Defense contract for Learjet aircraft program management and support services awarded to Learjet Inc. for over $79,000

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $9,914,832 ($9.9M)

Contractor: Learjet Inc

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2000-08-02

End Date: 2010-11-05

Contract Duration: 3,747 days

Daily Burn Rate: $2.6K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS

Sector: Defense

Official Description: 200011!5700!000210!GD90 !OC-ALC/LKD (CLS AIRCRAFT) !F3460199C0363 !A!*!P00006 !20000802!20000915!007234313!053894002!202276952!N!24210!LEARJET INC !1 LEARJET WAY !WICHITA !KS!67209!79000!173!20!WICHITA !SEDGWICK !KANSAS !0001!+000000037552!N!N!000000000000!R408!PROGRAM MANAGEMENT/SUPPORT SERVICES !A1A!AIRFRAMES AND SPARES !3AMB!AABNCP-E4 !3728!3!A!S!B!B!A!*!C !U!Y!1!001!N!1B!A!N!Z!* !* !N!C!*!A!A!A!A!A!A!* !*!N!A!B!N!*!*!*!*!*!

Place of Performance

Location: WICHITA, SEDGWICK County, KANSAS, 67209

State: Kansas Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $9.9 million to LEARJET INC for work described as: 200011!5700!000210!GD90 !OC-ALC/LKD (CLS AIRCRAFT) !F3460199C0363 !A!*!P00006 !20000802!20000915!007234313!053894002!202276952!N!24210!LEARJET INC !1 LEARJET WAY !WICHITA !KS!67209!79000!173!20!WICHITA !SED… Key points: 1. Contract awarded for program management and support services related to Learjet aircraft. 2. The contract was competed on a full and open basis. 3. The contract type is Time and Materials, which can pose cost control challenges. 4. The contract duration was substantial, spanning over 12 years. 5. The primary contractor is Learjet Inc., the original equipment manufacturer. 6. The contract was awarded by the Defense Contract Management Agency.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $79,000 appears low for a 12-year program management and support services contract, suggesting it may represent a specific, limited scope or a base amount for a larger indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity (IDIQ) vehicle. Without more detailed information on the services rendered and the total task orders issued, a comprehensive value assessment is difficult. However, the Time and Materials (T&M) contract type, while flexible, can lead to cost overruns if not closely managed, raising potential value concerns.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. The data does not specify the number of bidders, but full and open competition generally promotes a competitive environment, which can lead to better pricing and innovation. The fact that it was competed suggests that the agency sought multiple offers to ensure the best value.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayers benefit from full and open competition as it typically drives down prices through market forces, ensuring that government funds are used more efficiently.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are likely the Department of Defense units operating Learjet aircraft, receiving essential program management and support. Services delivered include program management and support for airframes and spares. The geographic impact is centered around the contractor's location in Wichita, Kansas, and potentially any deployed locations of the supported aircraft. Workforce implications include employment at Learjet Inc. and potentially at the contracting agency for oversight.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Time and Materials contract type can lead to uncontrolled cost growth if not managed diligently.
Long contract duration (over 12 years) may indicate potential for scope creep or evolving requirements without re-competition.
Limited data on specific deliverables and performance metrics makes it difficult to assess effectiveness.
The relatively low stated contract value for such a long period raises questions about the scope or completeness of the reported data.

Positive Signals

Awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a competitive process was utilized.
Contractor is the original equipment manufacturer (Learjet Inc.), potentially offering specialized expertise.
Contract supports critical aircraft operations for the Department of Defense.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the aerospace and defense sector, specifically focusing on aircraft support and program management. The market for such services is characterized by specialized technical expertise and long-standing relationships between manufacturers and government agencies. Comparable spending benchmarks would involve analyzing other contracts for aircraft fleet support and program management across different military branches and aircraft types.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss=false, sb=false). As the primary contractor is Learjet Inc., a large aerospace manufacturer, there is potential for subcontracting opportunities for small businesses within the aerospace supply chain. However, without specific subcontracting plans or goals detailed in the award, the direct impact on the small business ecosystem is unclear.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA), which is responsible for ensuring contractor compliance with terms and conditions. Accountability measures would be embedded in the contract's performance standards and reporting requirements. Transparency is facilitated through contract databases like FPDS, though detailed performance reports are often not publicly available.

