Commerce Department Awards $8.3M for Building Renovations to Vigil Contracting, Inc

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $8,307 ($8.3K)

Contractor: Vigil Contracting, Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Commerce

Start Date: 2012-03-22

End Date: 2012-03-30

Contract Duration: 8 days

Daily Burn Rate: $1.0K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Construction

Official Description: BUILDING RENOVATIONS AND ALTERATIONS.

Place of Performance

Location: WASHINGTON, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA County, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 20230

State: District of Columbia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Commerce obligated $8,307 to VIGIL CONTRACTING, INC. for work described as: BUILDING RENOVATIONS AND ALTERATIONS. Key points: 1. The contract value of $8.3 million for building renovations is a significant investment. 2. Vigil Contracting, Inc. secured this award, indicating potential market concentration or specialized capabilities. 3. The procurement method, 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources,' warrants scrutiny regarding its impact on price discovery. 4. The sector is Commercial and Institutional Building Construction, a vital area for infrastructure.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The award amount of $8.3 million for building renovations needs to be benchmarked against similar projects to assess value. Without specific details on the scope of work, a direct pricing comparison is difficult, but the amount suggests a substantial project.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: limited

The procurement method 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources' suggests that while competition was sought, certain sources were initially excluded. This could limit the pool of bidders and potentially impact price competitiveness compared to unrestricted full and open competition.

Taxpayer Impact: The impact on taxpayers depends on whether the limited competition resulted in a fair and reasonable price. If the exclusion of sources was justified and effective competition was still achieved, the taxpayer impact could be neutral to positive.

Public Impact

Taxpayers are funding significant building renovations, impacting federal infrastructure. The choice of contractor, Vigil Contracting, Inc., and the procurement method could influence local economic participation. The duration of the contract (8 days) for renovations of this scale raises questions about the project's scope and execution timeline.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

  • Limited competition method may have inflated costs.
  • Short contract duration for renovations is unusual.
  • Lack of small business participation noted.

Positive Signals

  • Awarded to a specific contractor, potentially indicating expertise.
  • Project addresses necessary building renovations.

Sector Analysis

The Commercial and Institutional Building Construction sector is critical for maintaining federal facilities. Spending benchmarks for renovations vary widely based on project scope, location, and building type. This $8.3 million award falls within a moderate to high range for significant renovation projects.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that small businesses were not directly involved in this contract (sb: false). This suggests that the prime contractor, Vigil Contracting, Inc., did not subcontract to small businesses for this specific award, potentially missing opportunities for small business development.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight would focus on ensuring the renovations meet specifications, are completed on time, and within budget, especially given the limited competition and short duration. Accountability rests with the Department of Commerce to justify the procurement method and contractor selection.

Related Government Programs

  • Commercial and Institutional Building Construction
  • Department of Commerce Contracting
  • Office of the Secretary Programs

Risk Flags

  • Limited competition may have led to higher costs.
  • Unusually short contract duration raises concerns about scope or feasibility.
  • Lack of small business participation.
  • Procurement method requires justification for source exclusion.

Tags

commercial-and-institutional-building-co, department-of-commerce, dc, delivery-order, under-100k

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Commerce awarded $8,307 to VIGIL CONTRACTING, INC.. BUILDING RENOVATIONS AND ALTERATIONS.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is VIGIL CONTRACTING, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Commerce (Office of the Secretary).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $8,307.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2012-03-22. End: 2012-03-30.

What was the specific scope of work for these building renovations, and how did it justify the $8.3 million award?

The specific scope of work is not detailed in the provided data. However, an $8.3 million award suggests substantial renovations, potentially including structural upgrades, system modernizations (HVAC, electrical, plumbing), interior redesigns, or facade improvements. The justification would lie in the necessity of these upgrades for facility functionality, safety, and compliance with modern standards.

How did the 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources' method impact the final price and ensure fair market value?

This procurement method implies that initial sources were excluded before the competition opened. While competition occurred, the exclusion could have limited the number of qualified bidders, potentially reducing downward pressure on price. A thorough review would be needed to confirm if the final price was indeed fair and reasonable compared to what might have been achieved under unrestricted competition.

What is the rationale behind the extremely short 8-day contract duration for building renovations of this magnitude?

An 8-day duration for an $8.3 million renovation project is highly unusual and likely indicates a misunderstanding or misrepresentation of the contract's scope or timeline. It could refer to a specific phase, a very limited scope of work like emergency repairs, or a data entry error. Further clarification is essential to understand the actual project timeline and feasibility.

Industry Classification

NAICS: ConstructionNonresidential Building ConstructionCommercial and Institutional Building Construction

Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, ALTER REAL PROPERTYMAINT, ALTER, REPAIR NONBUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 2140 PRIEST BRIDGE CT STE 7, CROFTON, MD, 21114

Business Categories: 8(a) Program Participant, Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, DoT Certified Disadvantaged Business Enterprise, Emerging Small Business, Hispanic American Owned Business, Minority Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Small Disadvantaged Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business, Woman Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $8,307

Exercised Options: $8,307

Current Obligation: $8,307

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: DOCSA130111CQ0001

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2012-03-22

Current End Date: 2012-03-30

Potential End Date: 2012-03-30 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2026-04-10

More Contracts from Vigil Contracting, Inc.

View all Vigil Contracting, Inc. federal contracts →

Other Department of Commerce Contracts

View all Department of Commerce contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending