Commerce Department awards $8.29M renovation contract to Vigil Contracting, Inc. under full and open competition

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $8,288 ($8.3K)

Contractor: Vigil Contracting, Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Commerce

Start Date: 2012-04-02

End Date: 2012-04-11

Contract Duration: 9 days

Daily Burn Rate: $921/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Construction

Official Description: BUILDING RENOVATIONS AND ALTERATIONS.

Place of Performance

Location: WASHINGTON, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA County, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 20230

State: District of Columbia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Commerce obligated $8,288 to VIGIL CONTRACTING, INC. for work described as: BUILDING RENOVATIONS AND ALTERATIONS. Key points: 1. The contract value of $8.29 million for building renovations falls within typical ranges for commercial construction projects of this scope. 2. Vigil Contracting, Inc. secured the award through full and open competition, indicating a competitive bidding process. 3. The project's relatively short duration (9 days) suggests a focused scope, potentially for minor alterations rather than extensive renovations. 4. The absence of small business participation is noted, which could be a point of consideration for future contract set-asides.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The award amount of $8.29 million for a 9-day project seems high for minor renovations. Benchmarking against similar commercial and institutional building construction contracts would be necessary to determine if the pricing is competitive.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources,' which is an unusual designation. While it implies competition, the exclusion of specific sources warrants further investigation to understand its impact on price discovery and overall fairness.

Taxpayer Impact: The competitive nature of the award is positive for taxpayers, suggesting that multiple bids were considered. However, the 'exclusion of sources' clause requires scrutiny to ensure no potential cost savings were foregone.

Public Impact

Taxpayers benefit from a competitive bidding process, which generally leads to better pricing. The specific nature of the renovations and their impact on federal facilities are not detailed, limiting public understanding of the project's necessity. The contract's short duration may indicate a focus on essential repairs or upgrades rather than large-scale improvements.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Unusual competition clause ('Exclusion of Sources')
Lack of small business participation
Potentially high cost for short duration

Positive Signals

Awarded under Full and Open Competition
Fixed Price contract type

Sector Analysis

This contract falls under the Commercial and Institutional Building Construction sector. Spending in this sector can vary widely based on project size, complexity, and location. The $8.29 million award for a short-duration project in Washington D.C. warrants comparison with similar local construction contracts.

Small Business Impact

The contract data indicates that small businesses were not involved in this specific award, as the 'sb' field is false. Future opportunities may exist for small businesses in similar construction projects, depending on set-aside strategies.

Oversight & Accountability

The 'Exclusion of Sources' clause within the full and open competition framework raises questions about the thoroughness of the oversight process. Further review is needed to ensure all appropriate vendors were considered and that the exclusion was justified.

Related Government Programs

Commercial and Institutional Building Construction
Department of Commerce Contracting
Office of the Secretary Programs

Risk Flags

Unusual competition clause ('Exclusion of Sources')
High cost relative to project duration
Lack of small business participation
Limited detail on scope of work

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Commerce awarded $8,288 to VIGIL CONTRACTING, INC.. BUILDING RENOVATIONS AND ALTERATIONS.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is VIGIL CONTRACTING, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Commerce (Office of the Secretary).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $8,288.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2012-04-02. End: 2012-04-11.

What specific renovations or alterations were performed under this contract, and how do they align with the Department of Commerce's operational needs?

The provided data lacks specifics on the exact nature of the building renovations and alterations. Understanding the scope of work is crucial to assess the necessity and value of the $8.29 million expenditure. Without this detail, it's difficult to determine if the investment directly supports the Department of Commerce's mission or addresses critical infrastructure needs.

What was the justification for excluding certain sources from the full and open competition, and did this exclusion impact the final contract price?

The data indicates 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources,' a designation that requires further explanation. The justification for excluding potential bidders needs to be documented and reviewed to ensure fairness and prevent potential collusion or favoritism. It is possible that excluding sources limited the competitive landscape, potentially leading to a higher price than if all qualified vendors had participated.

How does the $8.29 million cost for a 9-day renovation project compare to industry benchmarks for similar commercial and institutional building construction in the Washington D.C. area?

The cost of $8.29 million for a project completed in just 9 days appears exceptionally high for typical building renovations. Benchmarking against similar contracts for commercial and institutional building construction in the District of Columbia is essential. Without this comparison, it is difficult to ascertain if this represents a fair market price or if taxpayer funds were potentially overutilized for the scope of work delivered.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Construction › Nonresidential Building Construction › Commercial and Institutional Building Construction

Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, ALTER REAL PROPERTY › MAINT, ALTER, REPAIR NONBUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 2140 PRIEST BRIDGE CT STE 7, CROFTON, MD, 21114

Business Categories: 8(a) Program Participant, Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, DoT Certified Disadvantaged Business Enterprise, Emerging Small Business, Hispanic American Owned Business, Minority Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Small Disadvantaged Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business, Woman Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $8,288

Exercised Options: $8,288

Current Obligation: $8,288

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: DOCSA130111CQ0001

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline