EPA Spends $18M on CERCLA Site Remediation Services with URS Operating Services, Inc

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $18,031,004 ($18.0M)

Contractor: URS Operating Services, Inc

Awarding Agency: Environmental Protection Agency

Start Date: 2005-11-01

End Date: 2013-06-30

Contract Duration: 2,798 days

Daily Burn Rate: $6.4K/day

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: REMOVAL CERCLA

Place of Performance

Location: DENVER, DENVER County, COLORADO, 80202

State: Colorado Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Environmental Protection Agency obligated $18.0 million to URS OPERATING SERVICES, INC for work described as: REMOVAL CERCLA Key points: 1. Contract awarded for CERCLA site remediation, a critical environmental cleanup function. 2. URS Operating Services, Inc. is a significant player in environmental remediation. 3. Potential risks include cost overruns and schedule delays common in complex cleanup projects. 4. Spending falls within the broad 'Environmental Services' sector.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $18 million over approximately 7.5 years suggests a moderate annual spend. Benchmarking against similar large-scale CERCLA remediation contracts would be necessary for a precise assessment, but the duration and scope indicate a substantial investment.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: unknown

The competition method is not specified, which impacts price discovery. If awarded through a limited or sole-source process, the government may not have achieved the most competitive pricing. Full and open competition typically yields better value.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayer funds are utilized for environmental cleanup. The ultimate impact depends on the effectiveness of the remediation and whether the contract was awarded at a fair and reasonable price.

Public Impact

Protects public health and the environment by addressing hazardous substance contamination. Supports compliance with federal environmental laws like CERCLA. Contributes to the restoration of potentially contaminated land for future use.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 60 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of competition detail
Potential for cost overruns in complex remediation

Positive Signals

Addresses critical environmental cleanup needs
Long-term contract providing stability for remediation efforts

Sector Analysis

This contract falls under environmental remediation services, a specialized sector focused on cleaning up hazardous waste sites. Spending benchmarks for such projects vary widely based on site complexity, scale, and regulatory requirements.

Small Business Impact

No information is available regarding small business participation in this contract. Large environmental remediation projects often involve prime contractors who may subcontract portions of the work.

Oversight & Accountability

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is responsible for overseeing this contract. Robust oversight is crucial to ensure work is performed effectively, safely, and within budget, especially for complex environmental projects.

Related Government Programs

Remediation Services
Environmental Protection Agency Contracting
Environmental Protection Agency Programs

Risk Flags

Potential for cost overruns
Schedule delays
Environmental risks during remediation
Uncertainty regarding competition method and pricing impact

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Environmental Protection Agency awarded $18.0 million to URS OPERATING SERVICES, INC. REMOVAL CERCLA

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is URS OPERATING SERVICES, INC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Environmental Protection Agency (Environmental Protection Agency).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $18.0 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2005-11-01. End: 2013-06-30.

What was the specific justification for the procurement method used, and how did it influence the final price?

The specific justification for the procurement method is not detailed in the provided data. If the contract was not awarded under full and open competition, it could potentially lead to higher costs for taxpayers. Understanding the rationale behind the chosen method is key to assessing value for money and ensuring fair pricing.

What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) for this remediation contract, and how is URS's performance against them being measured?

Key performance indicators for CERCLA remediation typically include adherence to cleanup standards, environmental protection measures, project timelines, and budget management. The EPA's oversight would involve monitoring URS's progress against these KPIs to ensure effective and compliant site cleanup. Specific KPIs are not detailed here.

What is the long-term environmental impact and cost-effectiveness of the remediation strategy employed under this contract?

The long-term environmental impact and cost-effectiveness depend on the specific contaminants, the chosen remediation technologies, and the success in meeting cleanup goals. A thorough assessment would require reviewing post-remediation monitoring data and comparing the lifecycle costs against alternative approaches or the costs of inaction.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Remediation and Other Waste Management Services › Remediation Services

Product/Service Code: NATURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT › ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS PROTECTION

Contractor Details

Address: 1099 18TH ST STE 710, DENVER, CO, 90

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $18,031,004

Exercised Options: $18,031,004

Current Obligation: $18,031,004

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: EPW05050

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline