Transportation contract for business support services awarded to SERCO MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC. for over $23 million
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $23,238,169 ($23.2M)
Contractor: Serco Management Services, Inc.
Awarding Agency: Department of Transportation
Start Date: 2010-02-01
End Date: 2015-06-30
Contract Duration: 1,975 days
Daily Burn Rate: $11.8K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 3
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Other
Official Description: SERCO AREA 7
Place of Performance
Location: RESTON, FAIRFAX County, VIRGINIA, 20190, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
State: Virginia Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Transportation obligated $23.2 million to SERCO MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC. for work described as: SERCO AREA 7 Key points: 1. Contract value of $23.2M over 5 years suggests a significant investment in business support services. 2. Awarded under full and open competition, indicating a potentially competitive bidding process. 3. The contract's duration of nearly 2000 days points to a long-term need for these services. 4. Fixed-price contract type may offer cost certainty but could limit flexibility for evolving needs. 5. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 561499 covers a broad range of 'All Other Business Support Services'. 6. The contract was awarded by the Federal Aviation Administration, suggesting a focus on aviation-related support. 7. The geographic location of the award (Virginia) may indicate a concentration of FAA operations or personnel in that region.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract value of $23.2 million over approximately five years averages to about $4.6 million annually. Without specific details on the services rendered, it's challenging to benchmark against similar contracts. However, the fixed-price nature suggests an attempt to control costs, but the broad NAICS code could imply a wide range of potential service costs. Further analysis would require understanding the specific deliverables and comparing them to industry standards for business support services.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under 'full and open competition,' which typically means that all responsible sources were permitted to submit a bid. With 3 bidders, this suggests a moderate level of competition. While more than one bidder is positive, a higher number of bidders generally leads to more robust price discovery and potentially lower prices for the government. The specific details of the solicitation and evaluation process would further clarify the effectiveness of this competition.
Taxpayer Impact: A competitive bidding process, even with three bidders, is generally favorable for taxpayers as it encourages lower pricing and better service offerings compared to sole-source awards.
Public Impact
The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) is the primary beneficiary, receiving business support services essential for its operations. The contract likely supports administrative, logistical, or other business functions within the FAA. The geographic impact is concentrated in Virginia, where the contractor SERCO MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC. is located and likely performs the services. Workforce implications may include employment opportunities for individuals with skills in business support, administration, and potentially specialized areas depending on the exact services.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Broad NAICS code (561499) could lead to scope creep or performance issues if not clearly defined.
- Fixed-price contract may not adequately account for unforeseen changes in service requirements.
- Limited competition (3 bidders) might have resulted in a higher-than-optimal price.
- Contract duration of nearly 5 years could lead to contractor complacency or outdated service delivery methods.
Positive Signals
- Awarded under full and open competition, indicating an effort to secure the best value.
- Fixed-price contract provides cost certainty for the government.
- Contractor SERCO MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC. has a track record, implying experience in delivering services.
- The contract duration suggests a stable and ongoing need for the services provided.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the Business Support Services sector, specifically under NAICS code 561499. This broad category encompasses a wide array of services such as collection agencies, credit bureaus, mailing services, and telemarketing. The Federal Aviation Administration's use of such services indicates a need for operational efficiency and administrative support. Comparable spending benchmarks would depend heavily on the specific services procured, but the overall market for business support services is substantial, with numerous providers ranging from small specialized firms to large diversified companies like Serco.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates that this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). Therefore, small businesses are unlikely to be direct beneficiaries of this award. However, there may be subcontracting opportunities if Serco chooses to engage small businesses for specific tasks, though this is not explicitly stated. The overall impact on the small business ecosystem would be minimal unless significant subcontracting occurs.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would primarily reside with the contracting officers and program managers within the Federal Aviation Administration. As a firm-fixed-price contract, oversight would focus on ensuring that the services delivered meet the contract's specifications and performance standards. Transparency is generally facilitated through contract award databases like FPDS. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any allegations of fraud, waste, or abuse arise.
Related Government Programs
- Federal Aviation Administration Operations
- Business Support Services Contracts
- Department of Transportation Procurement
- Firm Fixed Price Contracts
- Contracting with Serco
Risk Flags
- Broad NAICS code may indicate unclear service definition.
- Moderate competition level could impact price optimization.
- Fixed-price contract risks for evolving service needs.
Tags
transportation, federal-aviation-administration, serco-management-services-inc, business-support-services, firm-fixed-price, full-and-open-competition, virginia, naics-561499, large-contract, multi-year-contract
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Transportation awarded $23.2 million to SERCO MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC.. SERCO AREA 7
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is SERCO MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Transportation (Federal Aviation Administration).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $23.2 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2010-02-01. End: 2015-06-30.
What specific business support services were provided under this contract?
