DoD awards $12.5M for Equipment Maintenance & Repair to Defense Contract Services, Inc

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $12,505,047 ($12.5M)

Contractor: Defense Contract Services, Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2002-06-06

End Date: 2009-03-31

Contract Duration: 2,490 days

Daily Burn Rate: $5.0K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Number of Offers Received: 5

Pricing Type: COMBINATION (TWO OR MORE)

Sector: Defense

Official Description: 200209!000684!5700!GE20 !OGDEN ALC/PKO !F4265002C0094 !A!N! !Y! !20020606!20080930!003794588!003794588!003794588!N!DEFENSE CONTRACT SERVICES, INC!12731 HWY 183N !AUSTIN !TX!78759!35410!011!49!HILL AFB !DAVIS !UTAH !+000000316355!N!N!000000000000!J099!MAINT & REPAIR OF EQ/MISCELLANEOUS EQUIPMENT !S1 !SERVICES !3000!NOT DISCERNABLE OR CLASSIFIED !514210!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B!F!N!A! !A!U!J!2!005!K! !C!N!Z! ! !N!B!N!N! !B!A! !B!A!000!A!B!N! ! ! ! ! ! !0001!

Place of Performance

Location: HILL AFB, DAVIS County, UTAH, 84056

State: Utah Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $12.5 million to DEFENSE CONTRACT SERVICES, INC. for work described as: 200209!000684!5700!GE20 !OGDEN ALC/PKO !F4265002C0094 !A!N! !Y! !20020606!20080930!003794588!003794588!003794588!N!DEFENSE CONTRACT SERVICES, INC!12731 HWY 183N !AUSTIN !TX!78759!35410!011!49!HILL AFB !DAVIS… Key points: 1. The contract focuses on maintenance and repair of miscellaneous equipment, a critical but often overlooked area of defense spending. 2. Defense Contract Services, Inc. secured this award, indicating potential specialization or established performance in this niche. 3. The contract's duration of over two years suggests a need for ongoing support, highlighting potential long-term reliance. 4. Competition was conducted under 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources,' suggesting a specific justification for limiting initial bidders.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $12.5 million over approximately two years needs to be benchmarked against similar maintenance and repair contracts for specialized equipment to assess value.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: limited

The contract was awarded under 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources,' which implies a specific reason for not considering all potential offerors from the outset. This method may limit price discovery compared to unrestricted full and open competition.

Taxpayer Impact: The total taxpayer impact is $12.5 million, allocated for essential equipment maintenance. The efficiency of this spending depends on the competitive landscape and the necessity of the services procured.

Public Impact

Ensures operational readiness of critical defense equipment through necessary maintenance and repair services. Supports a private sector company, Defense Contract Services, Inc., contributing to employment and economic activity. The specific equipment being maintained is not detailed, limiting public understanding of the direct impact on defense capabilities.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Limited competition method raises questions about optimal pricing.
Lack of detail on specific equipment maintained hinders public assessment of necessity.
Contract duration could indicate a lack of readily available alternatives or a need for specialized skills.

Positive Signals

Addresses a fundamental need for equipment upkeep, crucial for military operations.
Award to a specific company suggests a potentially established relationship or expertise.
The contract value, while significant, is for a defined period and scope.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Defense sector, specifically related to the maintenance and repair of equipment. Spending benchmarks in this area can vary widely based on the type and complexity of the equipment being serviced.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that this contract was not awarded to small businesses, as the 'SB' field is 'N'. Further analysis would be needed to determine if small business participation was sought or subcontracted.

Oversight & Accountability

The contract was awarded by the Department of Defense, specifically the Department of the Air Force. Oversight would typically involve contract management offices ensuring performance and adherence to terms, but specific oversight mechanisms are not detailed here.

Related Government Programs

Department of Defense Contracting
Department of the Air Force Programs

Risk Flags

Limited competition raises concerns about price competitiveness.
Lack of specificity regarding equipment hinders transparency.
Potential for sole-source-like conditions despite 'full and open' designation.
No indication of small business subcontracting opportunities.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $12.5 million to DEFENSE CONTRACT SERVICES, INC.. 200209!000684!5700!GE20 !OGDEN ALC/PKO !F4265002C0094 !A!N! !Y! !20020606!20080930!003794588!003794588!003794588!N!DEFENSE CONTRACT SERVICES, INC!12731 HWY 183N !AUSTIN !TX!78759!35410!011!49!HILL AFB !DAVIS !UTAH !+000000316355!N!N!000000000000!J099!MAINT & REPAIR OF EQ/MISCELLANEOUS EQUIPMENT !S1 !SERVICES !3000!NOT DISCERNABLE OR CLASSIFIED !514210!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is DEFENSE CONTRACT SERVICES, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Air Force).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $12.5 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2002-06-06. End: 2009-03-31.

What specific types of equipment are covered under this maintenance and repair contract, and how does their criticality influence the contract's value and urgency?

The contract specifies 'MAINT & REPAIR OF EQ/MISCELLANEOUS EQUIPMENT.' Without further detail, it's difficult to ascertain the exact equipment. However, the $12.5 million award suggests either a large quantity of items or highly specialized, critical equipment requiring significant technical expertise for maintenance and repair, directly impacting operational readiness.

What were the specific justifications for excluding other potential sources in this 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources' award, and how did this impact the final price?

The justification for excluding other sources is not explicitly provided in the data. This procurement method typically requires a compelling reason, such as unique capabilities or urgent needs. The exclusion likely limited the number of bidders, potentially leading to a higher price than if broader competition had been pursued.

How does the performance history of Defense Contract Services, Inc. on similar contracts inform the assessment of this award's effectiveness and value for taxpayer money?

The provided data does not include performance history for Defense Contract Services, Inc. A comprehensive assessment of effectiveness and value would require reviewing past performance records, customer satisfaction surveys, and any documented issues or successes on previous, similar contracts awarded to this vendor.

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Offers Received: 5

Pricing Type: COMBINATION (TWO OR MORE) (2)

Contractor Details

Address: 12731 HWY 183N, AUSTIN, TX, 90

Business Categories: Category Business, Small Business, Veteran Owned Business

Contract Characteristics

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Timeline