Related Government Programs

Aircraft Maintenance and Repair
Aerospace Engineering Services
Defense Program Management
Airframe Spares Procurement
Government Aviation Support

Risk Flags

Time and Materials Contract Type
Long Contract Duration
Limited Performance Data Available

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $9.9 million to LEARJET INC. 200011!5700!000210!GD90 !OC-ALC/LKD (CLS AIRCRAFT) !F3460199C0363 !A!*!P00006 !20000802!20000915!007234313!053894002!202276952!N!24210!LEARJET INC !1 LEARJET WAY !WICHITA !KS!67209!79000!173!20!WICHITA !SEDGWICK !KANSAS !0001!+000000037552!N!N!000000000000!R408!PROGRAM MANAGEMENT/SUPPORT SERVICES !A1A!AIRFRAMES AND SPARES !3AMB!AABNCP-E4 !3728!3!A!S!B!B!A!*!C !U!Y!

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is LEARJET INC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Defense Contract Management Agency).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $9.9 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2000-08-02. End: 2010-11-05.

What was the total value of task orders issued under this contract, given its long duration?

The provided data indicates an award amount of $79,000 for contract F3460199C0363. However, the contract's period of performance spans from August 2, 2000, to November 5, 2010, a duration of over 10 years. Contracts with such long durations, especially those for program management and support, often utilize an Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) structure or have base award amounts with subsequent modifications and task orders that significantly increase the total obligated amount. The reported $79,000 may represent only the initial award or a small portion of the total spending over the contract's life. To understand the full financial scope, one would need to examine contract modifications and all issued task orders, which are not detailed in this summary data.

How did Learjet Inc.'s pricing compare to other potential bidders during the full and open competition?

The provided data indicates that the contract was awarded under 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION'. However, it does not include details on the number of bids received or the pricing proposed by each bidder. Therefore, a direct comparison of Learjet Inc.'s pricing against competitors is not possible with this information. Full and open competition is designed to encourage multiple bids, which theoretically allows the government to select the most advantageous offer based on price and other factors. Without the competitive pricing data, we cannot definitively state how Learjet Inc.'s pricing benchmarked against others in this specific procurement.

What specific program management and support services were rendered under this contract?

The contract description lists 'PROGRAM MANAGEMENT/SUPPORT SERVICES' and the Product Service Code (PSC) is R408, which typically covers 'Logistics Management Services'. The 'na' field indicates 'Engineering Services' (541330). While the contract is for Learjet aircraft, the specific nature of the program management and support services is not detailed. This could encompass a range of activities such as lifecycle management, technical support, maintenance planning, supply chain management for spares, configuration management, and overall program coordination for the Learjet fleet operated by the Department of Defense. Further details would likely be found in the contract's Statement of Work (SOW).

What is the historical spending pattern for Learjet aircraft program management and support services by the Department of Defense?

This contract (F3460199C0363) represents spending on Learjet aircraft program management and support services from 2000 to 2010. To establish a historical spending pattern, one would need to analyze all contracts awarded by the Department of Defense (and potentially other federal agencies) for similar services related to Learjet aircraft over a longer period. This would involve searching contract databases for relevant PSC codes, keywords (e.g., 'Learjet', 'program management', 'support services'), and contractor names. Analyzing trends in award values, contract types, and competition levels over time would reveal historical spending patterns and identify periods of increased or decreased investment in these services.

Are there any performance concerns or notable successes associated with Learjet Inc. on this contract?

The provided data summary does not contain specific performance metrics, contractor performance evaluations (like CPARS), or details regarding any formal disputes or successes related to this contract. Therefore, it is not possible to assess performance concerns or notable successes based solely on this information. Typically, such information would be available through government performance management systems or contract close-out documentation. The Time and Materials nature of the contract suggests a need for close monitoring to ensure performance aligns with cost objectives.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services › Engineering Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS (Y)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Bombardier Inc. (UEI: 202276952)

Address: 1 LEARJET WAY, WICHITA, KS, 04

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Contract Characteristics

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Timeline