller, more focused support roles might be valued lower. Without knowing the specific program supported, it's difficult to definitively state if $19.7M is high or low, but it represents a significant investment in specialized support services.

What is the track record of Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC) in performing similar government contracts?

Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC) is a well-established and large government contractor with a extensive history of performing a wide array of services for federal agencies, including the Department of Defense. They have a significant track record in areas such as IT services, systems engineering, cybersecurity, and program management support. Their experience spans numerous complex defense programs and civilian agency initiatives. While specific performance metrics for individual contracts are not publicly detailed in this data, SAIC's continued success in winning and executing large government contracts suggests a generally positive track record. However, like any large contractor, they may have faced performance challenges or contract disputes on specific projects over their history.

What are the potential risks associated with a Time and Materials (T&M) contract of this nature?

Time and Materials (T&M) contracts, like the one awarded to SAIC, carry inherent risks, primarily related to cost control. In a T&M arrangement, the government pays the contractor for the actual labor hours expended and the cost of materials used. The primary risk for the government is that costs can escalate beyond initial estimates if the contractor's efficiency is low, if the scope of work expands without proper controls, or if there is a lack of diligent oversight. For this $19.7 million contract spanning over six years, the potential for cost overruns is a significant concern. Effective management requires robust government oversight to monitor labor hours, ensure fair market rates for personnel, and scrutinize material costs to ensure value for taxpayer money.

How does the competition level (3 bidders) impact price discovery and value for this contract?

Having three bidders for this contract provides a moderate level of competition, which is generally beneficial for price discovery. With multiple offers, the government has a basis for comparing proposed prices and determining if they are fair and reasonable. A higher number of bidders (e.g., five or more) typically intensifies competition, potentially driving prices lower and encouraging more innovative solutions. Conversely, a sole-source or single-bid scenario offers little to no price competition, increasing the risk of paying above-market rates. While three bidders are not ideal, it is significantly better than limited competition, suggesting that taxpayers likely received a reasonably competitive price, though perhaps not the absolute lowest possible.

What is the significance of this contract being awarded by the Department of the Air Force?

The award by the Department of the Air Force (DAF) signifies that the program management and support services procured under this contract were deemed essential for Air Force operations, readiness, or modernization efforts. The DAF manages a vast array of complex systems, including aircraft, space assets, and command and control networks. Contracts for program management support are critical for overseeing the development, acquisition, sustainment, and modernization of these capabilities. This particular contract, awarded to SAIC, likely supported a specific program or initiative within the Air Force, contributing to its ability to execute its mission effectively and efficiently. The location of performance at Eglin Auxiliary Field 9 further suggests a connection to Air Force operational testing or training activities.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services › Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › MANAGEMENT SUPPORT SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS (Y)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 1710 SAIC DR, MCLEAN, VA, 22102

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Contract Characteristics

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: GS23F8006H

IDV Type: FSS

Timeline