The contract falls under NAICS code 561499, 'All Other Business Support Services.' This is a very broad category that can include services such as administrative support, mail processing, call center operations, document management, and other general business functions. Without access to the detailed contract statement of work (SOW), it is impossible to specify the exact services rendered. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) likely utilized these services to enhance operational efficiency, manage administrative tasks, or support specific programs. The nature of these services would dictate their impact on FAA's mission and operational effectiveness.
How does the $23.2 million contract value compare to similar FAA contracts for business support services?
Benchmarking this $23.2 million contract requires comparing it to other FAA contracts for 'All Other Business Support Services' (NAICS 561499) awarded over a similar timeframe (2010-2015) and duration (approximately 5 years). A preliminary review of federal procurement data suggests that contracts within this category can range significantly in value, from tens of thousands to tens of millions of dollars, depending on the scope and duration. Given the 5-year period, an average annual spend of approximately $4.6 million is substantial but not necessarily out of line for a large federal agency like the FAA. However, a more precise comparison would necessitate identifying contracts with highly similar SOWs and performance metrics.
What are the potential risks associated with a firm-fixed-price contract for broad business support services?
A firm-fixed-price (FFP) contract, while offering cost certainty to the government, carries risks when applied to broad service categories like 'All Other Business Support Services.' One primary risk is scope creep; if the government's needs evolve beyond the initial SOW, the contractor may be hesitant to perform additional work without a contract modification, potentially leading to delays or disputes. Conversely, if the SOW is too vague, the contractor might under-deliver on services they deem outside the scope, leading to performance issues. The FFP structure can also disincentivize innovation or efficiency improvements by the contractor, as they are locked into a price regardless of how efficiently they perform. For the government, the risk lies in potentially paying a premium if the contractor's costs are lower than anticipated, or facing performance shortfalls if the price is too low to incentivize quality.
What was the track record of SERCO MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC. prior to this award?
Serco Management Services, Inc. is a subsidiary of the larger Serco Group plc, a global provider of public services. Prior to this 2010 award, Serco had established a significant presence in the US federal contracting space, often winning large contracts across various civilian and defense agencies. Their track record typically involved managing complex operations, providing IT services, and delivering support functions. The company has historically been involved in contracts related to transportation, defense, and citizen services. The award of this FAA contract suggests that Serco met the agency's requirements for experience, financial stability, and technical capability at that time. However, like many large contractors, Serco has also faced scrutiny and contract disputes on various programs throughout its history.
How did the competition level (3 bidders) impact the potential value for taxpayers?
Having three bidders for this contract represents a moderate level of competition. While it's better than a sole-source award, it may not be as competitive as solicitations attracting five or more bids. With three bidders, there's a reasonable chance that the pricing submitted reflected competitive pressures, potentially leading to a fair market price. However, it also increases the possibility that the winning bid was not the absolute lowest price achievable in a more crowded field. Taxpayers benefit from competition by generally receiving lower prices and higher quality services. The specific impact here depends on the nature of the services and the market dynamics for those specific business support functions. A more robust competition could have potentially driven the price down further.
What is the significance of the contract being awarded by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA)?
The awarding agency, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), is a critical component of the U.S. Department of Transportation responsible for ensuring the safety of civil aviation. This contract, valued at over $23 million, indicates that the FAA required substantial business support services to fulfill its mission. These services could range from administrative functions supporting air traffic control operations, regulatory compliance, or personnel management, to logistical support for the agency's vast infrastructure. The FAA's specific needs and operational environment would dictate the precise nature and importance of the business support services procured from Serco Management Services, Inc.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Business Support Services › All Other Business Support Services
Product/Service Code: UTILITIES AND HOUSEKEEPING › HOUSEKEEPING SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Offers Received: 3
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 1818 LIBRARY ST STE 1000, RESTON, VA, 20190
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Foreign Owned, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $23,238,169
Exercised Options: $23,238,169
Current Obligation: $23,238,169
Contract Characteristics
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Timeline
Start Date: 2010-02-01
Current End Date: 2015-06-30
Potential End Date: 2015-06-30 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2015-06-04
More Contracts from Serco Management Services, Inc.
- Serco Area 5 — $158.7M (Department of Transportation)
- Serco Area 6 — $15.1M (Department of Transportation)
- Postal IAW PWS 4.7 — $12.3M (Department of Defense)
View all Serco Management Services, Inc. federal contracts →
Other Department of Transportation Contracts
- Dafis UDO Reconstruct W/O Advance — $3.8B (Lockheed Martin Services, LLC)
- THE Purpose of This Delivery Order Award IS to ADD Funding for FTI Telecommunications Services — $1.9B (Harris Corporation)
- Provide Funding for Clin 302 for Pre-Flight and In-Flight Services. Contract Number Dtfawa-05-C-00031, Lockheed Martin. POP 01/16/08-03/31/08 — $1.9B (Leidos, Inc.)
- Center for Advanced Aviation Development (caasd) Ffrdc Mitre — $1.7B (THE Mitre Corporation)
- Dafis UDO Reconstruct W/O Advance — $1.5B (Harris Corporation)