Commerce Department Awards $321K Renovation Contract to Vigil Contracting, Inc. via Full and Open Competition

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $2,568 ($2.6K)

Contractor: Vigil Contracting, Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Commerce

Start Date: 2012-03-22

End Date: 2012-03-30

Contract Duration: 8 days

Daily Burn Rate: $321/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Construction

Official Description: BUILDING RENOVATIONS AND ALTERATIONS.

Place of Performance

Location: WASHINGTON, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA County, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 20230

State: District of Columbia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Commerce obligated $2,568 to VIGIL CONTRACTING, INC. for work described as: BUILDING RENOVATIONS AND ALTERATIONS. Key points: 1. Contract value of $321,000 for building renovations. 2. Vigil Contracting, Inc. secured the award. 3. Competition method was 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources'. 4. The sector is Commercial and Institutional Building Construction.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $321,000 for an 8-day delivery order appears reasonable for building renovations. Benchmarking against similar projects would provide a clearer assessment of value.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources', indicating an attempt to broaden the competitive pool. The specific exclusion of sources needs further review to ensure it didn't unduly limit competition.

Taxpayer Impact: The relatively small contract value suggests a minimal direct taxpayer impact, but ensuring fair competition is crucial for overall fiscal responsibility.

Public Impact

Local businesses in the District of Columbia may have been impacted by the contract award. The renovation project likely improved federal facilities, potentially enhancing operational efficiency. Transparency in the 'exclusion of sources' process is important for public trust.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

  • Potential for limited competition due to 'exclusion of sources'.
  • Short duration of the project may indicate a narrow scope or urgent need.

Positive Signals

  • Awarded under full and open competition.
  • Clear contract type (Firm Fixed Price) for cost certainty.

Sector Analysis

The Commercial and Institutional Building Construction sector is vital for maintaining federal infrastructure. Spending benchmarks vary widely based on project scope and location, but this contract appears to be a smaller-scale renovation.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that small business participation was not a stated factor in this award (sb: false). Further analysis would be needed to determine if small businesses had an opportunity to compete or if this was a subcontracting effort.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight would focus on the justification for excluding specific sources and ensuring the renovation met all quality and safety standards within the awarded price.

Related Government Programs

  • Commercial and Institutional Building Construction
  • Department of Commerce Contracting
  • Office of the Secretary Programs

Risk Flags

  • Potential for limited competition.
  • Lack of detailed scope of work for short duration.
  • Need for justification for source exclusion.
  • Absence of small business participation noted.

Tags

commercial-and-institutional-building-co, department-of-commerce, dc, delivery-order, under-100k

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Commerce awarded $2,568 to VIGIL CONTRACTING, INC.. BUILDING RENOVATIONS AND ALTERATIONS.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is VIGIL CONTRACTING, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Commerce (Office of the Secretary).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $2,568.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2012-03-22. End: 2012-03-30.

What was the specific justification for excluding certain sources in the 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources' process, and did this exclusion limit the potential for a lower price?

The justification for excluding sources needs to be documented and reviewed. If the exclusion was not based on legitimate technical or capability requirements, it could have artificially limited competition, potentially leading to a higher price than could have been achieved through unrestricted full and open competition. This aspect requires further investigation into the procurement file.

How does the $321,000 contract value compare to similar building renovation projects of comparable scope and complexity within the District of Columbia?

Benchmarking this $321,000 contract against similar renovation projects is essential for a comprehensive value assessment. Factors like square footage, type of work (e.g., structural, cosmetic, MEP), and prevailing labor/material costs in D.C. would be considered. Without this comparative data, it's difficult to definitively state if the price was optimal.

Given the short 8-day duration, what was the precise scope of work, and were there any risks associated with the rapid completion timeline that could impact quality or cost?

The rapid 8-day completion suggests a very specific and potentially limited scope of work, possibly involving minor repairs or alterations. Risks associated with such a tight deadline could include rushed execution, potential shortcuts impacting quality, or unforeseen issues arising that cannot be adequately addressed within the timeframe. Clarity on the scope is needed to assess these risks.

Industry Classification

NAICS: ConstructionNonresidential Building ConstructionCommercial and Institutional Building Construction

Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, ALTER REAL PROPERTYMAINT, ALTER, REPAIR NONBUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 2140 PRIEST BRIDGE CT STE 7, CROFTON, MD, 21114

Business Categories: 8(a) Program Participant, Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, DoT Certified Disadvantaged Business Enterprise, Emerging Small Business, Hispanic American Owned Business, Minority Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Small Disadvantaged Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business, Woman Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $2,568

Exercised Options: $2,568

Current Obligation: $2,568

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: DOCSA130111CQ0001

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2012-03-22

Current End Date: 2012-03-30

Potential End Date: 2012-03-30 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2026-04-10

More Contracts from Vigil Contracting, Inc.

View all Vigil Contracting, Inc. federal contracts →

Other Department of Commerce Contracts

View all Department of Commerce contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending