DOJ Litigation Support Contract Exceeds $28M, Awarded to PAE Labat-Anderson LLC

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $28,008,264 ($28.0M)

Contractor: PAE Labat-Anderson LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Justice

Start Date: 2013-12-19

End Date: 2021-05-31

Contract Duration: 2,720 days

Daily Burn Rate: $10.3K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 4

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS

Sector: Other

Official Description: IGF::CT::IGF THIS CONTRACT WILL BE USED TO PROVIDE PROFESSIONAL LITIGATION SUPPORT PRODUCTS AND SERVICES TO THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE AND OTHER FEDERAL AGENCIES ON AN INDEFINITE DELIVERY, INDEFINITE QUANTITY TASK ORDER BASIS. INDIVIDUAL TASK ORDERS ISSUED UNDER THIS CONTRACT MAY SUPPORT ANY DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE ORGANIZATION OR FEDERAL AGENCY ON A LOCAL AND/OR NATIONWIDE BASIS. SERVICES MAY BE REQUIRED ANYWHERE IN OR OUTSIDE OF THE UNITED STATES AND ITS TERRITORIES. THIS CONTRACT WILL ALSO BE USED TO SUPPORT CASE- OR INVESTIGATION-RELATED ADMINISTRATIVE FUNCTIONS

Place of Performance

Location: MCLEAN, FAIRFAX County, VIRGINIA, 22101

State: Virginia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Justice obligated $28.0 million to PAE LABAT-ANDERSON LLC for work described as: IGF::CT::IGF THIS CONTRACT WILL BE USED TO PROVIDE PROFESSIONAL LITIGATION SUPPORT PRODUCTS AND SERVICES TO THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE AND OTHER FEDERAL AGENCIES ON AN INDEFINITE DELIVERY, INDEFINITE QUANTITY TASK ORDER BASIS. INDIVIDUAL TASK ORDERS ISSUED UNDER THIS CONTRACT MAY … Key points: 1. Contract provides broad litigation support to DOJ and other federal agencies. 2. Services can be required domestically and internationally. 3. Significant contract duration of over 7 years. 4. Full and open competition was utilized. 5. Task orders are issued on an IDIQ basis.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract's total value of $28M over its lifespan suggests a reasonable average annual spend. Without specific task order details or comparable contract data, a precise pricing assessment is difficult, but the value appears aligned with the broad scope of litigation support services.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating a robust price discovery process. This method generally leads to competitive pricing as multiple vendors had the opportunity to bid.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition likely resulted in a fair price for taxpayers by leveraging market forces to obtain litigation support services.

Public Impact

Ensures critical legal and administrative functions for the Department of Justice and other federal agencies. Supports a wide range of legal cases and investigations, potentially impacting national security and public safety. Provides flexibility for agencies to procure necessary litigation support services as needed. International service capability ensures support for global legal matters.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 75 / 10

Warning Flags

Long contract duration could lead to potential cost increases over time.
Broad scope of services may lead to scope creep if not managed carefully.

Positive Signals

Full and open competition ensures competitive pricing.
IDIQ structure provides flexibility for agency needs.
Support for multiple federal agencies offers economies of scale.

Sector Analysis

The legal services sector, particularly litigation support, is crucial for government operations. Spending in this area can fluctuate based on caseloads and legislative priorities. This contract's value is moderate within the context of large federal legal support procurements.

Small Business Impact

The provided data does not indicate whether small businesses were involved as subcontractors. Further analysis would be needed to determine the extent of small business participation.

Oversight & Accountability

The IDIQ nature of the contract requires diligent oversight of individual task orders to ensure adherence to scope, cost, and performance standards. Agency task order managers play a key role in accountability.

Related Government Programs

All Other Legal Services
Department of Justice Contracting
Offices, Boards and Divisions Programs

Risk Flags

Long contract duration.
Broad service scope.
Potential for international service delivery complexities.
Time and Materials pricing structure can increase cost uncertainty.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Justice awarded $28.0 million to PAE LABAT-ANDERSON LLC. IGF::CT::IGF THIS CONTRACT WILL BE USED TO PROVIDE PROFESSIONAL LITIGATION SUPPORT PRODUCTS AND SERVICES TO THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE AND OTHER FEDERAL AGENCIES ON AN INDEFINITE DELIVERY, INDEFINITE QUANTITY TASK ORDER BASIS. INDIVIDUAL TASK ORDERS ISSUED UNDER THIS CONTRACT MAY SUPPORT ANY DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE ORGANIZATION OR FEDERAL AGENCY ON A LOCAL AND/OR NATIONWIDE BASIS. SERVICES MAY BE REQUIRED ANYWHERE IN OR OUTSIDE OF THE UNITED STATES AND ITS TERRITORIES. THIS CONTRACT WILL ALSO BE US

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is PAE LABAT-ANDERSON LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Justice (Offices, Boards and Divisions).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $28.0 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2013-12-19. End: 2021-05-31.

What was the average value of task orders issued under this contract, and how did it compare to initial estimates?

The average task order value is not directly provided in the data. Analyzing individual task orders would be necessary to determine their average value and compare it against any initial projections or benchmarks. This would offer insight into how the contract's overall value was realized and whether it aligned with expectations for individual service needs.

What specific types of litigation support services were most frequently procured, and did this align with the contract's intended purpose?

The data indicates 'All Other Legal Services' (NAICS 541199) and 'Professional Litigation Support Products and Services.' To assess alignment, a detailed breakdown of task orders would be required to identify the most common service categories. This would reveal if the contract effectively met the core needs for litigation support or if it was utilized for ancillary services.

Were there any performance issues or disputes reported during the contract's nearly 8-year period of performance?

The provided data does not contain information on performance issues or disputes. A comprehensive review of contract performance reports, CPARS (Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System) data, and any associated legal or administrative filings would be necessary to identify any challenges encountered during the contract's execution.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Legal Services › All Other Legal Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › MANAGEMENT SUPPORT SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Offers Received: 4

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS (Y)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Altegrity, Inc.

Address: 7799 LEESBURG PIKE STE 300N, FALLS CHURCH, VA, 22043

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $28,008,264

Exercised Options: $28,008,264

Current Obligation: $28,008,264

Actual Outlays: $1,801,052

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: DJJ13C2442

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline