Navtech contract for environmental review support awarded to Advanced Management Technology, Inc. for over $45M

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $45,348,221 ($45.3M)

Contractor: Advanced Management Technology, Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Transportation

Start Date: 2010-09-16

End Date: 2017-09-09

Contract Duration: 2,550 days

Daily Burn Rate: $17.8K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: NAVTECH CONTRACT NO. DTFAWA-10-C-00007 55TASK ORDER TO-018 PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE: SEPTEMBER 1, 2010-AUGUST 31, 2013 SUPPORT THE RNAV/RNP GROUP BY ASSISTING THE GROUP IN EFFICIENTLY MANAGING THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW PROCESSES AND IN DOCUMENTING, AS APPROPRIATE, THE ANALYSES OF ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES ASSOCIATED WITH THE PROCEDURES OR AIRSPACE REDESIGN. TAS::69 1301::TAS

Place of Performance

Location: ARLINGTON, ARLINGTON County, VIRGINIA, 22209

State: Virginia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Transportation obligated $45.3 million to ADVANCED MANAGEMENT TECHNOLOGY, INC. for work described as: NAVTECH CONTRACT NO. DTFAWA-10-C-00007 55TASK ORDER TO-018 PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE: SEPTEMBER 1, 2010-AUGUST 31, 2013 SUPPORT THE RNAV/RNP GROUP BY ASSISTING THE GROUP IN EFFICIENTLY MANAGING THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW PROCESSES AND IN DOCUMENTING, AS APPROPRIATE, THE ANALYS… Key points: 1. Contract focuses on environmental review processes for RNAV/RNP group, aiming for efficient management and documentation. 2. Performance period spans over 2.5 years, indicating a need for sustained support. 3. The contract type is Firm Fixed Price, which shifts cost risk to the contractor. 4. Awarded via full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 5. The contract is a delivery order under a larger contract, typical for phased or modular support. 6. The specific task order was issued in September 2010 and completed in September 2017, with a performance period of 2550 days.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The total value of this delivery order is over $45 million. Without specific benchmarks for environmental review support services in the aviation sector, it is difficult to definitively assess value for money. However, the duration of the contract (over 2500 days) suggests a significant scope of work. The firm fixed-price nature of the contract provides cost certainty for the government, but the final price should be evaluated against the delivered outcomes and the contractor's performance.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit a bid. This generally leads to a more competitive environment, potentially resulting in better pricing and quality. The number of bidders is not specified, but the method of award suggests a robust competition.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition is generally favorable for taxpayers as it promotes a level playing field and encourages contractors to offer their best prices and services to win the contract.

Public Impact

The RNAV/RNP group within the FAA benefits from this contract by receiving assistance in managing complex environmental review processes. The services delivered include documentation and analysis of environmental issues related to airspace redesign and procedure implementation. The geographic impact is likely national, as FAA airspace and procedure changes affect aviation operations across the United States. The contract supports specialized engineering and environmental consulting services, potentially impacting a niche workforce.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for scope creep if environmental review requirements are not clearly defined.
Reliance on contractor expertise for critical environmental assessments.
Ensuring timely completion of reviews to avoid delays in airspace redesign projects.

Positive Signals

Firm fixed-price contract provides cost predictability.
Full and open competition suggests potential for competitive pricing.
Contract supports a critical function for the FAA's operational efficiency and environmental compliance.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Engineering Services sector, specifically supporting environmental consulting for aviation infrastructure. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) regularly procures services related to airspace management, environmental impact assessments, and regulatory compliance. Spending in this area is driven by the need to modernize air traffic systems (like RNAV/RNP) while adhering to environmental regulations. Comparable spending benchmarks would typically be found within other government contracts for environmental consulting and engineering support for large-scale infrastructure projects.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). Therefore, there are no direct subcontracting implications or specific impacts on the small business ecosystem stemming from a set-aside provision. The prime contractor, Advanced Management Technology, Inc., is likely a mid-to-large sized firm capable of handling this scope of work.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would primarily reside with the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) contracting officers and program managers. Accountability measures are typically embedded in the contract terms, including performance standards, delivery schedules, and reporting requirements. Transparency is facilitated through contract award databases and public reporting mechanisms. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of suspected fraud, waste, or abuse.

Related Government Programs

FAA Airspace Modernization Programs
Environmental Impact Assessment Services
Aviation Infrastructure Projects
Federal Aviation Administration Contracts

Risk Flags

Potential for delays in critical FAA projects due to environmental review complexities.
Ensuring the quality and accuracy of environmental impact analyses.
Contract performance risk given the long duration and specialized nature of the work.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Transportation awarded $45.3 million to ADVANCED MANAGEMENT TECHNOLOGY, INC.. NAVTECH CONTRACT NO. DTFAWA-10-C-00007 55TASK ORDER TO-018 PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE: SEPTEMBER 1, 2010-AUGUST 31, 2013 SUPPORT THE RNAV/RNP GROUP BY ASSISTING THE GROUP IN EFFICIENTLY MANAGING THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW PROCESSES AND IN DOCUMENTING, AS APPROPRIATE, THE ANALYSES OF ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES ASSOCIATED WITH THE PROCEDURES OR AIRSPACE REDESIGN. TAS::69 1301::TAS

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is ADVANCED MANAGEMENT TECHNOLOGY, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Transportation (Federal Aviation Administration).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $45.3 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2010-09-16. End: 2017-09-09.

What is the track record of Advanced Management Technology, Inc. in performing similar environmental review contracts for the FAA or other federal agencies?

Assessing the track record of Advanced Management Technology, Inc. (AMT) requires a review of their past performance on similar contracts. While this specific contract (DTFAWA-10-C-00007, Task Order TO-018) indicates they were awarded over $45 million for environmental review support, further investigation into their contract history, past performance evaluations (if publicly available), and any reported issues or successes on prior FAA or Department of Transportation projects would be necessary. A positive track record would involve consistent on-time delivery, adherence to budget, high-quality deliverables, and positive feedback from government stakeholders. Conversely, a history of performance issues, contract disputes, or significant cost overruns would raise concerns about their capability to execute future similar contracts effectively.

How does the per-unit cost or overall value of this contract compare to similar environmental review support contracts awarded by the FAA or other agencies during the same period?

Benchmarking the value of this $45+ million contract requires comparing it against similar environmental review support services procured by the FAA or other federal agencies between 2010 and 2017. Key comparison points would include the scope of work (e.g., types of environmental reviews, complexity of airspace redesigns supported), the duration of performance, and the specific deliverables required. Without access to a comprehensive database of comparable contracts and their pricing structures, a precise benchmark is challenging. However, factors such as the number of bidders in the original competition, the contractor's proposed pricing, and any subsequent modifications or change orders could provide insights. A higher-than-average cost for similar services, especially if accompanied by fewer bidders or performance issues, might indicate a fair-to-questionable value.

What are the primary risks associated with this contract, and how were they mitigated by the FAA?

Primary risks associated with this contract likely include the complexity and evolving nature of environmental regulations, potential delays in the environmental review process impacting airspace redesign timelines, and the contractor's ability to deliver high-quality, defensible analyses. Risks could also stem from scope creep if the requirements are not tightly managed. Mitigation strategies employed by the FAA would typically involve clearly defined contract statements of work, robust oversight mechanisms, regular progress reviews, and performance metrics. The firm fixed-price contract structure itself mitigates financial risk for the government by capping costs. Furthermore, the requirement for full and open competition aims to select a contractor with a proven ability to manage such complex projects effectively.

How effective has the support provided under this contract been in facilitating the FAA's environmental review processes and airspace redesign initiatives?

Assessing the effectiveness of the support provided requires evaluating the outcomes achieved by the RNAV/RNP group and the FAA's broader airspace redesign goals during the contract period (September 2010 - August 2017). Key indicators of effectiveness would include the timeliness and efficiency of environmental reviews, the successful implementation of new procedures or airspace designs without significant environmental challenges or delays, and the quality of the documentation produced. Direct measures of effectiveness might include metrics on reduced environmental impact from aviation operations, faster approval times for airspace changes, or positive feedback from regulatory bodies. Without specific performance reports or outcome data from the FAA, a definitive assessment of effectiveness is difficult.

What has been the historical spending trend for environmental review support services by the FAA in the years preceding and following this contract?

To understand the historical spending trend for environmental review support services by the FAA, one would need to analyze FAA's procurement data over several years. This would involve identifying contracts with similar North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) codes (like 541330 - Engineering Services) and keywords related to environmental reviews, airspace management, and aviation. Examining spending patterns before and after the 2010-2017 period of this Navtech contract would reveal whether this $45+ million award was an anomaly, part of a consistent investment, or indicative of an increasing/decreasing trend in such procurements. Understanding these trends provides context for the scale and importance of environmental review services to the FAA's operations.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services › Engineering Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Tetra Tech, Inc. (UEI: 045224250)

Address: 1515 WILSON BLVD STE 1100, ARLINGTON, VA, 22209

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $298,475,563

Exercised Options: $45,898,221

Current Obligation: $45,348,221

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: DTFAWA10C00007

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline