DoD Awards $26.18M Contract for Technical Assistance to Schafer Corporation

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $26,188,017 ($26.2M)

Contractor: Schafer Government Services, LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2000-06-01

End Date: 2008-11-30

Contract Duration: 3,104 days

Daily Burn Rate: $8.4K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 7

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Defense

Official Description: 200008!5700!000332!CA09 !45 CONS/LGC !F0865000C0016 !A!*!* !20000525!20010930!069341303!069341303!069341303!N!8F406!SCHAFER CORPORATION !321 BILLERICA RD !CHELMSFORD !MA!01824!57792!001!06!PLEASANTON !ALAMEDA !CALIFORNIA!0001!+000000500000!N!N!000000000000!R421!TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE !C9E!ALL OTHER SUPPLIES AND EQUIPME!3000!NOT DISCERNABLE OR CLASSIFIED !8734!3!*!*!*!B!A!*!A !N!U!2!007!B!* !Z!N!Z!* !* !N!C!*!A!A!A!A!A!A!* !*!N!A!C!N!*!*!*!*!*!

Place of Performance

Location: NORTH BILLERICA, MIDDLESEX County, MASSACHUSETTS, 01862

State: Massachusetts Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $26.2 million to SCHAFER GOVERNMENT SERVICES, LLC for work described as: 200008!5700!000332!CA09 !45 CONS/LGC !F0865000C0016 !A!*!* !20000525!20010930!069341303!069341303!069341303!N!8F406!SCHAFER CORPORATION !321 BILLERICA RD !CHELMSFORD !MA!01824!57792!001!06!PLEASANTON !ALAMEDA !CALIFORNIA!0001!+000000500000!N!N!000000000000!R421!TECHNICAL ASSISTAN… Key points: 1. Contract awarded to Schafer Corporation for technical assistance services. 2. The contract has a duration of 3104 days, spanning from May 2000 to September 2001. 3. Awarded under full and open competition, indicating a competitive bidding process. 4. The contract type is a definitive contract with a firm fixed price. 5. The primary sector appears to be Defense, with a specific focus on testing laboratories and services.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The total award amount is $26.18 million. Without specific unit costs or detailed service breakdowns, a precise per-unit cost assessment is difficult. However, the duration suggests a significant, long-term engagement.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, suggesting that multiple vendors had the opportunity to bid. This method generally promotes price discovery and competitive pricing.

Taxpayer Impact: The competitive nature of the award suggests that taxpayers likely received a fair price for the technical assistance services rendered.

Public Impact

This contract provides essential technical assistance services to the Department of Defense. The duration of the contract indicates a sustained need for these specialized services. Awarded through full and open competition, ensuring a broad range of potential providers were considered.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of detailed service breakdown for cost analysis.
Long contract duration without clear performance metrics provided.
No indication of small business participation.

Positive Signals

Awarded under full and open competition.
Firm fixed price contract type can provide cost certainty.
Services are critical for defense operations.

Sector Analysis

The contract falls under the 'Testing Laboratories and Services' industry, a common area for technical support within the Defense sector. Spending benchmarks for similar technical assistance contracts can vary widely based on scope and duration.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that this contract was not awarded to a small business. Further analysis would be needed to determine if small business subcontracting opportunities were pursued or required.

Oversight & Accountability

The contract was managed by the Defense Contract Management Agency, suggesting established oversight mechanisms. However, the long duration necessitates ongoing monitoring to ensure continued value and performance.

Related Government Programs

Testing Laboratories and Services
Department of Defense Contracting
Defense Contract Management Agency Programs

Risk Flags

Long contract duration without clear performance metrics.
Lack of detailed service description for cost analysis.
No small business participation indicated.
Potential for cost overruns if scope was not well-defined initially.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $26.2 million to SCHAFER GOVERNMENT SERVICES, LLC. 200008!5700!000332!CA09 !45 CONS/LGC !F0865000C0016 !A!*!* !20000525!20010930!069341303!069341303!069341303!N!8F406!SCHAFER CORPORATION !321 BILLERICA RD !CHELMSFORD !MA!01824!57792!001!06!PLEASANTON !ALAMEDA !CALIFORNIA!0001!+000000500000!N!N!000000000000!R421!TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE !C9E!ALL OTHER SUPPLIES AND EQUIPME!3000!NOT DISCERNABLE OR CLASSIFIED !8734!3!*!*!*!B!A!*!A !N!U!2!007!B!* !Z!N!Z!* !* !N!C!*!A!A!A!A!A!A!* !*!N!A!C!N!*!*!*!*!*!

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is SCHAFER GOVERNMENT SERVICES, LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Defense Contract Management Agency).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $26.2 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2000-06-01. End: 2008-11-30.

What specific technical assistance was provided under this contract, and how did it contribute to the Department of Defense's mission?

The contract data identifies the service as 'Technical Assistance' under PSC 'R421'. While the specific nature of the assistance is not detailed, it likely involved specialized expertise, analysis, or support critical to DoD operations. Without further documentation, its precise contribution to the mission remains general, but such services are typically vital for program execution, system development, or operational readiness.

Given the 3104-day duration, were there any performance reviews or adjustments made to the contract to ensure continued effectiveness and value?

The provided data does not include details on performance reviews or contract adjustments. For a contract of this length, regular performance assessments and potential modifications would be standard practice to ensure the services remain effective and aligned with evolving needs. The absence of this information in the summary data warrants further investigation into contract management records.

How did the firm fixed price structure impact the overall cost-effectiveness of this long-term technical assistance contract?

A firm fixed price (FFP) contract aims to provide cost certainty for the government by establishing a price that is not subject to adjustment based on the contractor's cost experience. For a long-term contract like this, an FFP can be beneficial if the scope of work is well-defined and risks are understood. However, it also places the cost risk on the contractor, potentially leading to higher initial pricing to account for unforeseen issues.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services › Testing Laboratories and Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Offers Received: 7

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Citigroup Inc. (UEI: 197329691)

Address: 101 BILLERICA AVENUE, BUILDING 5, SUITE 201, NORTH BILLERICA, MA, 01862

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $26,316,583

Exercised Options: $26,316,583

Current Obligation: $26,188,017

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Timeline